On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> In IRC, there was a report about the "SSSE3" and PNI flags for the
> following Ubuntu binary:
>
> sage-4.0.2-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-i686-Linux.tar.gz
>
> Here's the IRC log:
>
> 15:39 < nifgraup> Hi,I would like to report a packaging/
Hi folks,
In IRC, there was a report about the "SSSE3" and PNI flags for the
following Ubuntu binary:
sage-4.0.2-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-i686-Linux.tar.gz
Here's the IRC log:
15:39 < nifgraup> Hi,I would like to report a packaging/build bug in sage
4.0.2, can someone guide me?
15:4
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:31 PM, mmarco wrote:
>
> Let me give some more details about my question: i have a number field
> K, and a ring of polynomials over it, R1. I also have a ring
> homomorphism from K to QQbar (which actually makes all sense from a
> mathematical point of view), and a ring o
Yes, I am calling Scipy functions from a standard Python, thus no
preparser. It does not recognize 1r, 10r, etc.
Is there anyway to get it to work? I have also tried R, but r.binom
does not work.
On Jul 6, 3:16 pm, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> If you're calling Scipy functions from a standard Python e
Let me give some more details about my question: i have a number field
K, and a ring of polynomials over it, R1. I also have a ring
homomorphism from K to QQbar (which actually makes all sense from a
mathematical point of view), and a ring of polynomials R2 over QQbar.
All this should give a map
Maybe you can use:
sage: RealNumber=float; Integer=int
or, explicitly define the number type when calling the scipy function.
Good luck,
Kevin Horton
On 6 Jul 2009, at 15:57, Mikie wrote:
>
> Ahmed,
>
> Looks good, but I am creating a function in python that is called.
> And 1r, .56r ,etc. d
If you're calling Scipy functions from a standard Python environment,
you won't have the pre-processor issues, so I may be misunderstanding
what your underlying problem is.
Assuming you are in Sage (since this is a Sage mailing list) and
calling Scipy, other options that achieve the same effect a
Kevin,
It worked.
Thanks, a lot.
On Jul 6, 3:33 pm, Kevin Horton wrote:
> Maybe you can use:
>
> sage: RealNumber=float; Integer=int
>
> or, explicitly define the number type when calling the scipy function.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Kevin Horton
>
> On 6 Jul 2009, at 15:57, Mikie wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Ethan Van Andel wrote:
>
> When I show() a graphics object such as plot(x,-1,1), it plots it in
> the desired range, but also adds a sort "buffer" around the image, the
> axes extend beyond the region I told it to show, in the case of plot
> (x) instead of [-1,1],[-
Ahmed,
Looks good, but I am creating a function in python that is called.
And 1r, .56r ,etc. does not pass. I am taking these parameters from a
form and then using the function.
Is there a work-a-round?
Thanks
On Jul 3, 6:19 pm, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> This is also an excellent resource: "How To
When I show() a graphics object such as plot(x,-1,1), it plots it in
the desired range, but also adds a sort "buffer" around the image, the
axes extend beyond the region I told it to show, in the case of plot
(x) instead of [-1,1],[-1,1] its more like [-1.5,1.5]. This persists
if I specify the sho
Perhaps working in the symbolic ring is causing something you don't
like. In David's example above, you might want to convert things to
CDF, which gives:
sage: a = CDF(1 + 3*I)
sage: z = log(a)
sage: z
1.1512925465 + 1.2490457724*I
...instead of
sage: a = 1 + 3*I
sage: z = log(a)
sage: z
log(3*
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:25 PM, mac8090 wrote:
>
> when I try to take logarithms of a complex number sage version 3.5
> doesn't like it. How do I find/use a multiplication preserving
> embedding to make it work?
I don't understand the question. In the latest version you get this:
sage: a = 1 +
when I try to take logarithms of a complex number sage version 3.5
doesn't like it. How do I find/use a multiplication preserving
embedding to make it work?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
I have a polynomial ring over an algebraic field, and a polynomial
ring over the algebraic numbers. I have defined a ring homomorphism
from the number field to QQbar, but i don't know how to build a
morphism that does the extension of scalars.
¿How can that be achieved?
--~--~-~--~~-
15 matches
Mail list logo
