-- Forwarded message --
From: pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Bug in ploting odd roots?
To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi William,
I have a similar problem and found this old post. Is there a less
complicated solution by now?
Silly me!
I used
sudo ./sage -optional
and everything work fines.
It was all about write permissions.
Thanks for your answers
On 28 Οκτ, 03:06, nostart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28 Οκτ, 02:45, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 5:44 pm, nostart <[EMA
Michael, William,
Thank you so much for the suggestions. I will re-install pexpect
and see if it helps. Yes, I am getting closer to the end (~60-70
packages built) but without pexpect/gap it is difficult to get sage to
boot up. I will meet and speak to Jose this week and request that you
get ac
Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> var("t")
> y=function('y',t)
> solve(diff(y,t,2)-2*diff(y,t)+diff(y,t)==3, y(t))
>
> to "solve" for y(t).
>
> Doesn't Axiom work this way?
Yes. (well, FriCAS is what I'm developing) Actually, one thing which is really
nice about FriCAS is that it's ve
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
>
>> "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Rubey
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear William,
thanks for your quick answer, even though it doesn't make me
On Oct 28, 2008, at 12:38 PM, John Cremona wrote:
> 2008/10/28 Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2008, at 2:15 PM, cesarnda wrote:
>>
>>> is there a way to do that in a fancy way in pure cython?
>>
>> No, the cartesian_product_iterator will still work in the context of
>> Sage
2008/10/28 Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 2:15 PM, cesarnda wrote:
>
>> is there a way to do that in a fancy way in pure cython?
>
> No, the cartesian_product_iterator will still work in the context of
> Sage though, as will Georg's solution.
>
> If I needed to do thi
On Oct 27, 2008, at 2:15 PM, cesarnda wrote:
> is there a way to do that in a fancy way in pure cython?
No, the cartesian_product_iterator will still work in the context of
Sage though, as will Georg's solution.
If I needed to do this loop super fast for an arbitrary number of k,
I might ei
On Oct 28, 10:44 am, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You need to have write permission to the $SAGE_ROOT tree to install
> > any spkg.
>
> Would be really nice, if this could be changed in future. Suppose university
> provides sage, but without
mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You need to have write permission to the $SAGE_ROOT tree to install
> any spkg.
Would be really nice, if this could be changed in future. Suppose university
provides sage, but without package SupiDupi, which is really super trooper.
Then I need to install
On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Rubey
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear William,
>>>
>>> thanks for your quick answer, even though it doesn't make me too
>>> happy. I'm
>>> hav
On Oct 28, 10:23 am, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Hm, not really. For my students, it's a site wide installation (and I'm
> > > not
> > > root) and it was already quite an effort to get sage running in the first
> > > place.
>
> > All you
mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hm, not really. For my students, it's a site wide installation (and I'm not
> > root) and it was already quite an effort to get sage running in the first
> > place.
>
> All you need to do is
>
> ./sage -i fricas-1.0.3.p0
>
> This doesn't touch anythin
mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 28, 9:55 am, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > After changing axiom.py in the $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage tree run "./sage -
> > > b" from $SAGE_ROOT. Note that you are changing the main Sage library
> > > and that the repo then has out
On Oct 28, 10:06 am, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Oct 28, 9:55 am, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > > After changing axiom.py in the $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage tree run "./sage -
> > > > b" from $SAGE_ROOT. Note that you a
On Oct 28, 9:55 am, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After changing axiom.py in the $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage tree run "./sage -
> > b" from $SAGE_ROOT. Note that you are changing the main Sage library
> > and that the repo then has outstanding uncommitted changes. Upgrading
> > such a
mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 28, 9:31 am, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> > "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Expect.__init__(self,
> > > name = 'axiom',
> > > prompt = '\([0-9]+\) -> ',
>
On Oct 28, 9:31 am, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Martin,
> "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Expect.__init__(self,
> > name = 'axiom',
> > prompt = '\([0-9]+\) -> ',
> > command = "sh -c 'axiom -nox -
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Expect.__init__(self,
> name = 'axiom',
> prompt = '\([0-9]+\) -> ',
> command = "sh -c 'axiom -nox -noclef | cat'",
Apart from modifying axiom.py, do I have to do anything else? Com
I get the following very weird result:
sage: A=axiom.series(z,z=0)
sage: A
sage: A
z
sage: B = (1/(1-A^2))
sage: B
246810 11
1 + z + z + z + z + z + O(z )
sage: A
246810 11
1 + z + z + z + z + z + O(z )
sage: A
z
sage: B
On Oct 27, 11:00 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sage: axiom.solve(sqrt(sqrt(4*x^2 + 1) - x^2 - 1), x)
>
> >+-+ +-+
> > [x= 0,x= \|2 ,x= - \|2 ]
>
> Sage's solve command is simply a light wrapper around Maxima's,
> and Maxima doesn't solve the above:
FTR the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for trying to help. I suppose that Chris Brown is in a similar
> situation as you and does not have an osx box to compile his code. It
> would probably be more efficient if someone with an osx box
Hi Jason,
Thanks for trying to help. I suppose that Chris Brown is in a similar
situation as you and does not have an osx box to compile his code. It
would probably be more efficient if someone with an osx box and with a
developer background (unlike me) asked him for specific advice. Also, I
Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Sorry about this. For some reasons, it didn't work for me, either, but
> now I re-applied the permissions and it seems to work again. Could you
> try it again? ftp://ftp.bgc-jena.mpg.de/pub/outgoing/sschym/qepcad_errors1
You could also try emailing Chris B
Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Sorry about this. For some reasons, it didn't work for me, either, but
> now I re-applied the permissions and it seems to work again. Could you
> try it again? ftp://ftp.bgc-jena.mpg.de/pub/outgoing/sschym/qepcad_errors1
>
> If it doesn't work, try the base
UPDATE:
The command 'y.subs(a)' as used above does not do what I thought. It
just substitutes the variable that comes first in the alphabet with
the definition for a!!!
In this case it did the right thing coincidentally, but not in the
below case:
Hi Jason,
Sorry about this. For some reasons, it didn't work for me, either, but
now I re-applied the permissions and it seems to work again. Could you
try it again? ftp://ftp.bgc-jena.mpg.de/pub/outgoing/sschym/qepcad_errors1
If it doesn't work, try the base address and click through. If a
dire
On Oct 28, 4:18 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear team,
>
> On Oct 27, 12:15 pm, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > So, it seems to me that theleakmight come from other compiled
> > components.
> > Libsingular? This is what I'm using most frequently.
Hi Simon,
> Now
Stan Schymanski wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> This is most interesting, as the web page claimed it was a pre-
> compiled binary! I did what you said, renamed the 'README' to
> 'install' and executed it, but I got quite a few error messages,
> starting with 'tcsh: /bin/ls: No match.' I put them up at
On Oct 27, 10:42 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to port sage 3.1.1 to an IBM Power5 AIX system. After
> > I install gap (in 32 bits), I get:
So how far did you get building Sage? If G
Dear team,
On Oct 27, 12:15 pm, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, it seems to me that theleakmight come from other compiled
> components.
> Libsingular? This is what I'm using most frequently.
Now i am sure that the leak is in libsingular.
I produced an F5 version that thoroughly use
2008/10/28 Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just to add another view, I can never remember all the different
> function names, so I find it very convenient to have namespace
> pollution as Martin Rubey calls it. If I look for a certain plot
> function, I would like to be able to type plot
Just to add another view, I can never remember all the different
function names, so I find it very convenient to have namespace
pollution as Martin Rubey calls it. If I look for a certain plot
function, I would like to be able to type plot and then hit the tab
button to see all the possible variat
Dear all,
I'm getting horribly confused either about what save_session does or
how to substitute variables. Or both, actually. Here is an example:
--
| SAGE Version 3.1.4, Release Date: 2008-10-20 |
| Type n
Thank you for you answer Robert
Just the alternative to fetch_int I needed.
The problem was that if you try to use fetch_int on a field of larger
size than GF(5^5) e.g. GF(3^42), then SAGE will switch to PARI finite
field objects and then the fetch_int will not work. But you small
alternative sum
Hi Jason,
This is most interesting, as the web page claimed it was a pre-
compiled binary! I did what you said, renamed the 'README' to
'install' and executed it, but I got quite a few error messages,
starting with 'tcsh: /bin/ls: No match.' I put them up at
ftp://ftp.bgc-jena.mpg.de/ftp/pub/out
2008/10/28 John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It should not be difficult to convert the power series over GF(p) to
> pari. If you do
>
> sage: R.=PowerSeriesRing(GF(5),"x")
> sage: f = x^2+1
>
> and then
>
> sage: f._pari_??
>
> you will see the comment that converson of power series from Sage t
It should not be difficult to convert the power series over GF(p) to
pari. If you do
sage: R.=PowerSeriesRing(GF(5),"x")
sage: f = x^2+1
and then
sage: f._pari_??
you will see the comment that converson of power series from Sage to
pari is currently only implemented over QQ and ZZ. And that
38 matches
Mail list logo
