[sage-support] I need some sage 5.11 advice: RE: chrome is locked on fullscreen (Virtuabox+win8)

2013-10-16 Thread Joshua Donnelly
I got the latest sage VM for windows 5.11 or whatever but when i start it up... 1. Chrome is locked on Fullscreen how do I break out of that? and once i get to a terminal... 2. How do I establish ssh to your vbox username:sage? pasword:sage? machine address:?? (or how to find) (ifconfig eth0 st

Re: [sage-support] Why E.sha().an() = 0 and E.sha().an_numerical() = 1.0 ?

2013-10-16 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
This is now See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15299 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

Re: [sage-support] Why E.sha().an() = 0 and E.sha().an_numerical() = 1.0 ?

2013-10-16 Thread Georgi Guninski
As a workaround you probably can use analytic rank E.analytic_rank(leading_coefficient=1) (5, 3634.28250646374195) The second number is the value of first non-vanishing derivative. If you need more precision, you can set the precision in pari/gp and do: gp.ellanalyticrank(gp(E)) -- it returns the

Re: [sage-support] Why E.sha().an() = 0 and E.sha().an_numerical() = 1.0 ?

2013-10-16 Thread John Cremona
On 16 October 2013 13:54, Georgi Guninski wrote: > After debugging this I saw the problem. > In sha_tate.py:410 > you consider the first derivative non-zero and use it > in computations, while in practice it is zero > (e-15 vs error_bound=e-25). This looks like a bug to me. Even with more work:

[sage-support] Re: No picture displayed in SageCell

2013-10-16 Thread chu-ching huang
Thanks for reply and wait for the patch to re-install SageCell. Thanks again cch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@goog

[sage-support] Re: No picture displayed in SageCell

2013-10-16 Thread chu-ching huang
chu-ching huang於 2013年10月16日星期三UTC上午11時30分40秒寫道: > > Hi All, > > Following the installing guide of Sagecell site, I tried to install > SageCell from Sage-5.12 source in Linux box. Almost operations can work on > Sagecell; but while input the following simple code to plot, no result > displayed

Re: [sage-support] Why E.sha().an() = 0 and E.sha().an_numerical() = 1.0 ?

2013-10-16 Thread Georgi Guninski
After debugging this I saw the problem. In sha_tate.py:410 you consider the first derivative non-zero and use it in computations, while in practice it is zero (e-15 vs error_bound=e-25). On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:56:27AM +0100, John Cremona wrote: > We have theory that tells us that for curves of

[sage-support] Re: No picture displayed in SageCell

2013-10-16 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/16/13 6:30 AM, chu-ching huang wrote: Following the installing guide of Sagecell site, I tried to install The installation guide may be out of date. I'm glad to hear that something worked, it seems. SageCell from Sage-5.12 source in Linux box. I haven't upgraded our patches to Sag

[sage-support] No picture displayed in SageCell

2013-10-16 Thread chu-ching huang
Hi All, Following the installing guide of Sagecell site, I tried to install SageCell from Sage-5.12 source in Linux box. Almost operations can work on Sagecell; but while input the following simple code to plot, no result displayed: plot(sin(x),x) And no error occurred. Do I modify the setti

Re: [sage-support] Why E.sha().an() = 0 and E.sha().an_numerical() = 1.0 ?

2013-10-16 Thread John Cremona
We have theory that tells us that for curves of analytic rank 0 or 1, Sha is finite and while BSD is not completely proved for such curves, the formula it claims for #Sha is certainly rational -- and Sage does compute this exactly. But for analytic rank >1 the "analytic Sha" is just the value pred

[sage-support] Why E.sha().an() = 0 and E.sha().an_numerical() = 1.0 ?

2013-10-16 Thread Georgi Guninski
Why E.sha().an() = 0 and E.sha().an_numerical() = 1.0 ? On 5.11 on linux and on cloud.sagemath.com: sage: E=EllipticCurve(QQ,[0, 0, 1, -79, 342]);E.sha().an(),E.sha().an_numerical() (0, 1.00) #^ why different and 0 is integer ? sage: E.sha().bound() (0, 0) sage: type(E.sha().an())