Hi cc, All the objects have the same general shape as the one posted. The option (2) it is ok. I do not want you spend much time with my problem.
Alex On 2 mar, 12:21, Craig Citro <craigci...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Well, I have one question first before deciding the right way to > proceed. Are all the objects you're creating the same general shape as > the ones in the test.sobj you posted -- collections of polynomials > over rational function fields in one variable over finite fields? If > so, then we have two options; if not, we probably only have option > (2). > > (1) We can patch 3.2.3, so you can load the objects in 3.2.3. I'll > then write a function that will take the objects, recreate > corresponding objects in 3.2.3, coerce the old ones over, and re-save > them. This isn't so bad, but it depends on me knowing exactly what > kind of objects you've got. It's slightly more error-prone, I think. > > (2) We build and patch 3.1.1, and you just load and save each object. > Then they should load fine in 3.2.3. > > Which seems better to you? (I think (2) is slightly easier for me, but > nominally more work for you -- you have to build 3.1.1 on your > laptop.) > > -cc > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Alex Lara <lrodr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey Craig, > > > I have 3.2.3 in my laptop, but I use the machines of the University > > (which have 3.1.1) to do computations that take long time. > > > ---Alex > > > On 2 mar, 11:19, Craig Citro <craigci...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ah, does this mean you have a running copy of 3.1.1 still? Because I > >> think it'll be easier to give you a patch against 3.1.1 than a patch > >> against 3.2.3 ... > > >> -cc > > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Alex Lara <lrodr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Hi Craig, > > >> > Thanks for explanation, it was clear. Now I have six files, but the > >> > program is still running and will generate more files. So, I would > >> > love you can explain me how to fix the problem. > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > ----Alex > > >> > On 1 mar, 23:41, Craig Citro <craigci...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> From command line of Sage 3.1.1, I saved some object, and then I > >> >> >> could > >> >> >> open it with sage 3.2.3. Next I open test.sobj (this was created by a > >> >> >> sage program) in sage 3.1.1, saved it again, and when I tried to > >> >> >> open > >> >> >> it on sage 3.2.3. Here you will find that > >> >> >> object:http://math.arizona.edu/~alara/test.sobj > > >> >> >> ----Alex > > >> >> > Thanks. I'll take a look at it. I've also CC'd Craig Citro who most > >> >> > likely knows what is going on here. > > >> >> > --Mike > > >> >> Hi Alex, > > >> >> Yeah, this one is going to be a little bit annoying to fix. Here's > >> >> what's going on: in between 3.1.1 and 3.2.3, fraction fields got moved > >> >> over to the new coercion model. This is good, but as it happens, the > >> >> switch was done in such a way that it caused the pre-existing pickles > >> >> to not load correctly (which is exactly what you're seeing). There's > >> >> probably a clean and classy way to fix this, and I'll be happy to look > >> >> at it carefully in a few weeks if no one beats me to it (I'm busy > >> >> trying to finish up my thesis). This is now trac #5419. > > >> >> In the interim, you probably want to hack something together so that > >> >> you can load your pickles. I managed to make sage 3.2.3 load the > >> >> pickles, but it's a pretty ugly hack, and you'll still need to re-save > >> >> the objects as newer pickles (which actually has one or two more > >> >> wrinkles), so that you don't have to deal with this in the short term. > >> >> How many of these files are there? If it's just a few, e-mail them to > >> >> me off-list, and I'll just re-pickle them in a newer format and send > >> >> them back to you. If there are more than that, I'll carefully explain > >> >> how you can fix them yourself. :) > > >> >> -cc --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
