On Friday, 24 May 2013 13:36:08 UTC+8, jcjorgec...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, May 24, 2013 1:26:52 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 24 May 2013 07:47:40 UTC+8, jcjorgec...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I just installed Sage 5.9 on a computer running Windows (VirtualBox).
On Friday, May 24, 2013 1:26:52 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, 24 May 2013 07:47:40 UTC+8, jcjorgec...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I just installed Sage 5.9 on a computer running Windows (VirtualBox). But
>> could not make it run with Texmaker.
>>
>> I'm trying to run the "Example
On Friday, 24 May 2013 07:47:40 UTC+8, jcjorgec...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I just installed Sage 5.9 on a computer running Windows (VirtualBox). But
> could not make it run with Texmaker.
>
> I'm trying to run the "Examples of embedding Sage in LaTeX...", so I
> presume that the LaTeX code is corr
I just installed Sage 5.9 on a computer running Windows (VirtualBox). But could
not make it run with Texmaker.
I'm trying to run the "Examples of embedding Sage in LaTeX...", so I presume
that the LaTeX code is correct. The problem must be in the communication
between Texmaker and Sage operatin
I kind of assumed that this was numerical, thanks!
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:40:06 PM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> You are using a symbolic solver for a rather large system of equations.
> Maybe it's not really possible to solve this in a sane way and therefore
> you don't get an
Hi
You are using a symbolic solver for a rather large system of equations.
Maybe it's not really possible to solve this in a sane way and therefore
you don't get an answer. I suggest you to look into solving this
numerically, especially because in the end you seem to be only interested
in a nu
