:05 PM, Chris Bradley <
chris.patrick.brad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm new to Sage so forgive me if this is a dumb question but does Sage
> deal with two-point tensors? By this I mean a second order tensor with one
> contravariant index in the tangent space
/ \del X. All I've managed to find, documentation wise, involves
creating tensors from the tangent/cotangent space of a single manifold
rather than a tensor from the tangent space of M and the tangent space of
S. Thanks in advance.
Best wishes
Chris
--
You received this message be
OK, thanks. I've just added
alias sage="/Applications/SageMath-8.5.app/sage"
to .bash_profile, and everything is working smoothly.
Sorry that this turned out to be not a sage question but a pseudo-Unix
question.
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 12:41:55 PM UTC+3, Chris Brav
with error -43.
So somehow it wants to find Sage.app, rather than SageMath-8.5.app.
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 12:19:54 PM UTC+3, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 9:16 AM Chris Brav > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks! Now it works with macaulay2.
>
Thanks! Now it works with macaulay2.
As for ln, I was following the directions in the install directions. I'll
sort that out separately.
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 12:12:32 PM UTC+3, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 21:08 Chris Brav
> wrote:
>
ill get exactly the same Sage environment in
> Jupyter as you get at Sage's prompt.
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:10 Chris Brav
> wrote:
>
>> I like to use a jupyter notebook for sage, but also want to use a bit of
>> macaulay2 at the same, using the sage interface
I like to use a jupyter notebook for sage, but also want to use a bit of
macaulay2 at the same, using the sage interface. In a sage terminal,
macaulay2('2+2')
returns 4 as expected, but in a jupyter notebook I get an error, the end of
which reads
TypeError: unable to start macaulay2 because t
arccos(cos(t)) <2*pi) With these assumptions, the integrate command
produced "Is 1 zero or nonzero?" I wish I could find simpler example for
which produces this error message, but I really have no idea what's
happening here. Best wishes, Chris PS By the way, Sage is outputting
Appears to be a bug that comes when integrating expression.
Maxima asks "Is 1 zero or nonzero?" and then suggests using assume(1>0).
Then it fails to accept this assumption...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe fr
How make show("some text") be LEFT ALIGNED instead of CENTERED?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To pos
How combine text (with and without Latex) and equations when printing?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
This outputs some text.
show(table(["test"]))
How change the background color?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@goog
In SageCell this shows each element with a nice light blue background and a
TINY amount of space between them
show(table(["A", "B", "C"]))
How remove that space so that all the light blue backgrounds go together
and appear all as one piece?
Chris
--
You rec
which checks.
>
> Again, sorry for the noise...
>
> --
> Emmanuel Charpentier
>
>
> Le dimanche 16 juillet 2017 18:29:46 UTC+2, Chris Seberino a écrit :
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Thank you for your reply but you solved a DIFFERENT equation. Notice
>>
Emmanuel
Thank you for your reply but you solved a DIFFERENT equation. Notice mine
has an x variable in it.
I can get your's to work but not mine.
cs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop r
This does not solve...
var("y C")
solve( log(y) == C + log(x) + log(y-1),y)
It returns
[log(y) == C + log(x) + log(y - 1)]
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe
I've tried lots of variations of the following to replace a product of
functions with y. They all give the error at the bottom in Sagecell. How
fix?
var("y")
f = function("f")(x)
g = function("g")(x)
eqtn = f(x) * g(x) + 4*f(x)^2 * g(x) == 0
eqtn = eqtn.substitute({f(x) * g(x) : y})
show(eqtn)
I know how to set the term order in Sage. But this is a somewhat different
issue, and maybe I am not explaining it well. What I mean is that I create a
matrix A over S with respect to a basis e_1,...,e_n in Sage and then pass it to
Singular, where I compute the symmetric power. But when it compu
Given a Sage matrix A over a polynomial ring S.=QQ[] , I can make it into a
Singular matrix via A._singular_(). Call the result AA. I can then do various
operations on AA, for example symmetricPower(AA,d).
In this case, the default order for the basis of the symmetric power seems to
be 'dp', but
Caution to those who want to use this: Singular produces a symmetric power
matrix in a basis that is the reverse of what you (or at least I) might expect.
Which basis Singular chooses is clear if you test it on a diagonal matrix with
variables as entries.
--
You received this message because
Thanks. It seems that indeed some rings, such as ZZ and QQ, are too exotic for
Singular, and that you really have to base change to a polynomial ring over a
field. Here is a little function definition which seems to work for any matrix
defined over a domain:
def sympow(A,d):
R=A.base_ring()
I'd like to be able to compute symmetric powers of matrices in Sage. Singular
has a function for the kth symmetric power of a matrix A, namely
symmetricPower(A,k)
(https://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/4-0-3/sing_1107.htm#SEC1182). So it
seems one should just take a Sage matrix, convert it to a
Saturday, April 8, 2017 at 3:21:17 PM UTC-5, saad khalid wrote:
>
> I am a student and I definitely agree with Chris Seberino here. I don't
> think it is the job of software (or, rather, it is not good CAS design) to
> try and teach people mathematics in this way. I think that the CA
I have no doubt you know about group theory and math in general more than
me. I have no doubt
your answer is defensible and accurate.
What I'm concerned about is the young students and what they expect to see
when
they type factor( ... ).
cs
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:56:31 AM UTC-5, pro
in the symbolic ring 3*(2*x+1) is immediately expanded again. Try
> yourself:
>
> sage: 2*(1+3*x)
> 6*x + 2
>
> But see also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21067
>
> Regards,
>
> On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 5:47:28 PM UTC+2, Chris Seberino wrote:
>>
>> Why fac
No
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Why factor(6*x+3) doesn't give 3*(2*x+1) ?
Thanks!
cs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to thi
> you will be able to use the very powerful tools specifically for
> polynomials, rather than the symbolic ring.
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 5:55:48 PM UTC, Chris Seberino wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to get Sage to do simplification of algebra equations.
I'm trying to get Sage to do simplification of algebra equations. After I
expand some polynomial products I see identical terms on both
sides of the equation.
How make Sage eliminate those? the simplify and full_simplify don't seem
to do it.
--
You received this message because you are su
Shouldn't the 2 lines below work in SageCell? It gives an error because
the implicit multiplication isn't set. Why?
implicit_multiplication(10)
4 5
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei
them):
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21046 . Once this is in, I will change the
normalisation to used these numerical symbols to get the right scaling
factor also for the other two implementations. Then this warning will
disappear.
Chris
On Wednesday, 9 November 2016 00:25:33 UTC, francisco
above is really just an example of
the problem.
Does anyone know what in particular is causing the sum to fail?
Much appreciated!
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop rec
I am not getting any output with the following integral. No errors — just no
answer:
b=var('b') ; assume(b > 0) ; integrate(1/(x^2+b^2),x,-oo,oo)
Am I doing anything wrong?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
py,pz,w',domain='real')
The above example works with no problem.
Long story short, the problem is solved, and I need to be more explicit
when I create variables because sage can treat them more generally than I
may intend.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
C
On Sunday, June 7, 2015 a
Greetings,
I've encountered a problem which I can't at the moment solve. Hopefully
the solution is either known or obvious to someone on this forum, but I
would appreciate any constructive input.
When I try to make a graph with the following:
p1=plot(delta.substitute(px=5,py=0,pz=1,R=1,h=10,w=
On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:48:07 AM UTC-6, Jakob Kroeker wrote:
>
>
> Even if it is expectable that in some cases (which?) solve may not return
> all solutions, it should be explicitly pointed out;
> Especially it should be stated that an empty list does not necessarily
> imply there are
Emmanuel
Any way to make Sage act like it can't find the solution (emit question
back to user) INSTEAD of emitting the empty set?
"I can't find the solution" and "There is no solution" are NOT the same
thing?
> cs
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
I didn't *need* to have 0.04. This is just a command that actually came up
in real work.
I didn't want to alter it in any way lest it may be a genuine bug.
cs
On Monday, November 17, 2014 6:48:04 AM UTC-6, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> Why 0.04 ? Th notebook says :
>
> S=(5^( x -1) == (0.04)^
If you ask Sage to do something it can't, like solve a quintic polynomial
equation, it will spit the question back at you.
If Sage did that I'd be fine. However, Sage spit back the empty set which
is the WRONG answer and far different yes?
On Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:54:20 PM UTC-6, RRoge
command in subject line should return 1/5 not empty set right??? What gives?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegrou
issing something?
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
The binary seems to be running fine for now.
Chris
On Oct 21, 2014 12:11 PM, "Volker Braun" wrote:
> Sage doesn't compile on OSX 10.10 at the moment. See the sage-devel
> thread.
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 6:56:27 PM UTC+1, Chris Maness wrote:
&g
Has anyone tried the 6.3 binary with Sage?
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
ue.
> 3) In theory I think "sage -upgrade" still works...
>
It worked for 6.2.
>
>
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
What port does the Sage upgrade use so that IT can add a firewall rule for
me to upgrade Sage?
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
}{ \partial y }
\dot { y } $$
I can't reproduce Mathematica's strange output here, but it is the correct
definition of the total derivative.
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from
)
Thanks again for your help.
On Sunday, September 7, 2014 5:25:31 PM UTC-5, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 7, 2014 10:28:02 AM UTC-7, Chris Thron wrote:
>>
>> (1) I have expressions like curl*H - c^(-1)*d_t*D, where curl and d_t
>> express derivatives.
HI,
I'm trying to write a program that converts electromagnetic equations from
CGS to MKS units. I've run into the following issues:
(1) I have expressions like curl*H - c^(-1)*d_t*D, where curl and d_t
express derivatives. In the process of conversion, sage switches the order
and outputs:
H
te than others so I need a way to cull bad values.
2. I'd like to pass in t, h, k, r and get the possible values for d (there
can be two, if I'm not mistaken)
Can anyone point me at the functions that I can use to solve these
equations or have any suggestions for the solutions? I apprec
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:23 PM, wrote:
>
> On Saturday, August 23, 2014 6:28:33 PM UTC-5, Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>> I am thinking I am not a big fan of using the sage -upgrade command since
>> it downloads all the source and recompiles the whole thing from source. Is
I am thinking I am not a big fan of using the sage -upgrade command since
it downloads all the source and recompiles the whole thing from source. Is
there a clean way to upgrade using binaries?
Regards,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Is it possible with sage to use some type of shorthand notation to
denote the first or second time derivative?
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro
I would like to take the derivative of a function defined as as such that:
f(x,z)=(2*x+2*z*(dz/dx))/sqrt(x^2+a^2+z^2) and z=z(x) (z is an
unknown function of x). I am working on Euler-Legrange stuff.
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I am a bit new to Sage, what method would you recommend for finding
the solutions numerically?
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 3:49:06 PM UTC-7, Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>> But I am getting some strange results. Onl
t does not
match the graph.
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send e
I got it. I see that I am not supposed to but limits in the plot
function. The limits of the piecewise function provide that
information.
This works:
f1=x*e^x;
f2=x*e^(-x);
f=Piecewise([[(-5,0),f1],[(0,5),f2]]);
f.plot()
Chris
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Chris Maness wrote:
> I am
I am not certain why this does not work:
f1=x*e^(-x);
f2=x*e^x;
f=Piecewise([[(0,5),f1],[(0,-5),f2]]);
plot(f,x,-5,5)
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
;
t=var('t');
assume(t > 0);
integrate(exp(-k^2/(4*a))*exp(i*k*x-i*hbar*k^2*t/(2*m)),k,-oo,oo)
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
A, that is the issue.
Thanks
Chris
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 4:33:33 PM UTC-7, Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>>
>> TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '*': 'Symbolic Ring' and
>>
I don't see what the issue is with the code below:
phinS=e^(i*n*pi*x/a);
phim=e^(-i*m*pi*x/a);
a=var('a');
assume(a > 0);
n=1;
m=1;
integrate(phinS*phim,x,-a,a)
I get this undecipherable error:
Traceback (most recent call last):integrate(phinS*phim,x,-a,a)
File "", line 1, in
File
"/p
Is there a way to only add the odd integers of a sum in Sage?
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@google
That looks correct. Sure wish I could do that :D
Chris
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:50 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:39:30 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:51:18 PM UTC+8, kcrisman wrote:
>>>
>>
Can one define a differential operator like the Hamiltonian energy operator
separately in sage, or does it always have to already be acting and a
function before you make the definition?
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-su
I am running 6.2 on OSX Mavericks (10.9)
Christophers-MacBook-Pro:sage chris$ ./sage -v
Sage Version 6.2, Release Date: 2014-05-06
Chris
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:51 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>> You, saw a plot? I didn't see a plot.
>>
>
>
> Hmm. Can you say m
You, saw a plot? I didn't see a plot.
Chris
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:52 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, June 23, 2014 9:18:29 PM UTC-4, Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to plot a superposition of two static states psi1 and psi2
>> that compose a state
P.expand();
plot(P(x,1,1),x,0,1)
I get the following error message:
verbose 0 (2415: plot.py, generate_plot_points) WARNING: When plotting,
failed to evaluate function at 200 points.
verbose 0 (2415: plot.py, generate_plot_points) Last error message:
'Unable to solve by radica
Thank you. I am able to do simple examples, but I am having problems
plotting my function without the sliders, so I am going to post that
too.
Chris
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:51 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>> I would like to plot my wave function probability P vs. x, but it
>>
I would like to plot my wave function probability P vs. x, but it
would be cool if I could have a time slider that shows how the plot
changes parametrically.
Anyone know how to this easily?
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Thank you.
Chris
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:47 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
> sage: bool(x.conjugate() == x)
> False
> sage: assume(x, 'real')
> sage: bool(x.conjugate() == x)
> True
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, June 14, 2014 6:12:06 AM UTC+8, Chris Maness wrote:
&
Is there a way that I can define my variables to be real, so that when I
take square the modulus, I don't get variables with bars over them when
they are assumed real.
Thanks,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support&
I would not be surprised it it was the finite field arithmetic that is
causing the difference.
On Friday, February 28, 2014 4:18:44 PM UTC-5, Aleksandr Kodess wrote:
>
> As far as I know both sage and magma utilize Brendan McKay's program nauty
> in order to check whether two given graphs (direc
> but Sage says " name 'ans' is not defined".
>
That looks like a bug that - I believe - was fixed in 6.1. So maybe you
should upgrade to the newest version. However in 6.1 this also yields an
error, the one explained by David.
Chris.
--
You received th
I've been searching the Internet and can't find examples of plots of
functions of THREE
variables like f(x, y, z).
I'd like to use a different color at each point in space to denote the
function value.
Is that possible in Sage? Are there examples somewhere?
(All the examples I saw were for 2
ted here (since E has complex multiplication). These
computations prove that the 13-torsion part of Sha is trivial.
Chris.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
No - because sqrt is multivalued, the answer can be, and in this case is,
> multivalued: sometimes true and sometimes false. This isn't desperately
> helpful, or course, and can be cast in other ways in terms of the defect
>
> If a boolean is "sometimes true and sometimes false" it is false and
> Because square root is multivalued.
Even so, I would consider this to be wrong for
a) I don't want my students to think it is true and
b) the left hand side is two-valued while the right hand
side is four-valued and hence they do not agree as
multi-valued functions. (This objec
On Friday, July 12, 2013 5:01:11 PM UTC-5, William wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Chris Seberino
> >
> wrote:
> > bug found in solve function? solve( x * (x + 2) == 143, x) returns [x
> ==
> > 11, x == -13]
> >
> > See here...new S
bug found in solve function? solve( x * (x + 2) == 143, x) returns [x ==
11, x == -13]
See here...new Sage session...
% sage
--
| Sage Version 5.2, Release Date: 2012-07-25 |
| Type "notebook()" for the
Oh wow that is soo awesome. Someone read my mind.
I've been selling Sage to my students with a slightly inadequate server but
Sage Cell Server will dispense with the need for passwords,
memory issues and more.
Their impressions of Sage are about to go up tenfold.
A thousand thank yous.
x27;m envisioning something like wolframalpha.com where a teacher can ask all
students to type
single commands at a time without the need for saving history.
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from
sage: k4=graphs.CompleteGraph(4)
sage: k4.complement().line_graph().complement()
complement(): Graph on 0 vertices
clique_number() is crashing on the empty graph,
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 9:30:27 AM UTC-5, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
> for g in graphs(4):
> g.complement().line_graph().comple
On Monday, September 24, 2012 9:36:36 PM UTC-5, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
>
> What has been observed however is that not all worksheets get closed
> and there are often many worksheets that remain open in the background.
> From a performance point of view, all that these worksheets do is eat
>
you need for 10 people
to be able to hit the server all at the same time comfortably?
cs
On Monday, September 24, 2012 8:31:16 PM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 24, 2012 8:32:23 PM UTC-4, Chris Seberino wrote:
>>
>> Notebook server very slow. What ar
Students leave their notebooks open so server has a TON of notebooks
openis that a problem?
(I'm thinking about performance mainly.)
cs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@goog
Notebook server very slow. What are typical bottlenecks? I have ver5.2 and
1Gb RAM
cs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send ema
I logged into Sage as admin and noticed there were a ton of open
worksheets.
(I have a lot of users.)
I can't delete active worksheets. If I selected one or more and press the
"Delete" button, nothing happens?
cs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
SOLVED...
I have 64 bit hardware but I installed 32 bit Ubuntu. (Sorry, I'm a newbie
to 64 bit stuff and didn't even know there was a separate Ubuntu flavor.)
When I installed the 32bit Sage binary it worked.
One suggestion is to perhaps add a check to see if user trying to run the
64 bit b
On new 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04, I tried compiling from source and got this
error...
(I know predefs.h exists because I can see the file here:
/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/bits/predefs.h .)
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:28:0,
from ../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:87
> That's odd, it doesn't even give a location where the ")" was
> unexpectedly found. Was there any more output than that?
>
>
No that was it verbatim. This is a 64 bit machine. That is the only thing
different I can see from what I've used before.
(This is an HP computer.)
cs
--
You rec
I just installed Ubuntu 12.04 and tried to install Sage ver5.2
When I try to run Sage for the first time I get this...
% sage
--
| Sage Version 5.2, Release Date: 2012-07-25 |
| Type "notebook()" for the b
>
> Great! Did you base your previous, wrong Apache config on some material
> from the Sage website / wiki / etc.? If so, can you tell us where it is,
> so we can fix it?
>
>
> I don't think this bug was from a Sage page.
If I see it in some docs I'll let you know however.
cs
--
You rece
SOLVED!
I'm posting this in case it helps anyone else out there trying to use Sage
with Apache.
The problem with an Apache config issue. The line below is wrong...
> Redirect / https://sage.phil4.com
>
>
It should be this:
Redirect / https://sage.phil4.com/
(Notice the / at the end now.)
I've been successfully proxying older versions of Sage behind Apache2 using
SSL.
The same script doesn't work with Sage 5.2 for some reason.
Here is my Apache code below (Code below redirects all to HTTPS.)
The new problem is that when I try to log in as adminSage tries to go to
https://sage
Robert,
Thanks a lot. I'll submit a bug report on the maxima bug tracker.
Chris
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On 2012-06-26, Chris Kees wrote:
>
>> The following bit of code correctly computes the triple integral
>> (64\pi/3) for the volume of
qrt(4 - x**2))
show(i2)
i3 = 8*integral(i2,x,0,2,algorithm='sympy')
show(i3)
If I don't use sympy on the last integral it fails with the following
error message. Anybody know how to give maxima enough information to
solve the problem? -Chris
Traceback (most recent call last):sho
On Monday, June 18, 2012 4:16:50 PM UTC-5, Oleksandr Kazymyrov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I haven't the problem on Ubuntu 12.04:
>
> Oleksandr
I fixed the problem. Today when I tried vector I got a DIFFERENT error
message about a Fortran library missing. When I manually installed
glibfortran3 it sta
I installed Ubuntu 12.04 about 2 weeks ago along with Sage 5.
I just now tried using vectors for the first time and got this error...
sage: vector( [-1,2] )
---
AttributeErrorTraceback (most recent
s of one of the aforementioned files)? Are
there any conventions I should consider about what I put in __init__.py and
all.py?
Thanks,
Chris
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
ce.
>
In a quick experiment the notebook behaved as I would expect, so I think
this is a great solution.
Best,
Chris
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
We'd like to move the notebook to that.
>
Both of these are much more appealing options for editing an individual
cell. I was not aware of them.
Thanks,
Chris
>
> Jason
>
>
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe f
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
