Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> var("t")
> y=function('y',t)
> solve(diff(y,t,2)-2*diff(y,t)+diff(y,t)==3, y(t))
>
> to "solve" for y(t).
>
> Doesn't Axiom work this way?
Yes. (well, FriCAS is what I'm developing) Actually, one thing which is really
nice about FriCAS is that it's ve
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
>
>> "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Rubey
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear William,
thanks for your quick answer, even though it doesn't make me
On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Rubey
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear William,
>>>
>>> thanks for your quick answer, even though it doesn't make me too
>>> happy. I'm
>>> hav
On Oct 27, 11:00 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sage: axiom.solve(sqrt(sqrt(4*x^2 + 1) - x^2 - 1), x)
>
> >+-+ +-+
> > [x= 0,x= \|2 ,x= - \|2 ]
>
> Sage's solve command is simply a light wrapper around Maxima's,
> and Maxima doesn't solve the above:
FTR the
2008/10/28 Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just to add another view, I can never remember all the different
> function names, so I find it very convenient to have namespace
> pollution as Martin Rubey calls it. If I look for a certain plot
> function, I would like to be able to type plot
Just to add another view, I can never remember all the different
function names, so I find it very convenient to have namespace
pollution as Martin Rubey calls it. If I look for a certain plot
function, I would like to be able to type plot and then hit the tab
button to see all the possible variat
"David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear William,
> >
> > thanks for your quick answer, even though it doesn't make me too happy. I'm
> > having a hard time here, I must admit. So far I thought that sage w
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear William,
>
> thanks for your quick answer, even though it doesn't make me too happy. I'm
> having a hard time here, I must admit. So far I thought that sage would do
> most things out of the box, and it's only inco
Dear William,
thanks for your quick answer, even though it doesn't make me too happy. I'm
having a hard time here, I must admit. So far I thought that sage would do
most things out of the box, and it's only inconsistent (eg., arguments to plot,
plot3d and integrate vary wildly. There are sever
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How come that solve doesn't solve this?
>
> sage: solve(sqrt(sqrt(4*x^2 + 1) - x^2 - 1), x)
> [x == -sqrt(sqrt(4*x^2 + 1) - 1), x == sqrt(sqrt(4*x^2 + 1) - 1)]
>
> sage: axiom.solve(sqrt(sqrt(4*x^2 + 1) - x^2 - 1), x)
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
