Thanks for the help. I hadn't looked at the error log, thinking it was a known
problem.
John
From: Dima Pasechnik
To: sage-support
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 3:40 AM
Subject: [sage-support] Re: Sage crashes on start
from your report:ImportError: libgfortran.so.3: cannot
from your report:
ImportError: libgfortran.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
This is a missing dependency, libgfortran, that needs to be installed.
On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 11:12:34 AM UTC+1, Naturelover wrote:
>
>
>
> I just installed SageMath 7.6 on my Fed
Similar issue in fedora 26; sage -i -f openblas solved it
El martes, 11 de julio de 2017, 14:58:54 (UTC+2), Kathlén Kohn escribió:
>
> I just installed sagemath 7.6-8 using pacman and it crashes right away.
> The crash report is attached.
>
> It says "libgfortran.so.3: cannot open shared object f
I have been attempting to build sage on arch recently (but not quite
succeeding so far). For what it's worth, I recently installed sagemath-git
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sagemath-git/) and had no problem,
though. The sagemath-git AUR had a fully functioning sage within it
(although it
your log says
platform': 'Linux-3.11.10-100.fc18.x86_64-x86_64-with-fedora-18-Spherical_Cow'
this is a 4-year old Linux, why do you think it is fedora 24?
Fedora 18 reached its EOL in 2014...
it's a miracle it still works :-)
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 7:37:05 PM UTC,
afa...@intran
so instead i used the precompiled sage and i got this error attached.
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 2:31:53 PM UTC-5,
afa...@intranet.techsquare.com wrote:
>
> so i have sage compiled on an ubuntu server and clients are fedora24.
> in the Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU sage crashes, i attached one
Hi
Yes, I know about the icon error, it will be fixed in the next version.
Actually I will copy the icon in to the package so I don't get bitten by
the path filename changes.
Unless that can be done upstream.
Regards,
Jan
On 4 February 2016 at 22:09, Jacopo wrote:
> Ok, apparently I should h
Ok, apparently I should have just been googling a bit more before posting
here; anyway, should someone have the same issue, here's how I solved it.
As Dima pointed out, the package
sagemath-upstream-binary
in the PPA is currently broken; for some weird reason however installing
sagemath-upstream
the PPA is apparently broken.
There are other posts around to indicate this.
You might try to build Sage from source instead, or download a full binary
build; this all should work.
On Thursday, 4 February 2016 16:20:27 UTC, Jacopo wrote:
>
> Yesterday I updated to the latest version of Sage. Appa
Can you run the command manually in gap? what happens?
$ sage -gap
┌───┐ GAP, Version 4.7.8 of 09-Jun-2015 (free software, GPL)
│ GAP │ http://www.gap-system.org
└───┘ Architecture: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-default64
Libs used: gmp, readline
Loading the library and packa
Hi Michael,
On 2013-01-14, Michael Beeson wrote:
> --=_Part_111_11990633.1358202706289
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> sage: K. = FractionField(PolynomialRing(QQ,4,'pdeN'))
> sage: R. = K[]
> sage: a = x^3-x^-3
> sage: b = x^5-x^-5
> sage: c = x^8-x^-8
Are you aware that
On Monday, January 14, 2013 2:31:46 PM UTC-8, Michael Beeson wrote:
>
> sage: K. = FractionField(PolynomialRing(QQ,4,'pdeN'))
>
Why not just
sage: K. = PolynomialRing(QQ,4,'pdeN')
>
With this change, sage doesn't hang (for me). Oh, I see, later you need
field coefficients.
sage: R. = K[]
So one problem with the original post was that the thing I was trying to
cast to a polynomial isn't a polynomial.
I should have multiplied by x^32, not x^16. The correct input works
correctly (see below). Still, attempting
to cast a rational function with too big a denominator to a polynomi
oh, never mind, this isn't the same computation as I didn't square X.
On Monday, January 14, 2013 2:54:08 PM UTC-8, Michael Beeson wrote:
>
> If I break the computation into smaller pieces it works OK:
>
>
> sage: K. = FractionField(PolynomialRing(QQ,4,'pdeN'))
>> sage: R. = K[]
>> sage: a = x^3-
If I break the computation into smaller pieces it works OK:
sage: K. = FractionField(PolynomialRing(QQ,4,'pdeN'))
> sage: R. = K[]
> sage: a = x^3-x^-3
> sage: b = x^5-x^-5
> sage: c = x^8-x^-8
> sage: X = p*a +d*b + e*c
> sage: H = R(x^8 * X)
> sage: f = H - N*b*c*x^16
> sage: f
> -N*x^29 + N*x^
On 20 July 2012 18:57, Keshav Kini wrote:
> David Kirkby writes:
>> The usual reccomenedation when people get problems is to build Sage
>> from source code. That normallly works without problems. You are
>> unlikely to need to install any other packages, as Sage comes with
>> most things included
David Kirkby writes:
> The usual reccomenedation when people get problems is to build Sage
> from source code. That normallly works without problems. You are
> unlikely to need to install any other packages, as Sage comes with
> most things included - even a compiler! (At leat I think the compiler
tvn writes:
> I am trying to run Sage 5.1 from a computer at work running Debian
> and it crashes right when starts up ..
>
>
> wooly Fri Jul 20:13:26:00 (210) ~/Src/Devel/SAGE/
> sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_12.04_lts-x86_64-Linux
You're running an Ubuntu binary on a Debian system. I would n
You are using a 10.6 binary on 10.5. There is a 10.5 binary, called:
sage-4.3.3-OSX-32bit-10.5-i386-Darwin.dmg
which should work. You can also always compile from source, which is
not difficult with Sage (although it would probably take an hour or so
on your mac pro).
-M. Hampton
On Mar 4, 9:
I was able to rebuild sage and get it running. I am not sure what
fixed it.
What I did different:
installed a lisp package
ran the make without the -j processor option and the testing option
made more room on my hard drive because of possibly running out of
space.
--~--~-~--~~-
I was able to rebuild sage and get it running. I am not sure what
fixed it.
What I did different:
installed a lisp package
ran the make without the -j processor option and the testing option
made more room on my hard drive because of possibly running out of
space.
--~--~-~--~~-
Your build failed. Please post somewhere /usr/src/sage-4.1.1/install.log...
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Don wrote:
>
> /usr/src/sage-4.1.1>./sage
> --
> | Sage Version 4.1.1, Release Date: 2009-08-14
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:07 PM, vakaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have compiled from source. Now it works. If I backup this compiled
> on my computer sage version, then reinstall my operating system, then
> restore sage. Should sage work?
Yes, it should. But just to be sure you may wa
I have compiled from source. Now it works. If I backup this compiled
on my computer sage version, then reinstall my operating system, then
restore sage. Should sage work?
On Feb 29, 6:17 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:52 AM, vakaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
24 matches
Mail list logo
