Craig Citro wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
>> Every thing works ok. I already did a proof with one object and there
>> was no problem. There was no DeprecationWarning.
>>
>> Thanks a lot, you're a genius man.
>>
>
> Awesome! I'm glad you got those objects loaded. :)
>
>> Do you know the sagetex package? I
Hi Alex,
> Every thing works ok. I already did a proof with one object and there
> was no problem. There was no DeprecationWarning.
>
> Thanks a lot, you're a genius man.
>
Awesome! I'm glad you got those objects loaded. :)
> Do you know the sagetex package? I followed the directions to use the
Hi cc,
Every thing works ok. I already did a proof with one object and there
was no problem. There was no DeprecationWarning.
Thanks a lot, you're a genius man.
I'll abuse of your amability, and ask a new question. Please, if you
do not have time, don't worry. I know you are very busy with your
Hi Alex,
> All the objects have the same general shape as the one posted. The
> option (2) it is ok. I do not want you spend much time with my
> problem.
>
Excellent -- (2) was definitely the easier plan for me. :) I've posted
a patch here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/craigcitro/fix-f
Hi cc,
All the objects have the same general shape as the one posted. The
option (2) it is ok. I do not want you spend much time with my
problem.
Alex
On 2 mar, 12:21, Craig Citro wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Well, I have one question first before deciding the right way to
> proceed. Are all the ob
Hi cc,
All the objects have the same general shape as the one posted. The
option (2) it is ok. I do not want you spend much time with my
problem.
Alex
On 2 mar, 12:21, Craig Citro wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Well, I have one question first before deciding the right way to
> proceed. Are all the ob
Hi Alex,
Well, I have one question first before deciding the right way to
proceed. Are all the objects you're creating the same general shape as
the ones in the test.sobj you posted -- collections of polynomials
over rational function fields in one variable over finite fields? If
so, then we have
Hey Craig,
I have 3.2.3 in my laptop, but I use the machines of the University
(which have 3.1.1) to do computations that take long time.
---Alex
On 2 mar, 11:19, Craig Citro wrote:
> Ah, does this mean you have a running copy of 3.1.1 still? Because I
> think it'll be easier to give you a pa
Ah, does this mean you have a running copy of 3.1.1 still? Because I
think it'll be easier to give you a patch against 3.1.1 than a patch
against 3.2.3 ...
-cc
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Alex Lara wrote:
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Thanks for explanation, it was clear. Now I have six files, but the
Hi Craig,
Thanks for explanation, it was clear. Now I have six files, but the
program is still running and will generate more files. So, I would
love you can explain me how to fix the problem.
Thanks,
Alex
On 1 mar, 23:41, Craig Citro wrote:
> >> From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved s
Hi Burcin,
> The error I get when I try to load the .sobj file linked above in
> Sage-3.3 is:
>
> ...
> /home/burcin/sage/sage-3.3/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/structure/sage_object.so
> in sage.structure.sage_object.loads
> (sage/structure/sage_object.c:6156)()
>
> RuntimeError: (None,
Hi Craig,
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:41:08 -0800
Craig Citro wrote:
>
> >> From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I
> >> could open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was
> >> created by a sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and
> >> when I tried to op
>> From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I could
>> open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was created by a
>> sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and when I tried to open
>> it on sage 3.2.3. Here you will find that object:
>> http://math.arizona.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Alex Lara wrote:
>
> From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I could
> open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was created by a
> sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and when I tried to open
> it on sage 3.2.3. Here you
>From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I could
open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was created by a
sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and when I tried to open
it on sage 3.2.3. Here you will find that object:
http://math.arizona.edu/~alara/tes
Hi Alex,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Alex Lara wrote:
>
> I'm using Sage 3.2.3. I can't load objects created and saved with Sage
> 3.1.1. I got the following message:
> DeprecationWarning: Your data is stored in an old format. Please use
> the save() function to store your data in a more re
16 matches
Mail list logo
