Hello all,
I've posted a patch up on trac:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2519
And I've decided to move the technical discussion to sage-devel:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b6fcc3a134abe22c
Take care,
Franco
--
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:07 P
2008/4/21 Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I'm sorry to reply in so late on this, things have been busy and I've
> not been keeping up with the list lately.
>
> As for my slides: all included examples do work in Sage or "Sage++",
> where Sage++ denotes a future vers
Hello everyone.
I'm sorry to reply in so late on this, things have been busy and I've
not been keeping up with the list lately.
As for my slides: all included examples do work in Sage or "Sage++",
where Sage++ denotes a future version of Sage. The upshot is that
there is some code to add support
If you note carefully, the slides switch from being about "Let's use
Sage" to "Let's use Sage++" between Demos 5 and 6, which would
validate John's suspicion. In a slightly older version than Jason's I
have neither MacDonald nor Jack Polynomials, and of course not Poset,
and apparently not "@man
John Cremona wrote:
> PS Sorry that should have read "posted" and not "poseted" , ha ha.
> The talk is at
> http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~saliola/maths/talks/slides/SageTalk1.pdf
>
Interesting. I tried the example in 2.11 and ran into problems with the
very first line:
sage: P = Poset([[1,2],[
PS Sorry that should have read "posted" and not "poseted" , ha ha.
The talk is at
http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~saliola/maths/talks/slides/SageTalk1.pdf
John
2008/4/20 John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you look at Franco's Sage talk (poseted here recently) he includes
> a screenful of poset e
If you look at Franco's Sage talk (poseted here recently) he includes
a screenful of poset examples (on page 50, near the end of the
presentation) -- which in fact makes it look as if it's in Sage
already. So unless that page of the talk is wishful thinking, he must
have made some real progress t
There is also a group at Bard that wants to see posets implemented.
All these efforts should be coordinated...
On Apr 17, 9:38 am, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 17, 11:03 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 17, 6:03 am, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
On Apr 17, 11:03 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 17, 6:03 am, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However, what I really want is to be able to do this dynamically and
> > to have the output be an "ordered set". Maybe an example would be
> > that I might want to list dif
On Apr 17, 6:03 am, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, what I really want is to be able to do this dynamically and
> to have the output be an "ordered set". Maybe an example would be
> that I might want to list different orders of operations, so that
> object A="exponentiation>multipl
On Apr 17, 8:16 am, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 17, 1:08 pm, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The point is that I'm not sure how to tell elements that they
> > are greater than each other without defining a new class with _cmp_ or
> > something, which would be th
On Apr 17, 1:08 pm, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point is that I'm not sure how to tell elements that they
> are greater than each other without defining a new class with _cmp_ or
> something, which would be the opposite of my goal of being able to
> dynamically assign an ordering to
On Apr 17, 4:29 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 at 09:22PM -0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
> > What do you want to do with posets?
Hmm, well for now I'd be happy with the ability to place an arbitrary
set of strings (or other Sage objects) into a total ordering, I guess
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 at 09:22PM -0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
> What do you want to do with posets?
I'd like posets too. What I want is to have a bunch of objects, and
define a poset with them...I want to provide a "<" function and then
have the poset code list all elements <= a given element, in an
in
On Apr 17, 6:22 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dear Group,
>
> > What support is there for posets and/or totally ordered sets in Sage?
> > It doesn't seem to be in the Reference manual. Nor is it in th
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> What support is there for posets and/or totally ordered sets in Sage?
> It doesn't seem to be in the Reference manual. Nor is it in the
> Python documentation, but it seems like in order to do sorting Pyt
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> What support is there for posets and/or totally ordered sets in Sage?
> It doesn't seem to be in the Reference manual. Nor is it in the
> Python documentation, but it seems like in order to do sorting Pyt
17 matches
Mail list logo
