[sage-support] Re: 3D animation

2009-02-24 Thread Crab
Thanks, but I forgot to say my colleague has actually looked into Jmol and his conclusion is that the language is a bit too "Chemistry oriented" for him. That's why he goes back to use Mathematica. I surely hope SAGE can tap into the power of Jmol in a not too distant future. Meanwhile we will gi

[sage-support] Re: 3D animation

2009-02-24 Thread Jason Grout
pong wrote: > A colleague of mine would like to produce some 3D animation (an > illustration involving cones and spheres). He looked into SAGE and > said it will be difficult compare to Mathematica and so he decided to > use the latter. > > By reading this group, I understand one can render the i

[sage-support] 3D animation

2009-02-24 Thread pong
A colleague of mine would like to produce some 3D animation (an illustration involving cones and spheres). He looked into SAGE and said it will be difficult compare to Mathematica and so he decided to use the latter. By reading this group, I understand one can render the images via tachyon then p

[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage

2009-02-24 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jason Grout >> wrote: >>> Ondrej Certik wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >> On Feb 17,

[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage

2009-02-24 Thread Jason Grout
Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jason Grout > wrote: >> Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: > On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >> schmmd wrote: >>> I don

[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage

2009-02-24 Thread leonardo parada
..can I do PDF for print in SAGE?? 2009/2/24 Ondrej Certik > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jason Grout > wrote: > > > > Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik > wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty > wrote: > On Feb 17, 1:09 pm,

[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage

2009-02-24 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > schmmd wrote: >> I don't seem to be able to pretty

[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage

2009-02-24 Thread Jason Grout
Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >>> On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: schmmd wrote: > I don't seem to be able to pretty print in sage. I remember doing > this in class, but the

[sage-support] Re: Cannot pretty print in sage

2009-02-24 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >> >> On Feb 17, 1:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >>> schmmd wrote: >>> > I don't seem to be able to pretty print in sage.  I remember doing >>> > this in class, but the pretty_print function g

[sage-support] Re: polynomial coercion bug?

2009-02-24 Thread Alex Raichev
Thanks for your clarification and help, Carl. Alex On Feb 24, 5:15 pm, Carl Witty wrote: > On Feb 23, 7:57 pm, Carl Witty wrote: > > > On Feb 23, 6:54 pm, Alex Raichev wrote: > > > > Carl, regarding the parenthetical remark of your first reply, are you > > > saying the coercion error for plai

[sage-support] Re: block matrix viewing

2009-02-24 Thread John H Palmieri
On Feb 24, 9:56 am, kcrisman wrote: > This is # 5359 now. > > By the way, the trac update is nice - love the "Draft" background! > > - kcrisman I posted a partial patch, but I don't know how to fix this in the notebook: the "right way" to do it is to use \hline where you want a horizontal line,

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread kcrisman
> > I would personally be fine with downloading *never* including the > revision history?  That would keep the interface simple. > > Would anybody not like that? -1 I could imagine a situation (e.g. for grading purposes, or recovering accidentally deleted things on a worksheet previously downlo

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 12:38 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) >> >> >> >> mabshoff wrote: >> >> > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): >

[sage-support] ideals of points

2009-02-24 Thread davidp
Hi, I have the following homogeneous Singular ideal defining a finite set of points in projective space. I would like to get numerical approximations for these points. sage: S.ring() // characteristic : 0 // number of vars : 4 //block 1 : ordering dp // : names

[sage-support] Re: block matrix viewing

2009-02-24 Thread kcrisman
This is # 5359 now. By the way, the trac update is nice - love the "Draft" background! - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googl

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread kcrisman
On Feb 24, 12:38 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) > > > > mabshoff wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only"

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: > > Hi, > > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option > > under "File..."  or "Download Text File

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: Hi, > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option > under "File..."  or "Download Text File Only" or something like that > (which would still be accepted as an upload, of co

[sage-support] Re: block matrix viewing

2009-02-24 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 24, 9:11 am, kcrisman wrote: > Bump.  Again, I'd be happy to open a ticket but first would like > confirmation that this is, in fact, a bug, and not desired > functionality. > > - kcrisman Looks like a bug to me. Please open a ticket. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~--

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread kcrisman
Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option under "File..." or "Download Text File Only" or something like that (which would still be accepted as an upload, of course)? Even when one clicks "Text", it still prints a

[sage-support] Re: block matrix viewing

2009-02-24 Thread kcrisman
Bump. Again, I'd be happy to open a ticket but first would like confirmation that this is, in fact, a bug, and not desired functionality. - kcrisman On Feb 17, 2:56 pm, kcrisman wrote: > Dear Support, > > Viewing block matrices "nicely" seems to be difficult in Sage. > > sage: A=matrix([[1]])

[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.3 released [pynac webpage]

2009-02-24 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:09 AM, David Joyner wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:41 AM, William Stein wrote: >> > >> >> I am going to make >> >>http://pynac.sagemath.org/ >> >> the official website for pynac. Right now it is just a trivial >> 1-minute webpage I made... > > I don't seem to

[sage-support] Re: Sage 3.3 released [pynac webpage]

2009-02-24 Thread David Joyner
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:41 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > I am going to make > >    http://pynac.sagemath.org/ > > the official website for pynac.  Right now it is just a trivial > 1-minute webpage I made... I don't seem to be able to access it at all now. > > William > > > > --~--~