> Use
>
> show(foo)
>
> to typeset an output line, which won't word wrap.
This gives me latex output?
> Or, after getting output as you do above, just click to the left of
> the output to toggle through:
> word wrap --> no word wrap --> hide
This works!
Thanks a lot.
Mate
--~--~---
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:42 PM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
>
> Is this similar to making it easy to post @interact demonstrations on
> webpages including a blog?
Well, there is a new Python blog engine being done by some of the
same people who did Sphinx.
http://zine.pocoo.org/
It would be nice if
Is this similar to making it easy to post @interact demonstrations on
webpages including a blog?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Skylar wrote:
>>
>> Well, I am certainly no javascript master. I think maybe the best
>> that I can do is
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Skylar wrote:
>
> Well, I am certainly no javascript master. I think maybe the best
> that I can do is to understand the simple server and build from there.
>
> Maybe I can do it in some number of months half-time. It would be a
> useful adaptation to introduce
Well, I am certainly no javascript master. I think maybe the best
that I can do is to understand the simple server and build from there.
Maybe I can do it in some number of months half-time. It would be a
useful adaptation to introduce kids to sage that don't necessarily
need to be managing who
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mate Kosor wrote:
>
> I am using Sage workbook 3.2.3. in Mozilla Firefox 3.0.5 I have a
> problem with matrix output.
>
> Line:
> matrix([[diff(v_r(r, z), r), 0, diff(v_z(r, z), r)/2], [0, 0, 0],[diff
> (v_z(r, z), r,)/2, 0, 0]])
>
> produces output where one mat
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alex Raichev wrote:
>
> Hi everyone:
>
> I'm applying for a grant from the New Zealand government to fund some
> Sage development in the area of computational algebraic and analytic
> geometry. For part of the application i need to report on the 'state
> of the f
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Skylar wrote:
>
>> I was rather hoping to keep all of the great js/css and everything
>> having to do with the cell like the tab completion and the way that
>> the input and output are handled - all are fanta
I am wondering if anyone on this list has managed to glue a cell of
the notebook onto a content-driven web application. If anyone has any
ideas on this front I would be interested to hear them.
Skylar Saveland
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send emai
On Jan 19, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Skylar wrote:
> I was rather hoping to keep all of the great js/css and everything
> having to do with the cell like the tab completion and the way that
> the input and output are handled - all are fantastic in the notebook.
> I was just hoping that I could send a sin
On Jan 19, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Skylar wrote:
> Yes, I am starting to understand how I can use that. What are the
> sleep(0.5), sleep(1)'s there for? I know that they delay execution.
> I don't know exactly what that means and why it would be useful in the
> code in that docstring.
The sleeps are
Hi everyone:
I'm applying for a grant from the New Zealand government to fund some
Sage development in the area of computational algebraic and analytic
geometry. For part of the application i need to report on the 'state
of the field'. Part of my response to this will be to mention that
Sage do
I was rather hoping to keep all of the great js/css and everything
having to do with the cell like the tab completion and the way that
the input and output are handled - all are fantastic in the notebook.
I was just hoping that I could send a single cell the way that it is
displayed and functionin
Yes, I am starting to understand how I can use that. What are the
sleep(0.5), sleep(1)'s there for? I know that they delay execution.
I don't know exactly what that means and why it would be useful in the
code in that docstring.
On Jan 19, 5:52 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> Yes, use the simp
You're right. This is what I meant:
sage: L = [vector([1,0,0]), vector([1,2,0]), vector([1,0,3]), vector([1,0,0])]
sage: LL = [tuple(v.list()) for v in L]
sage: Set(LL)
{(1, 0, 0), (1, 0, 3), (1, 2, 0)}
But that is probably what you said in the first place.
Here's another idea:
sage: L = [vect
c mullan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> by general theory I know that an invertible transformation matrix P
> exists such that A = ~P*J*P where J is the Jordan Normal Form of a
> square matrix A. When I try to calculate P, some strange things
> happen..
>
> M=MatrixSpace(GF(2),7)
> A=M.random_element()
>
> I don't know if this is the best idea or not but I definitely have
> run into this problem before and what I think I did was
> to store the list of vectors as a *Set* of *lists*.
Are you sure? Because as vectors, lists are unhashable :
...
TypeError: list objects are unhashable
--~--~-
Hi all,
by general theory I know that an invertible transformation matrix P
exists such that A = ~P*J*P where J is the Jordan Normal Form of a
square matrix A. When I try to calculate P, some strange things
happen..
M=MatrixSpace(GF(2),7)
A=M.random_element()
f=A.charpoly()
d = lcm([p.degree() f
On Jan 19, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Skylar wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been annoying the good folks of #sage-devel hoping to hack
> together a way to make notebook() run but be able to retrieve just 1
> cell of a worksheet for insertion into another webpage. Does anyone
> have a quick hack that I can
I don't know if this is the best idea or not but I definitely have
run into this problem before and what I think I did was
to store the list of vectors as a *Set* of *lists*.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:43 PM, slabbe wrote:
>
> PROBLEM :
> In a list of vectors, I want to know if there is a pair of
PROBLEM :
In a list of vectors, I want to know if there is a pair of equal
vectors.
I have two solutions. The first to create an empty list L and append
the vectors one per one. If a vector is already in L before adding it,
then I found a pair of equal vectors. But looking if a vector belongs
to
Hello,
I have been annoying the good folks of #sage-devel hoping to hack
together a way to make notebook() run but be able to retrieve just 1
cell of a worksheet for insertion into another webpage. Does anyone
have a quick hack that I can use here?
Thank you,
Skylar Saveland
--~--~-~--~
I am using Sage workbook 3.2.3. in Mozilla Firefox 3.0.5 I have a
problem with matrix output.
Line:
matrix([[diff(v_r(r, z), r), 0, diff(v_z(r, z), r)/2], [0, 0, 0],[diff
(v_z(r, z), r,)/2, 0, 0]])
produces output where one matrix row spans 2 rows on web browser
worksheet, like this
[ diff(v_r(
On Jan 19, 10:07 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 14 Led, 08:50, mabshoff
Hi Robert,
> To finish this thread: I had another lecture in computer lab today. We
> had 2GB RAM, very very big swap and 15 rather slow students with
> allmost no experiences with computer algebra systems ( = short
On 14 Led, 08:50, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Your server calls Maxima and without taking a closer look it is
> unclear to me if you start a Maxima process per user or not. Overall
> Maxima is lighter than Sage primarily because it is all common lisp
> and does not use any external libraries per defaul
Nikos,
> It seems that when the vertices are labelled 0,..., n-1 then the
> translation is simply 0 <-> n, and the rest is fixed. At least
> this is the case with all examples I've seen. Can I assume that
> this will allways be the case?
This is what happens. At first, the graph calls its rela
On Jan 19, 6:28 am, Pierre wrote:
> hi all
>
> I've just realized that SAGE knows about the Steenrod algebra now.
> Does it know about unstable modules, too ?
No, it doesn't, unfortunately. (Sage doesn't know about tensor
products, which has delayed me from implementing various things, like
the
>
> With an operator (say @@) for iterated composition,
> I could write simply instead:
>
> sage: f = lambda e: integrate(e,x)
> sage: (f @@ 4)(_)
I will ask the stupid question: Can SymbolicComposition etc. in the
calculus module be used for this after making something symbolic?
(My guess is
hi all
I've just realized that SAGE knows about the Steenrod algebra now.
Does it know about unstable modules, too ?
I have another, related question. I have computed the unstable module
structure on the mod 2 cohomology rings of quite a bunch of finite
groups, see
http://www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/
29 matches
Mail list logo
