[sage-support] Re: Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

Ticket #13892 created as suggested. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica interface has changed in V9 ?

On 12/28/12 9:47 AM, William Stein wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Volker Braun mailto:vbraun.n...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Friday, December 28, 2012 4:19:11 PM UTC, William wrote: I disagree. The only reason Sage doesn't have an interface to Mathematica written usin

Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematica

Yes, I "went" to the parallel processing talk as a webinar last year and got nothing out of it, basically a sales pitch as you say Regards, A. Jorge Garcia Applied Math & CS Baldwin SHS & Nassau CC http://shadowfaxrant.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/calcpage2009 Sent from my iPod On S

Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On 09/ 9/10 10:53 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote: Dave, I think the key point is that there are clearly companies and organizations that use python for engineering. I agree lots of companies use Python for engineering. But if that was the key point, it was not clear to me: ==

Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On 09/10/10 10:49 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote: Full disclosure: I knew about the Wolfram tour of ZA. I heard they were visiting our institute, and assumed it was the same presentation promoting Mathematica. http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/ It is not, I now found out. It is the same

Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematica

Hi On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:00:48PM -0700, Marshall Hampton wrote: > I completely agree - very well said, except that you don't actually > _need_ an internet connection to use Sage. And in fact South Africa > had rather low bandwidth when I was there (hopefully that's improved > with some new c

Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 at 06:00PM -0700, Marshall Hampton wrote: > I completely agree - very well said, except that you don't actually > _need_ an internet connection to use Sage. Well, unless you travel to the UW and plug in your USB stick into sage.math and copy a tarball over, someone will be be u

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

I completely agree - very well said, except that you don't actually _need_ an internet connection to use Sage. And in fact South Africa had rather low bandwidth when I was there (hopefully that's improved with some new cables) but Jan's lab was running Sage beautifully. -Marshall On Sep 9, 6:42 

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

> I doubt it's as extensive as the Python libraries, but then a lot of the > python > libraries are not related to science/engineering/maths. I agree with this, but I think it's a strength. Part of my research includes scraping BGP data, and there are modules for doing this in python.(Currently b

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On 9/9/10 4:53 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote: I think the key point is that there are clearly companies and organizations that use python for engineering. See http://www.python.org/about/success/ for lots of examples. Jason -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

Dave, I think the key point is that there are clearly companies and organizations that use python for engineering. Using Sage as a student gives you exposure to python. I'm sure its technically possible to use python within mathematica, but its not something you'd naturally do. So I do think th

Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On 09/ 9/10 04:41 PM, Ben Edwards wrote: I might shy away from any personal attacks on Stephen Wolfram, despite controversy as him as a scientist. This should be about comparing sage and Mathematica, not the people behind them. I think that would be *very* wise. I'm no fan of Steven Wolfram. I

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

> > On Sep 9, 11:41 am, Ben Edwards  wrote: > >> I might shy away from any personal attacks on Stephen Wolfram, despite > >> controversy as him as a scientist. This should be about comparing sage > >> and Mathematica, not the people behind them. > > > The name of the company is Wolfram as well, and

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On 9/9/10 10:54 AM, kcrisman wrote: On Sep 9, 11:41 am, Ben Edwards wrote: I might shy away from any personal attacks on Stephen Wolfram, despite controversy as him as a scientist. This should be about comparing sage and Mathematica, not the people behind them. The name of the company is Wo

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

kcrisman, No confusion, the poster included this article: >* the controversial Mr Wolfram as a scientific role model > http://chem.tufts.edu/science/Shermer/E-Skeptic/SkepticsOnWolfram.html I would say rather than include any discussion about how Dr. Wolfram practices science, steer the discussi

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On Sep 9, 11:41 am, Ben Edwards wrote: > I might shy away from any personal attacks on Stephen Wolfram, despite > controversy as him as a scientist. This should be about comparing sage > and Mathematica, not the people behind them. The name of the company is Wolfram as well, and I think that's

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

I might shy away from any personal attacks on Stephen Wolfram, despite controversy as him as a scientist. This should be about comparing sage and Mathematica, not the people behind them. One thing that is a natural advantage for me is the ability to not only use all the packages included in sage,

Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematica

Hi > >On 09/ 9/10 10:47 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > >>* the price of the software > >>http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/ > >>$139.95 even for students. I'm not sure I can convey > >>how astronomical that amount to almost all African > >>students. On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:43:41AM -05

Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On 9 September 2010 14:43, Jason Grout wrote: > On 9/9/10 6:23 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> >> On 09/ 9/10 10:47 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote: >> >>> * the price of the software >>> http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/ >>> $139.95 even for students. I'm not sure I can convey >>> how astron

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On 9/9/10 6:23 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: On 09/ 9/10 10:47 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote: * the price of the software http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/ $139.95 even for students. I'm not sure I can convey how astronomical that amount to almost all African students. Can you put it i

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica

On Sep 9, 7:23 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > On 09/ 9/10 10:47 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > > * the price of the software > >http://www.wolfram.com/events/southafrica2010/ > > $139.95 even for students. I'm not sure I can convey > > how astronomical that amount to almost all African > > stude

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica code conversion

Is this the optimal code for what I'm trying to do? On my MacBook, it takes a good minute or so before the graph appears. Not that I'm complaining... On Nov 21, 9:56 pm, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Nov 21, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > > > > > > Sterling wrote: > >> I'm trying to dupli

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica code conversion

Sterling wrote: > I'm trying to duplicate what this Mathematica code does in SAGE: > > F[z_]=4*Log[z^3]-2*Log[z^3-8] > a=ContourPlot[If[y ContourShading->False, Contours->30] > b=Plot[Sqrt[3]*x, {x, 0, 4}] > Show[a, b] > > I originally used this (this doesn't include the sqrt(3)*x line in the > c

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 6.0 Compatibility Issue

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:25 PM, mvanveen wrote: > > Dr. Stein, > > It works now! > > !math gave me enough insight into what was wrong that I was able to > repair the math file in /Applications/sage.  It looks as though it's > working now.  Thanks so much for taking the time out to help! > > Determ

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 6.0 Compatibility Issue

Dr. Stein, It works now! !math gave me enough insight into what was wrong that I was able to repair the math file in /Applications/sage. It looks as though it's working now. Thanks so much for taking the time out to help! Determining which PATH variable the documentation is referring to is a

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 6.0 Compatibility Issue

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:36 PM, mvanveen wrote: > > Hello, > > I am attempting to get my SAGE environment to interact with > Mathematica 6.0 installed in /Applications on Mac OS 10.5.8.  When I > attempt to evaluate a mathematica expression I get the following > error: > eqn = mathematica('3x + 15

[sage-support] Re: mathematica notebooks?

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:35 PM, wrote: > In a message dated 1/4/2009 10:13:33 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > tim.la...@gmail.com writes: > > You could display the notebooks with Mathematica Player and if you want > to do more with them, try and convert them to Sage. > > Thanx for the suggestion.

[sage-support] Re: mathematica notebooks?

In a message dated 1/4/2009 10:13:33 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, tim.la...@gmail.com writes: You could display the notebooks with Mathematica Player and if you want to do more with them, try and convert them to Sage. Thanx for the suggestion. Mathematica Player is an alternative, how

[sage-support] Re: mathematica notebooks?

On Jan 4, 2009, at 9:35 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote: > > Hi, I see that sage can call mathematica functions - I suppose that > only works if I have mathematica installed. > > What I'm wondering is if I can import a mathmatica notebook into sage? > We used to have mathematica at my school and I re

[sage-support] Re: mathematica notebooks?

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, wrote: > > Hi, I see that sage can call mathematica functions - I suppose that > only works if I have mathematica installed. > > What I'm wondering is if I can import a mathmatica notebook into sage? > We used to have mathematica at my school and I remember using

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica (under wine) sage interface

On Nov 21, 12:28 am, Quicksilver_Johny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Solved by installing Unix version (plus a bunch of other problems) :). Cool. Out of curiosity: Did executing "!math" from the Sage command line work when you were running MMA via wine? Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica (under wine) sage interface

Solved by installing Unix version (plus a bunch of other problems) :). On Nov 20, 6:45 pm, Quicksilver_Johny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am currently running Mathematica through wine on Ubuntu. > From the command line: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wine "C:\Program Files\Wolfram Research\Mathematica

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 7 coming

William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Jason Grout > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I just received this in an email from Wolfram: >> >> Dear Mathematica User, >> >> Soon we will release Mathematica 7! As a Premier Service > It's out now: http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathema

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 7 coming

I am planning on asking for a vote to include biopython as standard after its 1.49 release, which completes a transition from it using Numeric to numpy. Currently the interact wiki gives a poor impression of what is possible with sage and bioinformatics, since the examples I put there avoid using

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 7 coming

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > William Stein wrote: >>> * Vector and field visualization >> >> New? I wonder how? It seems like they have had this for a long time. > > There are lots of cool visualations you could do with vector fields that > they don

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 7 coming

On Nov 14, 3:41 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * New computable data, including genomic data, protein data, and > > current and historical weather data > > Cool.   I wonder what the license issues are with making such data > available?  Can somebody look into this? > It is

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 7 coming

William Stein wrote: >> * Vector and field visualization > > New? I wonder how? It seems like they have had this for a long time. There are lots of cool visualations you could do with vector fields that they don't have yet. For example, see the following (sorry, these are from a sage Fro

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 7 coming

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just received this in an email from Wolfram: > > Dear Mathematica User, > > Soon we will release Mathematica 7! As a Premier Service Yeah! > subscriber, you will receive a download link enabling you to > immediately ac

[sage-support] Re: Mathematica 7 coming

Yep, I got the same message. As much as I like mathematica, I'm spending more time learning the features of sage because of it's accessibility to my students. Sure, mathematica is more polished and feature rich, but the philosophy behind sage and the tireless contributions by it's many auth