Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Not sure if this helps, but one way of saving images in a batch process
> is to create a unique name within the loop that creates the plots and
> save the image using this name. For example, if the loop increments the
> integer i, and the images are created using matplo
Not sure if this helps, but one way of saving images in a batch process
is to create a unique name within the loop that creates the plots and
save the image using this name. For example, if the loop increments the
integer i, and the images are created using matplotlib (pylab) include
the follo
Hum... I talked to my colleague again today and convinced him to give
SAGE a try and to produce the animation using ffmpeg.
Now the question is: in sage is it possible to save the sequences of
images as a batch process (verses saving them one-by-one by hand)?
Also he wonders if it possible to s
Thanks, but I forgot to say my colleague has actually looked into Jmol
and his conclusion is that the language is a bit too "Chemistry
oriented" for him. That's why he goes back to use Mathematica.
I surely hope SAGE can tap into the power of Jmol in a not too distant
future. Meanwhile we will gi
pong wrote:
> A colleague of mine would like to produce some 3D animation (an
> illustration involving cones and spheres). He looked into SAGE and
> said it will be difficult compare to Mathematica and so he decided to
> use the latter.
>
> By reading this group, I understand one can render the i
