On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 1, 5:46 pm, "dean moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ... *delay=20, delay=n* info ... > > > > > Thanks. I have a parameter called *delayBetweenImages*, set to 0, > > and tried manually setting delay = 0. Same thing -- a slowish image. > > Tried *delayBetweenImages *= 5, *delayBetweenImages *= 20 -- same thing. > > Image slow, slower than the wikipedia image. The MuPAD package seems > > written at least partly in C/C++ & maybe faster than SAGE, at least largely > > written in Python. But how can that affect the speed of the final image? > > The speed of MuPAD vs. Sage won't affect the animation speed of the > image. > > I think we need to see the actual code you're using before we can help > further.
I think all of his code is here: https://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1687/ I probably just screwed up somehow (when implementing animate) with the convert command line, I guess, which is maybe messing up the delay. I don't know. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
