I've just installed Sagemath 9.6 (Release Date: 2022-05-15) on my Mac
running macOS 12.4. If I create a new Sagemath Jupyter notebook starting
from Sagemath, everything seems to work fine. However, I'd like to start by
just running "jupyter notebook" at the command line. When I do this and
cre
I had the same problem, but I noticed during my install it was incomplete,
although it said it was complete, I just repeatedly installed it until I
saw the script finish.
On Sunday, January 5, 2020 at 1:39:50 PM UTC-6, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>
> When I open SageMath-9.0.app under macOS Catall
You need to go into your Preferences under privacy and security, general,
and allow Python 3.7 to install. Also it took me about six times
restarting the installer, you could watch it stepping through the install
then halting, I'd start again, and again, but it ran fine afterwards, even
better
der Fedora Linux
v29 and that was using even a slower processor.
On Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 1:18:06 PM UTC-6, dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:56:45PM -0600, Thomas McMillan wrote:
> > Thanks, Richard. I’m currently running Sage from a terminal with th
Forgot to add I am currently running 10.15.1
On Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 11:41:57 AM UTC-6, Richard W Bump wrote:
>
> On my late 2012 Mac-mini with a 2.6GHZ quad core I7 processor it takes
> about 3 minutes to load from the desktop ICON. I loaded 8.9 under the
> previous (10.1
On my late 2012 Mac-mini with a 2.6GHZ quad core I7 processor it takes
about 3 minutes to load from the desktop ICON. I loaded 8.9 under the
previous (10.13.?) version and it did take several minutes, probably at
least 15 minutes, to organize and start. The last few versions of SageMath
have
I'm running on 10.14.6 and as far as I know I am having no issues. I'm
running on a late 2012 mac-mini intel I7 2.6 ghz processor. It starts a
bit slow, but not much slower than the previous version. Sometimes I have
port issues but that is my problem and I just stop SageMath and stop the
po
Not a question, just a For Your Information.
If you have an Apache server instance running there may be a conflict
requiring you to modify your "httpd-vhosts.conf" file. You may need to add
something like this with being the port number Sage is trying to run
on. The "ServerName" doesn't
That worked, thanks, I didn’t have that maps to command in my pocket.
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> {x\mapsto "+latex(e)+"}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop r
me the numerator and denominator
style answer and in raw values, and not a decimal value which can be misleading.
I’ve played around with Jupyter, I’ve must get into the mind set to switch
over. Sage notebook seems more straight forward.
Again, Thank you.
Richard Bump
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 3
...@gmail.com> wrote:On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 5:30:09 PM UTC, richard...@gmail.com wrote:I'm using a text() entry annotating a plot. for this you do not need TeX installed on your machine. The rendering of graphics in text("$x^$",...) is done by MathJax.(as you never pro
book you can have markdown cells, and they support formulae
> written in (La)TeX.
>
>
> On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 2:46:01 PM UTC, richard...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> This didn't fix the problem. I wonder if I have to perform a Macport
>> install of Texlive,
y sooner or later).
> In jupyter notebook you can have markdown cells, and they support formulae
> written in (La)TeX.
>
>
> On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 2:46:01 PM UTC, richard...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> This didn't fix the problem. I wonder if I have to
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 4:40:27 AM UTC, richard...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> In SageNotebook I am trying to use %latex to format my data and a formula
>> and when I select evaluate I get the pdflatex error. sagetex is installed.
&
In SageNotebook I am trying to use %latex to format my data and a formula
and when I select evaluate I get the pdflatex error. sagetex is installed.
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 10:17:52 AM UTC-6, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Please describe the problem you have.
> Are you trying to use sagete
I have the same problem running OS 10.12.3, TexLive 2016, and SageMath
7.5.1 app. The later two appear to be correctly installed. I have
followed all the steps for the paths. I have added symbolic links inside
of the app with no success. I can only speculate that it may be a problem
related
Compiled.
-Original Message-
From: sage-support@googlegroups.com [mailto:sage-support@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Keshav Kini
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:26 AM
To: sage-support@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sage-support] Re: I don't know how to handle this compilation
error
&qu
error
"Richard Bentley" writes:
> I'm new to this group, so I'm not sure if I reply directly to you (as I am
> doing now). Please inform me if I should post this reply on the forum.
Well, the standard is to reply to the whole list. But as you can see,
Google Groups is se
May 12, 2012 5:42 AM
To: sage-support@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sage-support] Re: I don't know how to handle this compilation
error
Richard Bentley writes:
> The package seemed to compile, but at the end after running internal
checks and cleaning up, it gave me the following message:
>
ckage /usr/local/sage/sage-x.y.z./spkg/standard/extcode-4.8.spkg
...
-rw-r--r-- 1 richard richard 12186743 2012-01-19 22:43
/usr/local/sage/sage-x.y.z./spkg/standard/extcode-4.8.spkg
Finished extraction
There is no spkg-install script, no setup.py, and no configure script,
so I do not know how
: There was an error building c_lib.
make: *** [build] Error 1"
???
-Richard
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Scientific linux is based off Redhat enterprise. Fedora is generally newer
> and more cutting edge. New libraries get tested in Fedora and then make
> their
.x86_64
glibc-common-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64
glibc-headers-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64
glibc-utils-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64
So it's looking for a glibc earlier/older than what I have now?
Or is GLIBC_2.14 a different thing than glibc-2.5-81?
Thanks,
-Richard
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Benjamin Jo
Problem solved with workaround.
I tried to compile sage-4.6.1 in a fresh directory again this time without
using
export MAKE="make -j12".
It appears that the parallel compile was causing the issue.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th
Hi.
> Either python did not compile correctly
I am using a Gentoo Linux system and the Python I use and the system uses was
compiled on the local system. I think Python compiles on my system.
> or your sage library/tarball is corrupted,
I just ran md5sum I get:
ed8da4723f072035a1f43bd30118aa5
Thanks for the reply.
The end of install.log looks good:
...
Successfully installed sage-4.6.1
Now cleaning up tmp files.
Making Sage/Python scripts relocatable...
Making script relocatable
Finished installing sage-4.6.1.spkg
I also tried the sage-ba. The end of that looks like:
===
>
> You might also want to repost this on sage-devel, since there might be
> some Gentoo users who read that and not sage-support.
>
> -M. Hampton
>
> On Jan 17, 8:36 pm, Richard wrote:
>> After compiling sage-4.6.1 (again), without errors in install.log, I try
&
I am NOT using the ebuild.
I just downloaded sage-4.6.1.tar, created a /usr/local/sage-4.6.1
directory, chowned that directory to my user, un-tared it, executed
'export MAKE="make -j12"' then 'make > make.out 2>&1' and then a few
hours later tried to run it with './sage'. I'll try compiling it
After compiling sage-4.6.1 (again), without errors in install.log, I try
to start up sage and get the following:
/usr/local/sage-4.6.1]$ ./sage
--
| Sage Version 4.6.1, Release Date: 2011-01-11 |
| Type note
om sage.rings.all import *
File
"/usr/local/sage-4.6.1/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/all.py",
line 93, in
from qqbar import (AlgebraicRealField, is_AlgebraicRealField, AA,
...
=
I'll post all of the errors at the end of make.out if it will hel
Thanks. I started the compile of Sage-4.6.1 again from a fresh un-tar
and did NOT use "SAGE_CHECK". The compile went much further without error.
Richard
On 01/14/2011 07:43 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 7:22 am, Richard wrote:
>> I am trying to compile Sage f
*
Error testing package ** python-2.6.4.p9 **
*
sage: An error occurred while testing python-2.6.4.p9
=
Any suggestions on getting Sage to build would be appreciated. If I
need to send more information please
yper-threading
turned on
make > make.out 2>&1 &
See attached file, make.out-260 with is the last 260 lines of make.out
--
When I try to run sage using ./sage I receive pages of errors. See
attached sage-run.out
Any assistance on successfully compiling Sage would be app
ore information please let me know.
(I did NOT have trouble when I compiled Sage 4.4.3)
On 08/08/2010 02:17 PM, Richard wrote:
> I am trying to build Sage 4.5.2 and the build dies near the end:
>
>sage: install_scripts('/usr/local/bin')
> at the Sage command
I am trying to build Sage 4.5.2 and the build dies near the end:
sage: install_scripts('/usr/local/bin')
at the Sage command prompt.
To build the documentation, run
make doc
Sage build/upgrade complete!
./sage -docbuild all html 2>&1 | tee -a dochtml.log
sphinx-build -b html -d
/usr/loca
all. Calculating by hand, I got d/dz *
laplace(f(t,z), t, s). (Applying Leibniz' rule here)
Now, if I use the exact same code as above, but change the function
definition from:
f = function ('f', z, t)
to
f = function ('f', t, z)
I get
D[0](laplace)(f(t, z), t, s)
her way to solve my system of ODEs using SAGE? I need
to work with those equations in systems biology class.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
tion ('X', t)
S = function ('S', X)
def mu (S):
return (mu_max * S) / (K_S + S)
dXdt = diff (X, t) == mu(S) * X
dSdt = diff (S, t) == -mu(S) * X / Y_XS
desolve_system ([dXdt, dSdt], [X, S], ics = [0, X_0, S_0])
Richard
--
To post to thi
Forgot to mention: This is SAGE 4.5.1.
Richard
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
:
TypeError: Error executing code in Maxima
CODE:
sage7 : atvalue(sage1,sage5,sage6)$
Maxima ERROR:
Improper argument to atvalue:
['X(t)]
Thanks,
Richard
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To uns
You can do this in Maxima. There is an external add-on package that can
integrate piecewise functions call pw.mac that
I wrote. I don't know how to port it to Sage though.
You would do it this way in Maxima.
load(pw)$
assume(a>0,b<0,c>0)$
define(p(x), piecewise([-a,(3*b*x^2+3*c)/(6*a*c+2*a^3*
40 matches
Mail list logo
