[sage-support] Question about ortogonal subspaces

2014-07-15 Thread Juan Grados
Dears members, I trying to solve the next problem. Let be the chain of subspaces J1 \subset J2 \subset J3 \subset J4 over the finite field GF(3), where dim(J1) = 2, dim(J2) = 4, dim(J3) = 6 and dim(J4)=8. I want extract the basis vector of the subspace J4-J3, J3-J2 and J2-J1. For J4-J3 I get using

[sage-support] Re: building from source: setuptools says "Function not implemented"

2014-07-15 Thread Volker Braun
PPS: Which file system is this on? It might be flock() failing if your cluster fs doesn't support locking. In that case, does building on a local disk work? On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:17:13 PM UTC-4, j.d.c...@sheffield.ac.uk wrote: > > I am attempting to build SAGE 6.2 from source on a cluster

[sage-support] Re: building from source: setuptools says "Function not implemented"

2014-07-15 Thread Volker Braun
The latest beta upgraded setuptools to 3.6, this might fix it. On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:03:28 PM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > I vaguely remember seeing that before, but not sure where. If you run > "make" again does it fail consistently? > > > On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:17:13 PM UTC-4, j.

[sage-support] Re: building from source: setuptools says "Function not implemented"

2014-07-15 Thread Volker Braun
I vaguely remember seeing that before, but not sure where. If you run "make" again does it fail consistently? On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:17:13 PM UTC-4, j.d.c...@sheffield.ac.uk wrote: > > I am attempting to build SAGE 6.2 from source on a cluster running > Scientific Linux (a Red Hat derivati

[sage-support] building from source: setuptools says "Function not implemented"

2014-07-15 Thread j . d . cranch
I am attempting to build SAGE 6.2 from source on a cluster running Scientific Linux (a Red Hat derivative; kernel 2.6.32-431.1.2.el6.x86_64). The CPU was (I'm fairly sure) an AMD Opteron 2218 HE. My build effort failed while trying to build setuptools, giving a somewhat taciturn error message

[sage-support] Re: Got sagenb running, need help

2014-07-15 Thread Nils Bruin
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:28:35 AM UTC-7, Jole Bradbury wrote: > > I can't. I've tried compiling sagecell using the instructions posted > online and have gotten countless errors. It appears that it is because I am > running 10.9 not 10.6, but I cannot revert back to 10.6. > OSX 10.9 I presume

[sage-support] Re: Got sagenb running, need help

2014-07-15 Thread Jole Bradbury
I can't. I've tried compiling sagecell using the instructions posted online and have gotten countless errors. It appears that it is because I am running 10.9 not 10.6, but I cannot revert back to 10.6. On Monday, July 14, 2014 5:54:54 PM UTC-4, P Purkayastha wrote: > > You should look at sagecel

Re: [sage-support] GIT repository and installation

2014-07-15 Thread Robert Bradshaw
The very short answer is to type "make" and wait an hour or three. On Jul 14, 2014 4:54 AM, "Oscar Alberto Castillo Felisola" < o.castillo.felis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Checking it out! Thank you John. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-suppor

Re: [sage-support] SAGE in windows

2014-07-15 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hi Liliana, Yes and no. It is possible but it does not work out of the box. You need to use cygwin and the potential list of problems are gathered on these webpages: - http://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/CygwinPort - http://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/Cygwin64Port good luck Vincent 2014-07-15 11:59 UTC+0

[sage-support] SAGE in windows

2014-07-15 Thread Liliana Ironi
Is it possible to install SAGE in Windows but not in an emulating mode ? Thanks Liliana Ironi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsu

[sage-support] SAGE in the RedHat6 environment.

2014-07-15 Thread Liliana Ironi
It seems that it is not possible to use SAGE in the RedHat6 environment because the GCV2 package distributed by RedHat is not in agreement with what requested by SAGE. Does anybody know what we should do ? Thanks, Liliana Ironi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go