Sure processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 23 model name : Genuine Intel(R) CPU U7300 @ 1.30GHz stepping : 10 cpu MHz : 800.000 cache size : 3072 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority bogomips : 2678.24 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 23 model name : Genuine Intel(R) CPU U7300 @ 1.30GHz stepping : 10 cpu MHz : 800.000 cache size : 3072 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 apicid : 1 initial apicid : 1 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority bogomips : 2678.01 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: On Aug 7, 3:37 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > For the record you might as well post the output of > > cat /proc/cpuinfo > > On Sunday, August 7, 2011, Jacob Schlather <jacob.schlat...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I haven't deleted my sage binary yet, so I went ahead and tested it to > > see if I can also recreate that error and indeed it will also segfault > > for M = random_matrix(QQ,600,600), trying to find the rank or kernel. > > > On Aug 7, 4:49 am, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sunday, August 7, 2011 7:27:36 AM UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote: > > >> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11581 > > >> That crash was literally in atlas, so its almost certainly due to some > isa > >> extension that the computer doesn't have. > > >> The new atlas-3.8.4 spkg tries to respect the SAGE_FAT_BINARY variable, > so > >> it would be interesting to see if a binary build with it works. > > > -- > > To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> For more options, visit this group > at > > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support > > > URL:http://www.sagemath.org > > -- > William Stein > Professor of Mathematics > University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
