Actually, I think that by calling "conjugacy_classes_representatives"
conjugacy classes are already computed, so didn't want to do all the
work twice. A possible improvement of the algorithm could be something
like this:

def conjugacy_classes(G):
    classes = []
    G_set = Set(G)
    while len(G_set)!=0:
        g = G_set[0]
        cg = conjugacy_class(G,g)
        classes.append(cg)
        G_set = G_set.symmetric_difference(cg)
    return Set(classes)

but since I am not a group theorist, I don't know if there is a better
algorithm out there, so I assumed that GAP function would be more
efficient than anything I could possibly come up with, that's why I
was asking if there was a native SAGE wrapping of it.

Concerning the math, I need the conjugacy classes as sets in order to
compute some invariants given by noncommutative geometry, where
bicovariant differential calculi over (the Hopf algebra of) finite
groups are in 1-1 correspondence with (unions of) conjugacy classes
satisfying certain properties. My hope is that the NC invariants yield
some information about the group itself, and am trying to compute a
number of examples to get some intuition on what's going on.

Anyway, I got first version of my program running and was able to
compute things for a dozen not-so-small groups without much trouble,
so I guess what I have might do the trick for now.

Thank you all for your help!

Cheers
Javier

On Apr 15, 9:04 pm, David Joyner <wdjoy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't see how conjugacyclass can be done more efficiently.
> Of course,
>
> def conjugacyclasses(group):
>   return Set([conjugacyclass(group, g) for g in group])
>
> should really be
>
> def conjugacyclasses(group):
>   reps = group.conjugacy_classes_representatives()
>   return Set([conjugacyclass(group, g) for g in reps])
>
> But really even this is impossible to do fast for large groups.
> For computational problems involving permutation groups, my
> understanding was that you should generally try very hard to
> only deal with *representatives* of conjugacy classes, but
> the original question seemed to indicate he didn't want to use
> that command for some reason.
>
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding something?
>
>
>
> > - Robert
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to