I felt ambivalent about adding the "->" until this point.  If "->" is
going to mean something else in python eventually, it seems like a bad
idea to overload it in a Sage-specific way.

-Marshall

On Dec 14, 10:01 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
<da...@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote:

>
> Note that -> gets a meaning in Python 3, to annotate the result of a
> function:
>
> def foo(a: int) -> float:
>     ...
>
> I don't think this is a technical problem as one can rely on the
> statement to start with "def", but at least -> already means something.
>
> Dag Sverre

-- 
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to