On 08/27/2014 08:30 AM, kcrisman wrote:
A failure ? Why ?
See http://sagemath.blogspot.com/
However, note that this is with respect to a very high goal indeed,
which is to replicate every last bit of functionality in the programs
mentioned in the mission statement.
It is a very high
On Feb 26, 7:35 pm, "Joel B. Mohler" wrote:
> After having been a heavy sage user for several years, I now have
> virtually not touched it for several more years. Returning now on a
> lark, I'm feeling rather confused because I'd think the following
> would obvio
After having been a heavy sage user for several years, I now have
virtually not touched it for several more years. Returning now on a
lark, I'm feeling rather confused because I'd think the following
would obviously work. My goal is to factor a bunch of Gaussian
integers.
sage: K.=QuadraticField
On Thursday 29 October 2009 05:10:38 pm JJWMac wrote:
> Back in February, Marshall Hampton posted in response to a query about
> reading a csv file.
>
>
> I am tempted to open a ticket in trac for some sort of read_csv
> command, which might behave like the following (NOTE: this i
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 06:10:16 pm cesarnda wrote:
> but usually they give 5 spaces instead of 4
That's not the "usually" that I experience. But, even if it is what your
editor does, it is almost certainly configurable.
--
Joel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To po
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 01:37:40 pm Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I'm using XEmacs in Python mode. Indentation is then automatic.
>
> I think the question is about changing the indenting of a large block
> of existing Pyth
On Thursday 21 August 2008 01:58:23 pm Mike Witt wrote:
> I'm looking for a work-around for the situation where I would normally
> call parametric_plot (or plot, for that matter) with a function, and in
> some particular case that function turns out to evaluate to a constant.
>
> For example:
>
>
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 02:10:35 am Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 at 08:10PM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> > Final comment - are both related to
> > sage: parametric_plot((0,t),0,1)
> > not working, which is consistent with
> > sage: plot(1)
> > not returning a horizontal line, but (sort of)
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 05:44:31 pm William Stein wrote:
> > Probably if you make some changes to the plotting code,
> > and make some scripts that generate a bunch of plots give
> > different parameters, and show improvements, everyone would
> > agree to commit those changes!
> >
> > If you wh
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 05:20:47 pm Joel B. Mohler wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 April 2008 04:45:16 pm alex clemesha wrote:
> > With respect to the 'goal' of Sage's plotting (follow Mma),
> > I would say this is definitley a bug.
> >
> > People with 'viol
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 04:45:16 pm alex clemesha wrote:
> With respect to the 'goal' of Sage's plotting (follow Mma),
> I would say this is definitley a bug.
>
> People with 'violent' feelings about this apsect of the plotting
> might want to change certain features of the plot code once and for
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 11:55, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Axel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How can I specify the range of y coordinates in a 2d plot? I tried
> >
> > show(plot(sin(x),-10,10),ymin=-0.5, ymax=0.5,frame=true)
> >
> > but the actual plot goes between
Hi,
The following snippet is from 2.9.3. What does the 'order' parameter do? I
thought it affected the order in which monomials appear in the string
representation. I wanted x^2+1 to print as '1+x^2' (i.e. small degree
appears first).
sage: R.=PolynomialRing(QQ,order="degrevlex")
sage: R.
On Thursday 20 December 2007 14:28, gani wrote:
> Hi, I had an interesting question today when I was trying to introduce
> SAGE to some of my colleagues. A person asked - can sage be imported
> as a module into python? Can it? please let me know.
Yes, with some caveats. The biggest one is that t
When I save a plot to a file (.eps), it saves with ungainly margins. It seems
like there is often a huge blank space at the top. I don't want to have an
axes
or frame in my finished output, but when I do turn on the axes and frame to
investigate the origins of this margin, it appears like it
Hi,
I'm making a collection of graphics for a paper and want them to have similar
properties through-out. So, I have an outline of the figure and internal
lines and I want a theme through-out (For example, I want all the circles to
be red solid lines and the diameters to be black dashed lines
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 13:05, Simon King wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > > When i take a 4x4 matrix over GF(7) with n=101, test function 1
> > > needs 92.50 s CPU time, but test function 2 only needs 1.49 s CPU
> > > time!
> > > Hence, in that case, MeatAxe (actually a very old version!!) appe
Hi,
I'm really impressed with the symbolic module. It's remarkably robust and
useful -- and feels much better than maxima by itself ever did to me.
My question is this: I have a large polynomial-ish expression which I'm
outputting to latex. I'd rather have it printed with the constant term
On Thursday 06 September 2007 08:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So it seems like LONG_BIT is correctly defined (as 64, in this case)
> at that stage of the compilation, but somewhere along the way it gets
> redefined incorrectly. Maybe in scons somewhere?
If scons is forgetting something (which I
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 20:54, William Stein wrote:
> > sage: M. = FreeMonoid(2)
> > sage: (x*y).substitute(x=1)
> > x*y # I would think that this is 1*y
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I find that result unsatisfactory as well, but I sure don't have a good
> > idea about what ring (?) the result '1*y
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 18:47, William Stein wrote:
> Or maybe you really want a free monoid?
>
> sage: M. = FreeMonoid(2)
> sage: x*y*x*x*y
> x*y*x^2*y
> sage: (x*y*x*x*y)^3
> x*y*x^2*y*x*y*x^2*y*x*y*x^2*y
Yes, so I found FreeMonoid after sending my first e-mail and was testing it
out.
Hi,
I'm wishing for a ZZ[x,y] where xy!=yx, but I can't seem to find the way to
construct such a creature. Is it not yet implemented?
In reality, I really only want a monomial so it pretty much boils down to a
free group on x and y, but the polynomial ring would make for some pretty
syntax e
.c is unchanged between 2.8.2 and
> 2.8.3[.3], but:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work2]$ diff -urN sage-2.8.2/devel/c_lib/src/stdsage.h
> sage-2.8.3.4/devel/sage-main/c_lib/stdsage.h
> --- sage-2.8.2/devel/c_lib/src/stdsage.h2007-08-24
> 16:27:03.00000 +0200
> +++ sage-2.
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 17:58, William Stein wrote:
> Does using the linbox package posted here work?
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/lj/
>
> Download that and do
>sage -f linbox-20070814.spkg
Yes, that appears to fix my problem.
Thanks
--
Joel
--~--~-~--~~---
Alex,
Did you find a solution for this? I got the same error on my gentoo as well.
I see you have later posts which make it appear that you have sage-2.8
installed.
--
Joel
On Monday 13 August 2007 11:47, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile sage-2.8 and it breaks down on linb
On Saturday 09 June 2007 13:16, William Stein wrote:
> It would be more natural to write "assume(n in ZZ)", but this won't work,
> since "n in ZZ" gets evaluated to false be Python before it gets passed
> to the assume command.
This was exactly what I tried when the original e-mail was sent out a
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 15:27, William Stein wrote:
> Now *that* is a crystal clear suggestion. This would be trivial to
> implement. Here's the current situation.
> In devel/sage/sage there are three files: all.py, all_cmdline.py, and
> all_notebook.py
> When you do "from sage.all import *" e
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 14:00, Bobby Moretti wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 May 2007 12:14, William Stein wrote:
> > > On 5/30/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > There is currently no function to clear these,
> > > > > so I j
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 12:14, William Stein wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There is currently no function to clear these,
> > > so I just wrote one. The attached patch adds a function clear_vars()
> > > that when
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 23:50, William Stein wrote:
> > Is there a global
> > toggle to turn on/off this behavior? I can see the value of this in an
> > interactive setting, but when programming I would sometimes rather get
> > an error when trying to refer to a previously undefined object.
>
> The
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:09:47PM -, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Thanks very much for the explanation. Yes, I know of:
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/html/tut/node48.html#sec:standalone
>
> But as Timothy said, I want to use it like this:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
>
> import sys
> from sa
On Monday 26 March 2007 07:44, Nikos Apostolakis wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> has anybody tried to implement something like "Maple TA" in sage?
> For example I would like to have students take placement exams with
> "free form" answers.
>
> In case you don't know what Maple TA is:
Actually, if your
On Monday 26 March 2007 07:44, Nikos Apostolakis wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> has anybody tried to implement something like "Maple TA" in sage?
> For example I would like to have students take placement exams with
> "free form" answers.
>
> In case you don't know what Maple TA is:
I'm interested in
Now that I've more thoroughly read the reference manual and understand more
the logical structure of how to do thing, I'm even more impressed with the
plotting.
One question lingers though: Is there any way to include gridlines with-out
coding my own? I've been enraged at maple for not suppo
On Saturday 10 February 2007 10:20, David Joyner wrote:
> Is this what you want?
>
> sage: f = lambda x:1/x
> sage: p = plot(f(x),-4,4)
> sage: show(p,xmin=-4,xmax=4,ymin=-4,ymax=4)
Hmm, now I feel stupid ... I shouldn't have read the documentation. Neither
the "show??" or "plot??" documentatio
I spent some time trying to make a pretty plot for my calculus quiz -- a plot
of y=1/x. Ideally, I wanted a plot from -4..4 with range -4..4.
Unfortunately, the plot command calculates the range intelligently and I
could find no way to modify that behavior. Did I miss it?
I must say that I
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:22:46AM -0500, didier deshommes wrote:
>
> On 2/8/07, Luis Finotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks! I could not find that in the Reference Manual...
> >
> > On the other hand, it seems that Sage (or Python) does not handle
> > equality of reals very well:
>
> Hi
On Saturday 03 February 2007 05:09, William Stein wrote:
> That's a genuine bug, since x^maxima(3/4) is not 2. It's now trac #239:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu:9002/sage_trac/ticket/239
Is this the same bug? The types involved seem very diverse, but the strange
result appears remarkab
38 matches
Mail list logo
