On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 at 11:33AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> Susi wrote:
> > Thanks for the answer, well, I violated a basic rule: Don't use new
> > systems too early. I will wait for the upgrade and hopefully it won't
> > take too long. I'm specifically intersted in using Sagetex but it
> > won't wo
Susi wrote:
> Thanks for the answer, well, I violated a basic rule: Don't use new
> systems too early. I will wait for the upgrade and hopefully it won't
> take too long. I'm specifically intersted in using Sagetex but it
> won't work without Sage.
>
If I recall correctly, sagetex now can work w
Thanks for the answer, well, I violated a basic rule: Don't use new
systems too early. I will wait for the upgrade and hopefully it won't
take too long. I'm specifically intersted in using Sagetex but it
won't work without Sage.
Swanhild
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To po
Hi Swanhild,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Susi
wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer, yes, I do use a mac
> OS X 10.6 (snow leopard)
> and the Sage version is
> sage-4.1.1-OSX10.5-intel-64bit
Snow Leopard is pretty new. The binary you used was built on O
Thanks for your answer, yes, I do use a mac
OS X 10.6 (snow leopard)
and the Sage version is
sage-4.1.1-OSX10.5-intel-64bit
Sage has no problem with (simple) calculation, I already tried that
and it works fine.
Swanhild
--~--~-~--~~---
I guess you are using a mac, but can you tell us what version the OS is and
what version of Sage you are running? Is it a binary, for example?
(This might help others on the list diagnose the problem.)
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Swanhild Bernstein
wrote:
>
> Hallo,
>
> I'm new to sage and
