Hello,
On Mar 21, 10:13 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folk,
>
> I may be missing something here, but when I tried to plot 0 = x^2 +
> y^2 - z^2 I received an error:
What you want is implicit 3d plotting which is not in Sage (yet). See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5249 for preliminar
Hi folk,
I may be missing something here, but when I tried to plot 0 = x^2 +
y^2 - z^2 I received an error:
*** begin Sage session ***
sage: var("x,y,z");
sage: f = x^2 + y^2 - z^2
sage: plot3d(f == 0, (x,-4,4), (y,-4,4), (z,-4,4));
ERROR: An unexpected error occurred while tokenizing input
The
> Note that you're skipping the last conductor in the database, I
> think... DB.conductor_range? indicates that the returned values
> represent an inclusive range, but range/xrange/etc. take their second
> argument as an exclusive bound. (This is easy to fix with the above
> xrange expression, bu
ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> Hello, this is related to the thread at
> http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/2a699360a3847bab
>
> I think that installation of
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/5564/trac_5564-2.patch
> causes that TinyMCE cannot be used
ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> Hello, this is related to the thread at
> http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/2a699360a3847bab
>
> I think that installation of
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/5564/trac_5564-2.patch
> causes that TinyMCE cannot be used
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Byungchul Cha wrote:
>
>
> I must misunderstand something very trivial. I followed the steps
> described at the release tour of Sage 3.3, except that I replaced 3.3
> with 3.4, since I thought I was compiling sage-3.4. Compiling was
> successful and when I di
Hi John,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:28 AM, John G wrote:
>
> I just downloaded Sage 3.4 for Mac OSX (sage-3.4-Intel-OSX10.5-i386-
> Darwin.dmg). I installed it without trouble, but trying to run it I
> get the errors below. I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.11 on an Intel Core
> Duo Mac Mini. What am I
On Mar 21, 2009, at 7:28 PM, John G wrote:
> I just downloaded Sage 3.4 for Mac OSX (sage-3.4-Intel-OSX10.5-i386-
> Darwin.dmg). I installed it without trouble, but trying to run it I
> get the errors below. I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.11 on an Intel Core
> Duo Mac Mini. What am I doing wrong? I
I just downloaded Sage 3.4 for Mac OSX (sage-3.4-Intel-OSX10.5-i386-
Darwin.dmg). I installed it without trouble, but trying to run it I
get the errors below. I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.11 on an Intel Core
Duo Mac Mini. What am I doing wrong? Is there a different version of
Sage specifically for
On Mar 21, 2009, at 6:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Alasdair wrote:
>>
>> Is pynac still being actively developed?
>
> Yes.
>
>> From its web pages it seems
>> not; anyway I would have thought that most of its functionality would
>> have found a better and bet
Rob Beezer wrote:
> Robert,
>
> I'm not having this problem. 3.4 and Firefox 3.0.5 (ubuntu).
>
> When I double-click to get back into TinyMCE, I do get a small grey
> box with "int x dx" (no quotes, no dollar signs) and a small square
> that closes the box, overlaid on the editor. I've not not
Robert,
I'm not having this problem. 3.4 and Firefox 3.0.5 (ubuntu).
When I double-click to get back into TinyMCE, I do get a small grey
box with "int x dx" (no quotes, no dollar signs) and a small square
that closes the box, overlaid on the editor. I've not not seen that
before, but it goes a
Hey, I would like that script too, thanks. btw, can you have it do a
notebook too?
andrew
On Mar 21, 11:17 am, adam wrote:
> You can use AppleScript to create a launcher for Sage:
> Here is the AppleScript code:
>
> tell application "Terminal"
> do script "/Applications/sage/sage"
> end
On Mar 21, 7:54 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM, meitnik wrote:
>
> > Sorry for my confusion and misunderstanding. Thought the whole Gui was
> > all in Javascript.
>
> The client part, which runs in the web browser, is written in
> javascript. The server part is a Pyt
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Alasdair wrote:
>
> Is pynac still being actively developed?
Yes.
> From its web pages it seems
> not; anyway I would have thought that most of its functionality would
> have found a better and better-maintained home in Sage.
Pynac exists only as a part of sag
Is pynac still being actively developed? From its web pages it seems
not; anyway I would have thought that most of its functionality would
have found a better and better-maintained home in Sage.
Anyway, I've just discovered that all of this can be done using
Maxima:
p=expand((1+x+1/y)^10)
maxim
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 5:52 pm, Nils Bruin wrote:
>> sage: DB = CremonaDatabase()
>> sage: L = [ N.str()+c[0] for N in (lambda l: xrange(l[0],l[1]))
>> (DB.conductor_range()) for c in DB.allbsd(N).items() if
>> round(RDF(c[1][4]))%81 ==
On Mar 20, 5:52 pm, Nils Bruin wrote:
> sage: DB = CremonaDatabase()
> sage: L = [ N.str()+c[0] for N in (lambda l: xrange(l[0],l[1]))
> (DB.conductor_range()) for c in DB.allbsd(N).items() if
> round(RDF(c[1][4]))%81 == 0]
...
> - the whole lambda expression to make the pair ou
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM, meitnik wrote:
>
> Sorry for my confusion and misunderstanding. Thought the whole Gui was
> all in Javascript.
The client part, which runs in the web browser, is written in
javascript. The server part is a Python program (a web server).
> Thanks for explaining.
Sorry for my confusion and misunderstanding. Thought the whole Gui was
all in Javascript.
Thanks for explaining.
Please, is there a document that explains well how the Gui front end
works.
I really would like to try to get help and add to the gui for my
needs.
Is there an RTF version of the Ref gu
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Jason Bandlow wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is the following missing coercion known? I couldn't find anything on
>> trac, but there's a lot there related to coercion, so I may have
>> missed it.
>>
>> sage: a = float(1.0)
>> sage: QQ(
On Mar 21, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Jason Bandlow wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is the following missing coercion known? I couldn't find anything on
> trac, but there's a lot there related to coercion, so I may have
> missed it.
>
> sage: a = float(1.0)
> sage: QQ(a)
> TypeError: Unable to
Hernan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any way to use scipy.constants in sage?
>
When was it made part of scipy? We may have a version in Sage that is
too old:
sage: import scipy
sage: scipy.__version__
'0.6.0'
sage: import scipy.constants
---
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 03:02:57 -0700
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2009, at 2:01 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
>
> >> I think that better way is to use maxima commands op, args, length,
> >> atomp
> >>
> >
> > I think that for objects which come from Maxima, this is the right
> > thing to do. H
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:56 AM, meitnik wrote:
>
> I hate to ask the obvious. Why was the gui front end not created in
> Python in the first place or replaced by a Py make over??
Despite being obvious, I don't understand the question. The GUI front
end is written in Python and Javascript, whi
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jason Bandlow wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I ran into the following unexpected behavior, which I assume is because
> the preparser does not work with nested loads. I have two files,
> foo.sage and bar.sage. Their contents are as follows:
>
> foo.sage
>
> def
Hello, this is related to the thread at
http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/2a699360a3847bab
I think that installation of
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/5564/trac_5564-2.patch
causes that TinyMCE cannot be used to edit mathematical formulas
If I
The thread linked to below begins the same way. Maybe it has the
answer you need.
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/6fc59581c9ed1af1
On Mar 21, 8:14 am, nerak99 wrote:
> Having played with Sage on a desktop PC I wanted to set it up as a
> school wide service. I
Hi all,
I ran into the following unexpected behavior, which I assume is because
the preparser does not work with nested loads. I have two files,
foo.sage and bar.sage. Their contents are as follows:
foo.sage
def foo():
return (-1)**(-1)
bar.sage
load foo.sage
The follow
Hi all,
Is the following missing coercion known? I couldn't find anything on
trac, but there's a lot there related to coercion, so I may have missed it.
sage: a = float(1.0)
sage: QQ(a)
TypeError: Unable to coerce 1.0 () to Rational
Note that the following works:
> No, the format for multiple edges in a dict of dicts is {u : {v :
> [label1, label2]} }. Since you don't have the innermost list, the
> graph is assumed to have one edge 1 --> 2 labeled by "2."
My bad, I misread your complaint. That's definitely a bug.
--~--~-~--~~~-
> > sage: G = DiGraph({1:{2: 2}, 2:{1:1}})
> > sage: G.show()
>
> I'm surprised by the output of this. There are clearly two edges in the
> graph: 1->2 and 2->1, but only one edge is shown.
No, the format for multiple edges in a dict of dicts is {u : {v :
[label1, label2]} }. Since you don't hav
Having played with Sage on a desktop PC I wanted to set it up as a
school wide service. I set it up on a server but got this message.
sage-3.4-linux-Fedora_release_10_Cambridge-x86_64-Linux#
./sage
--
| Sage Version 3.4, Release
You can use AppleScript to create a launcher for Sage:
Here is the AppleScript code:
tell application "Terminal"
do script "/Applications/sage/sage"
end tell
Note: It assumes that Sage is located in the Applications
folder.
If you would like I can email you my Sage launcher for
which I
I hate to ask the obvious. Why was the gui front end not created in
Python in the first place or replaced by a Py make over?? Surely,
Someone with advanced Javascript skills can come up with something
better? I dont mean to step on toes but Gui is often everything to me
to use software well.
--
Nope, worksheet barfed trying this. I suspect the huge text info was
just too much. Cant this be rerouted to a text file while its loops
through. If so, how?
On Mar 21, 12:21 am, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> There might be a better way of doing this, but one way to get the
> docstrings that show up
nope that code snippet failed to work too in a worksheet. see my
comment in above posting of mine.
I am surprised its this hard to suck out all the keywords/functions
with their docstring stuff. How was the PDF produced? Cant that code
be shared so I can hack it to get just what I need.
On Mar 21
Hello,
Is there any way to use scipy.constants in sage?
Thanks,
Hernan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more opti
On Mar 21, 2009, at 2:01 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
>> I think that better way is to use maxima commands op, args, length,
>> atomp
>>
>
> I think that for objects which come from Maxima, this is the right
> thing to do. However, not all symbolic objects in Sage are wrappers
> for Maxima objects -- i
> I think that better way is to use maxima commands op, args, length,
> atomp
>
I think that for objects which come from Maxima, this is the right
thing to do. However, not all symbolic objects in Sage are wrappers
for Maxima objects -- in the case of expressions using pynac, the code
above actua
On Mar 21, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Rolandb wrote:
> Hi, I didn't expect that whole M would be effected.
>
> M=[[0..9]]*3
> print M[0]
> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
>
> M[1].remove(9)
> print M
> [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], [0, 1, 2,
> 3,
> 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]]
This is due
Hi, I didn't expect that whole M would be effected.
M=[[0..9]]*3
print M[0]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
M[1].remove(9)
print M
[[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], [0, 1, 2,
3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8]]
Rolandb
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
On 21 Bře, 07:05, Craig Citro wrote:
> > That works well, but what about when the expression is multivariate,
> > such as:
>
> > expand((1+x+1/y)^10)
>
> > It would be nice to have a general command to count the number of
> > summands in such an expression.
>
> Yep, I agree. Here is a *terrible*
meitnik a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I am legally blind, legally deaf, some limited finger mobility, and
> some learning disabilities too (all from Rubella). I enjoy mathematics
> and programming but due to my limited income Mathematica is just out
> of my reach even for the Home edition. A friend told
44 matches
Mail list logo
