> >
> > Interesting. If you have ideas on how to improve it so that you might
> do
> > so, please start a thread on sage-devel about that.
>
> I don't. I have expressed my dislike of AskSage as soon as it was
> available. It is just that I don't like all these badges and awards and
> I do
Sage has two sources of support, the mailing list sage-support and the
AskSage site. Users and helpful developers can use whichever they
choose, and I don't think that any of us should be telling anyone
which one they ought to use, either as an asker of questions or as a
helpful answerer. Of cour
Hi Karl-Dieter,
On 2016-11-09, kcrisman wrote:
>> > This is a very good question for Ask Sage, would you ask it there?
>>
>> Why should he? He did ask here. And I, for one, dislike the Ask Sage
>> pages to the extent that I wouldn't answer questions there.
>>
>
> Interesting. If you have ide
> > This is a very good question for Ask Sage, would you ask it there?
>
> Why should he? He did ask here. And I, for one, dislike the Ask Sage
> pages to the extent that I wouldn't answer questions there.
>
Interesting. If you have ideas on how to improve it so that you might do
so, plea
A bit of numerical analysis (see enclosed Jupyter notebook) proves that
this polynomial has at least two real roots, and quite probably four), one
of them being positive.
This triggers the question : does Sage have built-in facilities for
uncertainty computation ("calcul d'erreurs" in French, b
On 2016-11-08, slelievre wrote:
> This is a very good question for Ask Sage, would you ask it there?
Why should he? He did ask here. And I, for one, dislike the Ask Sage
pages to the extent that I wouldn't answer questions there.
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subsc
Sun 2016-11-06 16:00:30 UTC+1, Francis Banks:
> I am solving a polynomial which arises from plotting titration cures
> in chemistry. The rule of signs suggests it has one positive root.
> Find_root seems to find it. Solve with poly_solve=true does not.
> Instead it gives 4 complex roots, which don
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 3:00:30 PM UTC, Francis Banks wrote:
>
> I am solving a polynomial which arises from plotting titration cures in
> chemistry. The rule of signs suggests it has one positive root. Find_root
> seems to find it. Solve with poly_solve=true does not. Instead it gives 4
