On 2012-11-13, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > ------=_Part_133_37800.1352827000551 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Apparently it won't. Itanium doesn't work correctly and it doesn't look > like Clint (=Upstream) will have time anytime soon to look into it. If I > were him I'd think twice about prioritizing effort for a dead platform, > too. This does look very unfortunate that we have to be held back by this. Should we just ship sage on itanium with an older atlas?
Dima > > > > On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:32:00 AM UTC-5, P Purkayastha wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, October 15, 2012 10:27:41 PM UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> another issue here is that the Atlas version used in 5.3 is old and >>> obsolete. >>> The new one is here: >>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10508 >>> >>> >> I hope it gets in soon. 5.10 is so much better. Compiled here in 30m, >> while the previous one would go on and on for hours and then eventually >> fail. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
