[sage-support] Re: polynomial coercion bug?

2009-02-19 Thread Carl Witty
On Feb 19, 10:16 pm, Carl Witty wrote: > There's a bug.  And, now that you've pointed out the bug, I figured > out how to crash Sage with a segmentation fault; so it's a serious > bug.  Thanks for reporting it!  This bug is now being tracked at > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5316 OK

[sage-support] Re: polynomial coercion bug?

2009-02-19 Thread Carl Witty
On Feb 19, 7:59 pm, Alex Raichev wrote: > Hi all: > > I get an error when i try to coerce monomials of a multivariate > polynomial ring over a number field to the corresponding polynomial > ring over QQbar.  Shouldn't this work?  They're monomials; no > coefficients.  Here's an example. > > Alex

[sage-support] polynomial coercion bug?

2009-02-19 Thread Alex Raichev
Hi all: I get an error when i try to coerce monomials of a multivariate polynomial ring over a number field to the corresponding polynomial ring over QQbar. Shouldn't this work? They're monomials; no coefficients. Here's an example. Alex --

[sage-support] Re: Using sage as default python distribution

2009-02-19 Thread Carl Witty
On Feb 19, 3:54 pm, Art wrote: > I would like to use the sage distribution as my default python > distribution transparently. If I type python at the command line, I > would like sage -python to be called and #/usr/bin/env python at the > start of any script to call the sage python as well. > > H

[sage-support] Re: OverflowError: math range error in matplotlib

2009-02-19 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM, M. Yurko wrote: > > First off, I know that this is specificaly a SAGE issue, but I can't > find a matplotlib list, so I'm hoping that someone here can help. I > recieve an error when executing the following code in the notebook: > > #Create the graph > import pyla

[sage-support] Re: Using sage as default python distribution

2009-02-19 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Art wrote: > > I would like to use the sage distribution as my default python > distribution transparently. If I type python at the command line, I > would like sage -python to be called and #/usr/bin/env python at the > start of any script to call the sage python

[sage-support] Using sage as default python distribution

2009-02-19 Thread Art
I would like to use the sage distribution as my default python distribution transparently. If I type python at the command line, I would like sage -python to be called and #/usr/bin/env python at the start of any script to call the sage python as well. How can I do this? Also, can I use easy_ins

[sage-support] OverflowError: math range error in matplotlib

2009-02-19 Thread M. Yurko
First off, I know that this is specificaly a SAGE issue, but I can't find a matplotlib list, so I'm hoping that someone here can help. I recieve an error when executing the following code in the notebook: #Create the graph import pylab pylab.clf() pylab.figure(1) pylab.plot(xs, bits24_original, l

[sage-support] re Stepen Lucas's "Integral approximations to Pi with nonnegative integrands"

2009-02-19 Thread Alexander Povolotsky
Hi, S. K. Lukas in http://www.math.jmu.edu/~lucassk/Papers/more%20on%20pi.pdf derived several identities, which relate Pi (via definite integrals) with the several few Pi fractional convergents, which denominators and numerators are d

[sage-support] Re: test failing for sage 3.2.3, CentOS-5 x86_64 devel/sage/sage/rings/finite_field_ntl_gf2e.pyx

2009-02-19 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 19, 1:51 pm, Tru Huynh wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I have just download and compile sage-3.2.3 on CentOS-5 x86_64 > a RHEL5 clone and the make tests is failing for > devel/sage/sage/rings/finite_field_ntl_gf2e.pyx > > The only relevant entry I found > is:http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/

[sage-support] test failing for sage 3.2.3, CentOS-5 x86_64 devel/sage/sage/rings/finite_field_ntl_gf2e.pyx

2009-02-19 Thread Tru Huynh
Hi, I have just download and compile sage-3.2.3 on CentOS-5 x86_64 a RHEL5 clone and the make tests is failing for devel/sage/sage/rings/finite_field_ntl_gf2e.pyx -- The following tests failed: sage -t "devel/sage/sa

[sage-support] re Stepen Lucas's Maple program "Integral approximations to Pi with nonnegative integrands"

2009-02-19 Thread Alexander R.Povolotsky
I am looking for help/cooperation in experimental researching of the possibility of deriving generalized ("n" parameter based ) definite integral identity relating Pi with ALL (each at its own value of n) Pi fractional convergents described in http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A002486 h

[sage-support] re Stepen Lucas's Maple program "Integral approximations to Pi with nonnegative integrands"

2009-02-19 Thread Alexander R.Povolotsky
I am looking for help/cooperation in experimental researching of the possibility of deriving generalized ("n" parameter based ) definite integral identity relating Pi with ALL (each at its own value of n) Pi fractional convergents described in http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A002486 h

[sage-support] Re: plots in sage-view, within emacs

2009-02-19 Thread Marshall Hampton
Anyone interested in the answers to this topic should check out the parallel sage-devel thread: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1b850e2221c4df3c/29603143767d47d9#29603143767d47d9 -M. Hampton On Feb 18, 2:16 pm, Pierre wrote: > hello all, > > I've installed the la

[sage-support] Re: Error 1335 and Error 2350

2009-02-19 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 19, 7:11 am, leonardoparada wrote: Hi, > I am trying install SAGE. > I am following steps. > 1.- Install VMWare player <-- I had downloaded > fromhttp://www.vmware.com/products/player/ > > I  start VMWare installation process and I get ERROR 1335 and ERROR > 2350 > > Any can help

[sage-support] Error 1335 and Error 2350

2009-02-19 Thread leonardoparada
I am trying install SAGE. I am following steps. 1.- Install VMWare player <-- I had downloaded from http://www.vmware.com/products/player/ I start VMWare installation process and I get ERROR 1335 and ERROR 2350 Any can help me?..please? Here some Screenshoots http://leonardoparada.cl/image

[sage-support] Re: moving spkg between versions - is it possible - QuantLib

2009-02-19 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 19, 2:15 am, tomanizer wrote: > Hi All, Hi Thomas, > I successfully built the experimental QuantLib spkg for Sage 3.0. > That took quite a while on my slow machine. Yeah, building the Swing extension of Quantlib is painful. > You can check it out here:http://highburyplace.no-ip.org:4

[sage-support] moving spkg between versions - is it possible - QuantLib

2009-02-19 Thread tomanizer
Hi All, I successfully built the experimental QuantLib spkg for Sage 3.0. That took quite a while on my slow machine. You can check it out here: http://highburyplace.no-ip.org:443/home/pub/3/ (I will only be able to keep this link it live for a couple of days) I've now installed Sage 3.2. Can I