Re: [sage-support] Bad Gateway

2010-08-09 Thread Mitesh Patel
On 08/08/2010 05:43 AM, Rolandb wrote: > I used dowload all, and thereafter I tried to upload the file > download_worksheets. The following message appears: > > Bad Gateway > > The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. > Apache/2.2.12 (Ubuntu) Server at 192.168.231.12

[sage-support] Re: Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Nils Bruin
Have you checked if your processors are actually running at the full 2.00 GHz? Most linux distributions throttle the CPU to conserve power nowadays, using an "on demand" policy. I have seen less than perfect adjusting of the CPU speed under low load. Try fixing your CPU speed to maximum and see if

[sage-support] Memleak: could this be solved please?

2010-08-09 Thread Rolandb
Hi, Memory leaks are annoying. For instance #9298. Could somebody have a look at it? Thanks in advance! Roland -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit t

Re: [sage-support] Re: Boolean operators... Implication ?

2010-08-09 Thread Nathann Cohen
> Yes, one could create an infix operator, but I think the above is much > more clear than having to learn yet more notation. > > Explicit is better than implicit. > Simple is better than complex. Indeed, but I often use the trick sum( some_list_of_booleans ) to count the number of "True". I was a

Re: [sage-support] regarding arrayobject.h

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Rajeev wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to work out the first example given in > > http://wiki.cython.org/WrappingNumpy > > in sage notebook, but got an error saying > > arrayobject.h not found. How do I get this example working? I've fixed that page so it should work

[sage-support] Re: Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Istarion
Sage 4.3 exhibits the same slowness issue in Ubuntu. On Aug 9, 3:50 pm, Istarion wrote: > Ah, it appears I misunderstood. I had run that command while my > computer was relatively inactive. Running it after my program ran for > around 4 minutes yields this result: 1.83 1.19 0.53 2/255 1682 > > I

Re: [sage-support] Re: Boolean operators... Implication ?

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote: >> This can of course be written "(not g.is_forest() and g.has_even_cycle())" > > Ok, ok, I know... Let's make it "g.is_forest() or g.has_even_cycle()" Yes, one could create an infix operator, but I think the above is much more clear than havin

[sage-support] Re: Boolean operators... Implication ?

2010-08-09 Thread Nathann Cohen
> This can of course be written "(not g.is_forest() and g.has_even_cycle())" Ok, ok, I know... Let's make it "g.is_forest() or g.has_even_cycle()" ^^; Nathann -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubs

[sage-support] Boolean operators... Implication ?

2010-08-09 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello Everybody !! I just had to write a doctest saying "If this bipartite graph is not a forest, then is has an even cycle" This can of course be written "(not g.is_forest() and g.has_even_cycle())" I would have like to have some "implication operator", to be able to write : ( not g.is_forest(

[sage-support] P!=NP Proof?

2010-08-09 Thread Ben Edwards
Just because it might be interest to all the mathematicians out there, there is an interesting proof out there that is being taken at least a little seriously showing P!=NP http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/a-proof-that-p-is-not-equal-to-np/ -- To post to this group, send email to sage-su

[sage-support] Re: Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Istarion
Ah, it appears I misunderstood. I had run that command while my computer was relatively inactive. Running it after my program ran for around 4 minutes yields this result: 1.83 1.19 0.53 2/255 1682 I will try downloading Sage 4.3, and see if that fixes the problem. On Aug 9, 3:33 pm, Harald Schill

[sage-support] Re: Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Harald Schilly
On Aug 9, 9:25 pm, Istarion wrote: > I am running Sage 4.5 in Ubuntu and Sage 4.3 in VirtualBox. When I > checked the relative speed of the program in Ubuntu, I ran it right > after booting up, with the only other active process being System > Monitor. > > $ cat /proc/loadavg yields: 0.68 0.75 0.8

[sage-support] Re: problem with installation ??

2010-08-09 Thread julien
Thanks for the answer, I downloaded the new version on the website (version 4.5) and I followed this tutorial : https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SAGE unfortunately I have still problems : (I guess I will try to compile it myself, is there any clear tutorial to do that ?) Just for info: here is t

[sage-support] Re: Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Istarion
I used the Sage package for VirtualBox off of the main site. It apparently runs on Xfce 4 Desktop Environment, version 4.6.1 On Aug 9, 1:35 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > On 08/ 9/10 08:12 PM, Istarion wrote: > > > I recently installed Ubuntu on my laptop, and started running Sage > > from ther

Re: [sage-support] Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 08/ 9/10 08:12 PM, Istarion wrote: I recently installed Ubuntu on my laptop, and started running Sage from there. Previously, I had used VirtualBox running in Windows Vista to run Sage. However, I upon running one of my programs, I noticed that the program had run about 5 times faster in Virtu

[sage-support] Re: Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Istarion
I am running Sage 4.5 in Ubuntu and Sage 4.3 in VirtualBox. When I checked the relative speed of the program in Ubuntu, I ran it right after booting up, with the only other active process being System Monitor. $ cat /proc/loadavg yields: 0.68 0.75 0.81 1/275 2369. I am very new to Linux, so I actu

[sage-support] Re: Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Harald Schilly
On Aug 9, 9:12 pm, Istarion wrote: > Is this normal, or is there > something weird going on? That's weired. Which version of Sage are you running? (in virtualbox and in ubuntu) Also, the obvious thing, systems get slow if other processes run. What does $ cat /proc/loadavg say? If the first 3 valu

[sage-support] Sage running slowly in Ubuntu compared to VirtualBox

2010-08-09 Thread Istarion
I recently installed Ubuntu on my laptop, and started running Sage from there. Previously, I had used VirtualBox running in Windows Vista to run Sage. However, I upon running one of my programs, I noticed that the program had run about 5 times faster in VirtualBox than it was currently doing so in

[sage-support] Re: Point-set topology in sage?

2010-08-09 Thread jvkersch
Hi all, at this stage I would also like to advertise trac 9650, which if it passes review would add support to Sage for differential form calculations. It's only a "small" step to algebraic topology from there. All the best Joris On 7 aug, 01:21, Mitesh Patel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:

Re: [sage-support] Building 4.5.2 Fails at Docbuild

2010-08-09 Thread Richard Ruth
>Also, which Linux distribution and version are you running? Gentoo Base System release 1.12.13 Kernel: 2.6.34.2 Here are links to two files: install.log: http://sharesend.com/kpcvl What I get when I try to start sage: sage-start.out: http://sharesend.com/p404l If I can provide any more i

[sage-support] regarding arrayobject.h

2010-08-09 Thread Rajeev
Hi, I was trying to work out the first example given in http://wiki.cython.org/WrappingNumpy in sage notebook, but got an error saying arrayobject.h not found. How do I get this example working? Best wishes, Rajeev -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To uns