To add to the mix, I have had no trouble running the virtualbox
version
of sage on my mac (mini, OS 10.5.8)
Dave Galant
On Dec 15, 5:40 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> > I have been unable to get any of the virtualbox sages running on my
> >
>> I think that having a way to make anonymous functions is very
>> important. While, as someone relatively new to sage, I haven't used in
>> sage, I use it all the time in math (For example, my prefered
>> definition of the Mandlebrot set is {x|x ∊ ℂ; lim_(n->∞)
>> (λz:z^2+x)ⁿ(0)≠∞} )...
>>
>> I q
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Rolandb wrote:
> R.=QQ[]
> print sorted([(A, 3), (A - 2*B, 1)])
> print sorted([(-A + 2*B, 1), (A, 3)])
>
> Outcome not equal. Issue of Python or Sage?
I don't think they should necessarily be equal as A - 2*B and -A + 2*B
are different polynomials.
--Mi
Hi, consider:
R.=QQ[]
print sorted([(A, 3), (A - 2*B, 1)])
print sorted([(-A + 2*B, 1), (A, 3)])
Outcome not equal. Issue of Python or Sage?
Roland
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googl
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> I have been unable to get any of the virtualbox sages running on my
> macs. Last time I tried I downloaded virtualbox 3.1, and importing
> the appliance failed on both my mac pro (running 10.4.11) and my
> laptop (running 10.5.something).
On Dec 14, 5:23 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Maybe you are also a lisp lover. But please, let Sage be as close to
> Python as possible!
>
> Jaap
Lisp lover! Now those are fightin' words!
-Marshall
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gro
marcW wrote:
> hi,
> I'm really surprised about the consideration for a remark like a
> newbie like me.
Well, we definitely like to listen to people who give suggestions!
> Of course computational precision is important, the little game i was
> showing leads to a soluion
> around 0.1 for ra
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>>>
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
sage users that come from python to see such a d
Christopher Olah wrote:
> I think that having a way to make anonymous functions is very
> important. While, as someone relatively new to sage, I haven't used in
> sage, I use it all the time in math (For example, my prefered
> definition of the Mandlebrot set is {x|x ∊ ℂ; lim_(n->∞)
> (λz:z^2+x)ⁿ(0
ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> No idea, but I observed also similar problems.
>
> The first idea was that this is problem from mathplotlib, but I
> followed the example at http://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/Matplotlib/UsingTex
> and tried the following
>
> P=plot(x^2,(x,-3,3))
> T=text(r"$\displaystyle\sum
Hi Mikie,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Mikie wrote:
> Is the latex and dvips binary installed in the Sage directory? If so
> where?
If you're asking whether or not LaTeX is distributed with Sage, the
answer is no. If you're asking whether or not dvips is distributed
with Sage, the answer i
Marshall Hampton wrote:
>
> Mathematica's syntax can be quite dense, which has the same
> disadvantage as Perl code in my opinion - it can be hard to read. But
> sometimes it is nice to be able to do so much concisely. I miss it
> sometimes.
>
Maybe you are also a lisp lover. But please, let Sag
Is the latex and dvips binary installed in the Sage directory? If so
where?
Thanx
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.go
I think that having a way to make anonymous functions is very
important. While, as someone relatively new to sage, I haven't used in
sage, I use it all the time in math (For example, my prefered
definition of the Mandlebrot set is {x|x ∊ ℂ; lim_(n->∞)
(λz:z^2+x)ⁿ(0)≠∞} )...
I quite like the idea o
Is there no way now to run Sage under Windows (XP) with VMware
Workstation -- only with VirtualBox?
(I thought VMware Workstation 6.5 should be able to import the virtual
appliance beginning with the sage.ovf file, this being, apparently,
one of the types of things VMware can import. But I get a m
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:31:14PM +0100, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Martin Rubey wrote:
> > Carlos Córdoba writes:
> >
> >> Anyway, the use of anonymous functions is mostly useful on constructs
> >> that operate over lists, like map and reduce. In 10 years of using
> >> Mathematica I've ever needed to d
I have been unable to get any of the virtualbox sages running on my
macs. Last time I tried I downloaded virtualbox 3.1, and importing
the appliance failed on both my mac pro (running 10.4.11) and my
laptop (running 10.5.something). I have had no problems on a windows
xp host.
-Marshall
On Dec
Mathematica's syntax can be quite dense, which has the same
disadvantage as Perl code in my opinion - it can be hard to read. But
sometimes it is nice to be able to do so much concisely. I miss it
sometimes.
-Marshall
On Dec 14, 3:31 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> I truly hope this 'hocus pocus'
Martin Rubey wrote:
> Carlos Córdoba writes:
>
>> Anyway, the use of anonymous functions is mostly useful on constructs
>> that operate over lists, like map and reduce. In 10 years of using
>> Mathematica I've ever needed to derive this kind functions, but
>> nevertheless I've checked if it's poss
Carlos Córdoba writes:
> Anyway, the use of anonymous functions is mostly useful on constructs
> that operate over lists, like map and reduce. In 10 years of using
> Mathematica I've ever needed to derive this kind functions, but
> nevertheless I've checked if it's possible, and indeed it is, for
2009/12/14 Robert Bradshaw
> On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>
> > Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> >> On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
> >>> sage users that come from python to se
On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>>
>>> I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
>>> sage users that come from python to see such a different syntax
>>> meaning.
>>>
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>
>> I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
>> sage users that come from python to see such a different syntax
>> meaning.
>>
>> But what about the Mathematica syntax? Could it be adopted
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
> I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new
> sage users that come from python to see such a different syntax
> meaning.
>
> But what about the Mathematica syntax? Could it be adopted by sage?
The Mathematica synta
On Dec 14, 11:43 am, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
> I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new sage
> users that come from python to see such a different syntax meaning.
>
> But what about the Mathematica syntax? Could it be adopted by sage?
>
> The problem is that most CAS are
On Dec 14, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> I don't know if it's a good idea to make this valid Sage syntax,
>> though.
>>I'm on the fence, but leaning towards not favoring it just because
>> of the added complexity and the departure from true Python, and the
>> python versio
I have to agree with Marshall, because it could be confusing for new sage
users that come from python to see such a different syntax meaning.
But what about the Mathematica syntax? Could it be adopted by sage?
The problem is that most CAS are functional in nature and the first thing
one tries to
I felt ambivalent about adding the "->" until this point. If "->" is
going to mean something else in python eventually, it seems like a bad
idea to overload it in a Sage-specific way.
-Marshall
On Dec 14, 10:01 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>
> Note that -> gets a meaning in Python 3, to ann
Jason Grout wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
>
>> On Dec 14, 9:19 am, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
>>> interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
>>> it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something
kcrisman wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 9:19 am, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>> I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
>> interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
>> it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something that sage devs don't
>> want to do.
Then that sounds like another Python syntax error we could make
available. Not sure we'd want to, though.
- kcrisman
> > for those coming from Maple. What does Mathematica do for such
> > anonymous functions (if anything)?
>
> #^2+1 & (note the & is important; it says what comes before is an
>
kcrisman wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 9:19 am, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>> I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
>> interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
>> it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something that sage devs don't
>> want to do.
On Dec 14, 9:19 am, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
> I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
> interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
> it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something that sage devs don't
> want to do.
>
> Unfortunately pyth
Daniel Farrell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Plot3d() look amazing! I really like the way lighting is used to
> because it help understand the shape of the surface.
>
> I have a data file that I want to plot using plot3d, so I import the
> data using numpy.loadtxt. plot3d() only plots functions so I try
I don't think it would be so hard to do but this could break
interoperability with Python, the language on which Sage is based. Besides
it could make Sage like a dialect of python, something that sage devs don't
want to do.
Unfortunately python is not a very friendly functional programming
languag
Hi folks,
Plot3d() look amazing! I really like the way lighting is used to
because it help understand the shape of the surface.
I have a data file that I want to plot using plot3d, so I import the
data using numpy.loadtxt. plot3d() only plots functions so I try to
interpolate the dataset using sc
36 matches
Mail list logo
