Replying to myself. Somehow a rerun on this worked (weird). However,
the output is 7.099e-27, not 7.099 \times 10$^{-27}$.
On Mar 3, 11:03 am, sm123123 wrote:
> :)
>
> I tried the \percent macro.
>
> I got:
>
> File "problemset.py", line 39
> _st_.inline(_sage_const_1 , latex(''%_sage_const
:)
I tried the \percent macro.
I got:
File "problemset.py", line 39
_st_.inline(_sage_const_1 , latex(''%_sage_const_12p 3e"%lnm1))
^
SyntaxError: invalid token
where lnm1 is a variable defined in a \begin{sagesilent} ...
\end{sage
I got:
File "problemset.py", line 39
_st_.inline(_sage_const_1 , latex(''%_sage_const_12p 3e"%lnm1))
^
SyntaxError: invalid token
where lnm1 is a variable defined in a \begin{sagesilent} ...
\end{sagesilent} environment.
On Mar 3,
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 at 07:34PM -0800, sm123123 wrote:
> I tried using the format specs in SageTeX:
>
> \newcommand{\sagenum}[1]{\sage{''temp1=#1;%12.3e"%temp1}}
>
> This fails to compile as "%" is the comment character in LaTeX.
>
> If I escape it with a backslash (as is customary in LaTeX), Sag
Thanks for your detailed and helpful response.
I tried using the format specs in SageTeX:
\newcommand{\sagenum}[1]{\sage{''temp1=#1;%12.3e"%temp1}}
This fails to compile as "%" is the comment character in LaTeX.
If I escape it with a backslash (as is customary in LaTeX), Sage
chokes on the code
On 3/2/11 12:04 PM, sm123123 wrote:
Is there any way to handle scientific precision in base 10 in a simple
way, using sage ?
Yes. You could just use normal floating point numbers and then give the
output format. This would use 53-bit precision for the calculations,
but then the printing wo
On Wednesday, March 2, 2011 10:04:39 AM UTC-8, sm123123 wrote:
>
> Is there any way to handle scientific precision in base 10 in a simple
> way, using sage ?
>
> Alternatively, are there any libraries that will do something like
> that ?
>
> Using \sage{RIF10(RR10(#1))} in a LaTeX document (#
Is there any way to handle scientific precision in base 10 in a simple
way, using sage ?
Alternatively, are there any libraries that will do something like
that ?
Using \sage{RIF10(RR10(#1))} in a LaTeX document (#1 is the argument)
leaves numbers like 6.0421?e-27. Use of question marks like that
No.
I use matlab extensively for data analysis and have a large library of
code already written in matlab.
I do not want to invest the time required in porting all that.
On Mar 1, 12:16 pm, Maxim wrote:
> I'm affraid I cannot help you on the Matlab front (I don't have it
> installed), but have
I'm affraid I cannot help you on the Matlab front (I don't have it
installed), but have you considered using pyplot (from matplotlib)?
It's basically a clone of the Matlab plotting framework. I've used it
recently to make a semilog plot with excellent results.
On 1 mar, 12:57, sm123123 wrote:
> S
On 1 March 2011 17:57, sm123123 wrote:
> Sigh.
>
> When I issue a plot() command using the Matlab interface, I get a
> syntax error.
I think the MATLAB interface might be an optional component. Check the docs
Dave
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
Sigh.
When I issue a plot() command using the Matlab interface, I get a
syntax error.
On Mar 1, 5:43 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 at 11:32AM -0800, sm123123 wrote:
> > It seems that I was unable to convey the issue at hand. For
> > Mathematica, I can issue a Plot[] command, follow
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 at 11:32AM -0800, sm123123 wrote:
> It seems that I was unable to convey the issue at hand. For
> Mathematica, I can issue a Plot[] command, followed by an Export[] and
> then use \includegraphics to use the generated plot (the its not good
> enough section in the SageTeX manual
On 2/28/11 1:32 PM, sm123123 wrote:
Thanks for your response.
It seems that I was unable to convey the issue at hand. For
Mathematica, I can issue a Plot[] command, followed by an Export[] and
then use \includegraphics to use the generated plot (the its not good
enough section in the SageTeX man
Thanks for your response.
It seems that I was unable to convey the issue at hand. For
Mathematica, I can issue a Plot[] command, followed by an Export[] and
then use \includegraphics to use the generated plot (the its not good
enough section in the SageTeX manual).
I cannot do the same for matlab
Thanks.
Looks needlessly complicated. I did see significant errors crop up
when I tried use .n(4) etc. So, your warning is pretty wise.
Is there a way to extract the mantissa from a number (in base 10 - I
do know that sign_mantissa_exponent() does it in base 2, which is not
terribly useful).
Alt
On Sunday, February 27, 2011 8:59:25 PM UTC, sm123123 wrote:
>
> I have numerical calculations that need to adhere to significant
> digits of the input.
Sage has at least three different "real" numbers, see
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/rings_numerical.html
Each implementation is a dif
17 matches
Mail list logo
