pari(7).isprime() works fine for me in the sage command line with
sage-4.2. What error are you getting?
-M. Hampton
On Nov 2, 9:03 pm, davedo2 wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Thanks for setting me straight on True vs 1. I still wonder though
> about the first part of my question.
> Why does pari(7).ispri
Robert,
Thanks for setting me straight on True vs 1. I still wonder though
about the first part of my question.
Why does pari(7).isprime() work just fine in the notebook, but not
from the Sage command line? Thank you for being patient...Dave
On Nov 2, 3:48 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Nov 2,
On Nov 2, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Justin Domke wrote:
>
> Thanks, that works perfectly! One other question-- is there any way
> to get .html output when "attach"ing a .spyx file? (Perhaps this is
> asking a lot...)
No, I don't imagine it would be super hard to do though.
- Robert
--~--~-
Take a look at my blog for info on a presentation I'm giving involving
Sage!
Goto _http://calcpage.tripod.com_ (http://calcpage.tripod.com) and click
on link for my blog near the top of my website.
TIA,
A. Jorge Garcia
_http://calcpage.tripod.com_ (http://calcpage.tripod.com/)
Teacher
Thanks, that works perfectly! One other question-- is there any way
to get .html output when "attach"ing a .spyx file? (Perhaps this is
asking a lot...)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th
On Nov 2, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Justin Domke wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> When developing cython code, I find the annotation .html files
> (showing yellow lines where python calls are, etc.) useful. I can do
> this from the notebook interface, or (apparently) from command-line
> usage of cython, but I'm n
On Nov 2, 2009, at 3:22 PM, davedo2 wrote:
>
> OK, I downloaded Sage 4.2 and -testall seemed OK. However, I have a
> question: if I evaluate pari(7).isprime() in the notebook it returns
> True, but if I try it from the Sage command line it spawns a longish
> list of errors - what's up with that?
OK, I downloaded Sage 4.2 and -testall seemed OK. However, I have a
question: if I evaluate pari(7).isprime() in the notebook it returns
True, but if I try it from the Sage command line it spawns a longish
list of errors - what's up with that?
Also, is there a way to invoke it such that it return
Hello,
When developing cython code, I find the annotation .html files
(showing yellow lines where python calls are, etc.) useful. I can do
this from the notebook interface, or (apparently) from command-line
usage of cython, but I'm not sure it it is possible to do from the
sage command line. i
Thank you for your answers !!
I was thinking about some multidimensional linear approximation, where
the basis you use is ( for points of coordinates (x_i, y_i ) ) the
vectors
The family of x_i, x_i
The family of x_i, x_i^2
The family of x_i, x_i^3
The family of x_i, x_i^4
...
But it turns out S
> integration. The problem here is that bessel_J is not a symbolic
> function, and does not know how to deal with symbolic variables. It
> would be great if someone submitted a patch to take care of this!
Yes, in an ideal world we would have already taken care of this, since
this sort of numeri
Thanks Jason! That works perfectly.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://grou
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
>> Hello !!!
>>
>> I remember there is an easy way ( through matrices ) to get the
>> "best" approximation of a function by a polynomial of bounded degree
>> ( and not only the usual approximation by a line ) I lo
davier2 ha scritto:
> Is the binary for Ubuntu 9.04 also to be used under Ubuntu 9.10 or
> will a new one be posted?
>
I'm running Sage 4.2 under Karmic, using the file
sage-4.2-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-i686-Linux.tar.gz
Seems to work for me.
Laurent
--~--~-~--~~~---~-
Is the binary for Ubuntu 9.04 also to be used under Ubuntu 9.10 or
will a new one be posted?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups
On Nov 2, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello !!!
>
> I remember there is an easy way ( through matrices ) to get the
> "best" approximation of a function by a polynomial of bounded degree
> ( and not only the usual approximation by a line ) I looked for
> such functions in S
Nathalie Cohen ha scritto:
> Hello !!!
>
> I remember there is an easy way ( through matrices ) to get the "best"
> approximation of a function by a polynomial of bounded degree ( and not only
> the usual approximation by a line )
Are you speaking about the Taylor expansion ?
If so, it is impl
Hello !!!
I remember there is an easy way ( through matrices ) to get the "best"
approximation of a function by a polynomial of bounded degree ( and not only
the usual approximation by a line ) I looked for such functions in Sage,
but found none... Does it mean there is not already in Sage som
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:18 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 5:34 pm, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> This one had me stumped for a while. I'm using 4.1.1 here, but found the
>> same results in a 4.1.2 notebook. The solve_foo() methods are broken,
>> too; probably as a consequence.
>>
>> # G
Thanks,
that fixed it. I Downloaded the fonts and unpacked them to the
~/.fonts/ directory.
On Oct 30, 4:43 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> > On 30 říj, 13:30, Flavio Coelho wrote:
> >> I forgot to mention my platform:
>
> >> Ubuntu Karmic Koala,
> >> Firefox 3.5.3
>
> >
On Nov 1, 5:34 pm, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> This one had me stumped for a while. I'm using 4.1.1 here, but found the
> same results in a 4.1.2 notebook. The solve_foo() methods are broken,
> too; probably as a consequence.
>
> # Good
>
> sage: m = matrix([ [(-3/10), (1/5), (1/10)],
>
On 2 Nov., 09:08, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Dear Wilfried,
>
> The tutorial looks great! How did you do the numbered head lines and the
> index?
Just use ... tags in the notebook. They are converted to
\sections{}
in the LaTeX file. The the worksheet the sections are not numbered.
> Is the
Dear Wilfried,
The tutorial looks great! How did you do the numbered head lines and the
index? Is the sage worksheet itself published somewhere?
Cheers
Stan
Wilfried_Huss wrote:
>
> On 29 Okt., 12:44, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>
>> Hello all, the conversion into PDF has been discussed seve
23 matches
Mail list logo
