On Apr 16, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Chris Seberino wrote:
> Which Sage tarball/package should I use for Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty
> beta) ??
>
> The Ubuntu 8.10 tarball doesn't work there. I get
>
> "9587 Illegal instruction"
I would recommend building from source. Takes up to several hours,
but rarely r
On Apr 16, 10:33 pm, Chris Seberino wrote:
Hi Chris,
> Which Sage tarball/package should I use for Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty
> beta) ??
>
> The Ubuntu 8.10 tarball doesn't work there. I get
>
> "9587 Illegal instruction"
Did you remove the sage-flags.txt after you got a warning? Then this
is a pr
Which Sage tarball/package should I use for Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty
beta) ??
The Ubuntu 8.10 tarball doesn't work there. I get
"9587 Illegal instruction"
cs
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
2009/4/16 Steve Finch :
>
> Hi again,
>
> Let M_{3/2}(N) be the space of modular forms of weight 3/2, level N
> and trivial character.
>
> It seems that the Cohen-Oesterle (CO) dimensions are too small. For
> example, let
>
> f(z) = 1 + 6*q + 12*q^2 + ...
>
> be the (unique) basis element of M_{3
On Apr 16, 2009, at 1:58 AM, Flavio Coelho wrote:
>
> I wonder if it would be possible, when in python mode: "%python", Sage
> would revert to use standard python (and numpy) types.
>
> I can now replicate my previous bug report with just a line of python
> (excluding the import):
>
> %python
> f
Actually, I think that by calling "conjugacy_classes_representatives"
conjugacy classes are already computed, so didn't want to do all the
work twice. A possible improvement of the algorithm could be something
like this:
def conjugacy_classes(G):
classes = []
G_set = Set(G)
while len(
Is there anyway in Sage to have the calculation not performed? In
integrate just see the integral. With Mupad it is (hold).
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email t
David Joyner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:05 AM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Maybe I'm being dumb, but it seems like you haven't provided a link
>> anywhere in this email or in the emails quoted below to the actual
>> book and
Hi again,
Let M_{3/2}(N) be the space of modular forms of weight 3/2, level N
and trivial character.
It seems that the Cohen-Oesterle (CO) dimensions are too small. For
example, let
f(z) = 1 + 6*q + 12*q^2 + ...
be the (unique) basis element of M_{3/2}(4) and
g(z) = 1 + 2*q + 4*q^2 + ...
be
Dear all,
I have a question about using sage.geometry.polyhedra - I am currently
trying to use the package with unbounded domains. I get a strange
behaviour with simple tests:
polyh1 = ieq_to_vert([[1,1,1]])
print polyh1.ieqs()
returns
[[1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1], [1, 1, 1]]
and
polyh1 = ieq_to_ve
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:05 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>>
...
>>
>
> Maybe I'm being dumb, but it seems like you haven't provided a link
> anywhere in this email or in the emails quoted below to the actual
> book and cover that you're tal
I wonder if it would be possible, when in python mode: "%python", Sage
would revert to use standard python (and numpy) types.
I can now replicate my previous bug report with just a line of python
(excluding the import):
%python
from scipy import stats
stats.randint(0,23).ppf(3)
I don't see why
Dear William
thank you very much indeed!
Great work of yours,
Best
-- Giovanni
On Apr 15, 8:24 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, giovanni.marche...@ds.unifi.it
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> > Dynamic Sage notebooks are really amazing.
>
> > I'm also an R user and I would like
13 matches
Mail list logo
