[sage-support] Re: Animation speed question

2008-03-04 Thread dean moore
When I used *step = 0.095*, I have 64 frames, close enough to the wikipedia image's of 66. But resultant animation is "choppy," where wikipedia's is fairly smooth. I tinkered with a spline to smooth out a different curve, but it ran fantastically slow, -- something about too many points? -- so g

[sage-support] Re: Animation speed question

2008-03-02 Thread Carl Witty
On Mar 1, 1:09 pm, "dean moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I wrote the code living at I > was inspired by the > wikipedia image (made via MuPAD) on the page at > > (permalink >

[sage-support] Re: Animation speed question

2008-03-01 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 1, 5:46 pm, "dean moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ... *delay=20, delay=n* info ... > > > > > Thanks. I have a parameter called *delayBetweenImages*, set to 0, > > and tried manually setting delay = 0. Sa

[sage-support] Re: Animation speed question

2008-03-01 Thread Carl Witty
On Mar 1, 5:46 pm, "dean moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... *delay=20, delay=n* info ... > > Thanks. I have a parameter called *delayBetweenImages*, set to 0, > and tried manually setting delay = 0. Same thing -- a slowish image. > Tried *delayBetweenImages *= 5, *delayBetweenImages *= 20