On 11/14/2012 06:54 AM, David Harvey wrote:
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.8, Release Date: 2012-01-20'
sage: L = [-4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
On 11/14/2012 11:38 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
I would be in favor of delegating Itanium to a second class platform. As
less and less people have access to it its bound to become more
troublesome. Of course there is value in having it working eventually,
but it doesn't have to be on the first day.
This works on sagenb.org too.
Integer > mpmath.mpf returns True
while
Integer - mpmath.mpf is negative
sage: import mpmath
sage: mpmath.mp.pretty=True
sage: n=100
sage: a,b=prime_pi(n),mpmath.li(n)
sage: (a,b,type(a),type(b))
(25, 30.1261415840796, , )
sage: (a < b, a == b, a > b)
(False, Fals
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:21 AM, wrote:
> Today's Topic Summary
>
> Group: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/topics
>
>- SEGV in libatlas.so <#13afaca697df5861_group_thread_0> [3 Updates]
>- how the arithmetic modulo are programming in
> sage<#13afaca697df5861_group_thread_1
Hi John,
I'm guessing whatever launcher problem you have will go away
once you've rebooted.
Regards,
Jan
On 14 November 2012 07:19, JJS137 wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> I ran the second command but it did not find anything to do. The Launcher
> had some issue because the first command actually started S
Hi Jan,
I ran the second command but it did not find anything to do. The Launcher
had some issue because the first command actually started Sage in my
browser (Firefox). That instance worked fine. The launcher still has a
problem, but the sign in page is presented when using the standard URL.
Ma
Hi John,
Great. Did you need ONLY the first command? Is Sage starting
and running OK? Is your launcher icon working?
The postinst script of the debian/ubuntu package runs configure:
echo "Removing previous path, rm -rf /usr/lib/sage (new path
/usr/lib/sagemath)"
rm -rf /usr/lib/s
Hi Jan,
It worked like a charm!
jjs@jjs-laptop:~$ sudo dpkg --configure sagemath-upstream-binary
[sudo] password for jjs:
Setting up sagemath-upstream-binary (5.4) ...
Removing previous path, rm -rf /usr/lib/sage (new path /usr/lib/sagemath)
Running Sage once as root to set paths
Hi John,
On 14 November 2012 01:01, JJS137 wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> Thanks for the prompt response. The output to your command was:
>
> jjs@jjs-laptop:~$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure sagemath-upstream-binary
> [sudo] password for jjs:
> /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: sagemath-upstream-binary is broken or not
>
I would be in favor of delegating Itanium to a second class platform. As
less and less people have access to it its bound to become more
troublesome. Of course there is value in having it working eventually, but
it doesn't have to be on the first day.
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:09:08 PM
On 2012-11-13, Volker Braun wrote:
> --=_Part_133_37800.1352827000551
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Apparently it won't. Itanium doesn't work correctly and it doesn't look
> like Clint (=Upstream) will have time anytime soon to look into it. If I
> were him I'd think twi
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the prompt response. The output to your command was:
jjs@jjs-laptop:~$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure sagemath-upstream-binary
[sudo] password for jjs:
/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: sagemath-upstream-binary is broken or not fully
installed
jjs@jjs-laptop:~$
Cheers,
John
On Wednesday,
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.8, Release Date: 2012-01-20'
sage: L = [-4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, -4
Hi John,
Thanks for the report. I have not seen this error before, but 5.4 is only
out for a day or two in the Ubuntu PPA now.
Would you mind running this command and sending the output back here?
sudo dpkg-reconfigure sagemath-upstream-binary
I'd like to see whether a terminal produces the sam
Apparently it won't. Itanium doesn't work correctly and it doesn't look
like Clint (=Upstream) will have time anytime soon to look into it. If I
were him I'd think twice about prioritizing effort for a dead platform,
too.
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:32:00 AM UTC-5, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
On Monday, October 15, 2012 10:27:41 PM UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> another issue here is that the Atlas version used in 5.3 is old and
> obsolete.
> The new one is here:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10508
>
>
I hope it gets in soon. 5.10 is so much better. Compiled here
16 matches
Mail list logo
