[sage-support] Re: command line install of OS X binary

2007-12-13 Thread Marshall Hampton
Its a pretty heterogeneous package for bioinformatics; there are lots of modules that do lots of different things, written by different people. Because of that, as with sage, there is some redundancy in function that is slowly being weeded out. There are only about 5-10 very active developers at

[sage-support] Re: command line install of OS X binary

2007-12-13 Thread William Stein
On Dec 13, 2007 4:27 PM, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Excellent! Thank you! > The only problem you might run into is if the optional biopython package is somehow "not relocatable", which would be a bug you should report here. By the way, could you describe from a sage point of

[sage-support] Re: command line install of OS X binary

2007-12-13 Thread Marshall Hampton
Excellent! Thank you! On Dec 13, 5:30 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 13, 2007 2:10 PM, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The problem is that I am not the real administrator of the machines, > > this is a one time thing. > > > The binaries appear to wor

[sage-support] Re: command line install of OS X binary

2007-12-13 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 14, 12:30 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 13, 2007 2:10 PM, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The problem is that I am not the real administrator of the machines, > > this is a one time thing. > > > The binaries appear to work, but now I need to

[sage-support] Re: command line install of OS X binary

2007-12-13 Thread William Stein
On Dec 13, 2007 2:10 PM, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem is that I am not the real administrator of the machines, > this is a one time thing. > > The binaries appear to work, but now I need to install the biopython > package, which for some reason needs gcc. So I plan

[sage-support] Re: command line install of OS X binary

2007-12-13 Thread Marshall Hampton
The problem is that I am not the real administrator of the machines, this is a one time thing. The binaries appear to work, but now I need to install the biopython package, which for some reason needs gcc. So I plan on installing the xcode tools on one machine, and then copying the entire instal

[sage-support] Re: command line install of OS X binary

2007-12-13 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 13, 8:04 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 13, 2007 10:48 AM, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I would like to install sage on a bunch (30-60) of computers (intel OS > > X machines) which don't have the developer tools included (like >

[sage-support] Re: command line install of OS X binary

2007-12-13 Thread William Stein
On Dec 13, 2007 10:48 AM, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to install sage on a bunch (30-60) of computers (intel OS > X machines) which don't have the developer tools included (like > make). Is there a way of remotely installing the OS binaries? Has > anyone