[sage-support] Re: Issue with finding rank of a 255 x 121 dense matrix over GF(5)

2011-08-07 Thread Jacob Schlather
: On Aug 7, 3:37 pm, William Stein wrote: > For the record you might as well post the output of > >  cat /proc/cpuinfo > > On Sunday, August 7, 2011, Jacob Schlather > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I haven't deleted my sage binary yet, so I went ahe

[sage-support] Re: Issue with finding rank of a 255 x 121 dense matrix over GF(5)

2011-08-07 Thread Jacob Schlather
I haven't deleted my sage binary yet, so I went ahead and tested it to see if I can also recreate that error and indeed it will also segfault for M = random_matrix(QQ,600,600), trying to find the rank or kernel. On Aug 7, 4:49 am, Volker Braun wrote: > On Sunday, August 7, 2011 7:27:36 AM UTC+1

[sage-support] Re: Issue with finding rank of a 255 x 121 dense matrix over GF(5)

2011-08-06 Thread Jacob Schlather
Compiling the source seems to have fixed it. Thanks for the help. On Aug 6, 4:29 am, William Stein wrote: > On Saturday, August 6, 2011, Jacob Schlather > wrote: > > >>It sounds like your copy of Sage is incorrectly installed.  It would > >>be helpful to provide tons

[sage-support] Re: Issue with finding rank of a 255 x 121 dense matrix over GF(5)

2011-08-06 Thread Jacob Schlather
r example). So it's definitely an issue with my install or that I'm still running python 2.6.6. Perhaps updating to 3.0 will fix it. On Aug 6, 3:05 am, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Jacob Schlather > > wrote: > > I'm having a bit of a strange is

[sage-support] Issue with finding rank of a 255 x 121 dense matrix over GF(5)

2011-08-05 Thread Jacob Schlather
I'm having a bit of a strange issue, I'm working on something where I need to find the rank of a somewhat large matrix over a finite field. I recall testing sage's capabilities when I was looking at how I was going to take the rank and remember sage taking the rank of matrices much larger than the