Re: [sage-support] Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse?

2016-03-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I recall a reference of this that even allows parameters in the matrix: https://zbmath.org/1097.15006 On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 6:13:30 PM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-03-24 18:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 03/24/2016 10:44 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > >> Does anybody know of

[sage-support] Re: Computing orbits of different actions (through gap)

2016-03-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 2:20:56 PM UTC, Jernej wrote: > > Thanks. I wasn't aware that passing the group to libgap will actually try > to pass all of its elements to gap! > It does not pass all of its elements, certainly. It passes the generators, as a string, and this string is too long

Re: [sage-support] Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse?

2016-03-24 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-03-24 18:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 03/24/2016 10:44 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Does anybody know of an implementation of the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse (a generalised inverse for matrices) in Sage? I couldn't find anything, but just in case I RTFM badly or it's known under some diff

Re: [sage-support] Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse?

2016-03-24 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/24/2016 10:44 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Does anybody know of an implementation of the Moore–Penrose > pseudoinverse (a generalised inverse for matrices) in Sage? I couldn't > find anything, but just in case I RTFM badly or it's known under some > different name, I ask here. > I looked

Re: [sage-support] Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse?

2016-03-24 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-03-24 15:58, William Stein wrote: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.10.0/reference/generated/numpy.linalg.pinv.html Numpy works fine for RR or CC but not so much for other fields. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To uns

Re: [sage-support] Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse?

2016-03-24 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Does anybody know of an implementation of the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse (a > generalised inverse for matrices) in Sage? I couldn't find anything, but > just in case I RTFM badly or it's known under some different name, I ask > here. Googl

[sage-support] Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse?

2016-03-24 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Does anybody know of an implementation of the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse (a generalised inverse for matrices) in Sage? I couldn't find anything, but just in case I RTFM badly or it's known under some different name, I ask here. Jeroen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[sage-support] Re: Computing orbits of different actions (through gap)

2016-03-24 Thread Jernej
Thanks. I wasn't aware that passing the group to libgap will actually try to pass all of its elements to gap! Continuing on the topic though I have two new questions about this libgap magic. When doing g.Orbits(tuples([1..7],2),libgap.OnTuples) are the tuples actually computed in Sage and passe

[sage-support] Re: Computing orbits of different actions (through gap)

2016-03-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 6:36:55 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 11:10:42 PM UTC, Jernej wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> Thanks! I wasn't aware of libgap! One more followup question. Say I want >> to compute the orbits of the CubeGraph of order 10. The descr