I recall a reference of this that even allows parameters in the matrix: https://zbmath.org/1097.15006
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 6:13:30 PM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-03-24 18:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 03/24/2016 10:44 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > >> Does anybody know of an implementation of the Moore–Penrose > >> pseudoinverse (a generalised inverse for matrices) in Sage? I couldn't > >> find anything, but just in case I RTFM badly or it's known under some > >> different name, I ask here. > >> > > > > I looked once but didn't find anything. We're missing the SVD for rings > > like RR, or it would be easy to fix. > > I want the pseudo-inverse over any base field. There is no reason to > restrict to RR. The SVD on the other hand is not defined over any field. > > Anyway, I need the pseudo-inverse, so I'll have to implement it myself. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
