Thanks William. This is what I needed.
On Apr 24, 9:57 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:51 AM, pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a basic question about loading object in the notebook
> > environment. Currently, I have to typed the whole path
I have followed the SAGE program guide and create the function
sumsquares (one of the examples there). It works for the same session
of the notebook. My question is how can I use this faster version of
sumsquares in the future?
At the moment, I just want when I type, e.g. sumsquares(1000), in a
n
Hi,
> So is Arch a direct descendent of Gentoo, i.e does it us a descendent
> of its ebuild system?
nope, Arch build system is more lightweight, it's PKGBUILD is like
ebuild just in BASH not Python, it's also made for binrary
distribution in mind with possible easy rebuild by user, while on
Ge
On Apr 24, 6:48 pm, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
Hi Osman,
> > Since I am relatively clueless about Arch can you poke around and tell me
> > what version of gdbm you have installed?
>
> gdbm-1.8.3-5 and this is the version used in Arch linux since
> 19.11.
William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> David Joyner wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:07 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:00 AM, UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Wo
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David Joyner wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:07 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:00 AM, UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Wow, I didn't know this! I alr
David Joyner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:07 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:00 AM, UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Wow, I didn't know this! I already wondered why SAGE should make such
>> > a stupid mistake. Thanks for the fast answe
That's a good idea, in particular for SAGE-beginners like me :)
On Apr 24, 7:07 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:00 AM, UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wow, I didn't know this! I already wondered why SAGE should make such
> > a stupid mistake. Tha
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:07 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:00 AM, UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Wow, I didn't know this! I already wondered why SAGE should make such
> > a stupid mistake. Thanks for the fast answer!
> >
>
> Because peo
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:19 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think this is because the underlying computer algebra system Sage
> uses for univariate polynomial rings and multivariate rings are
> completely different, so support different operations.
>
> Someone else might be
I think this is because the underlying computer algebra system Sage
uses for univariate polynomial rings and multivariate rings are
completely different, so support different operations.
Someone else might be able to suggest a work-round.
John
2008/4/24 UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> For some re
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:00 AM, UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wow, I didn't know this! I already wondered why SAGE should make such
> a stupid mistake. Thanks for the fast answer!
>
Because people get confused by this, we will likely remove the kernel
command and have only left_kernel()
Wow, I didn't know this! I already wondered why SAGE should make such
a stupid mistake. Thanks for the fast answer!
On Apr 24, 6:54 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:48 AM, UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Take a look at this here:
>
> > sage: A = m
For some reason, there is no covering morphism available for the
quotient ring QQ[X]/(X^2). But when I take the polynomial ring in two
variables, everything is fine:
sage: R. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: S = R.quo(X^2)
sage: S
Univariate Quotient Polynomial Ring in Xbar over Rational Field with
mod
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:48 AM, UAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Take a look at this here:
>
> sage: A = matrix(QQ, 3, [0,1,2,1,1,3,-1,0,-1])
> sage: A
>
> [ 0 1 2]
> [ 1 1 3]
> [-1 0 -1]
> sage: A.kernel()
>
> Vector space of degree 3 and dimension 1 over Rational Field
> Basis m
Take a look at this here:
sage: A = matrix(QQ, 3, [0,1,2,1,1,3,-1,0,-1])
sage: A
[ 0 1 2]
[ 1 1 3]
[-1 0 -1]
sage: A.kernel()
Vector space of degree 3 and dimension 1 over Rational Field
Basis matrix:
[ 1 -1 -1]
sage:
Perhaps I'm just completely dumb but this vector is not contained in
th
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:47 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2008/4/24 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:35 AM, bill.p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I needed to derive some continued fractions and a quick search of the
> > >
Hi,
- Hide quoted text -
> Hi Osman,
> Now, since Fortran as a culprit is out I poked around and the
> following seems to be the likely cause of your trouble:
> gcc -pthread -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -
> Wstrict-prototypes -DHAVE_NDBM_H -I. -I/var/abs/local
> /sa
2008/4/24 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:35 AM, bill.p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I needed to derive some continued fractions and a quick search of the
> > index suggests that the Pari-GP function 'contfrac' might be what I
> > needed.
> > A simp
Hi,
> Hi Osman,
>
> Now, since Fortran as a culprit is out I poked around and the
> following seems to be the likely cause of your trouble:
>
> gcc -pthread -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -
> Wstrict-prototypes -DHAVE_NDBM_H -I. -I/var/abs/local
> /sage/src/sage-3.0/spkg
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:35 AM, bill.p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I needed to derive some continued fractions and a quick search of the
> index suggests that the Pari-GP function 'contfrac' might be what I
> needed.
> A simple test in the notebook:
>
> gp('contfrac(sqrt(6))')
>
> p
I needed to derive some continued fractions and a quick search of the
index suggests that the Pari-GP function 'contfrac' might be what I
needed.
A simple test in the notebook:
gp('contfrac(sqrt(6))')
produced
[2, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4,
2, 4,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:51 AM, pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a basic question about loading object in the notebook
> environment. Currently, I have to typed the whole path in order to
> load a saved object.
>
> For example, I saved the matrix A as C by save(A,'C')
>
> But, say,
On Apr 24, 10:30 am, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
Hi Osman,
> > I doubt compilation finished successfully in your case. You need to
> > set SAGE_FORTAN to the system fortran since the g95 we ship is broken
> > on Arch. We didn't automate that so far and we have been discussing o
I have a basic question about loading object in the notebook
environment. Currently, I have to typed the whole path in order to
load a saved object.
For example, I saved the matrix A as C by save(A,'C')
But, say, I want to load it as B, I have to type
B = load('/home/sage/try/worksheets/admin/0
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> William Stein wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Jason Grout wrote:
>> >> > Lars Fischer wrote:
>> >> >> Hello,
>> >> >>
>>
Hi Michael,
> I doubt compilation finished successfully in your case. You need to
> set SAGE_FORTAN to the system fortran since the g95 we ship is broken
> on Arch. We didn't automate that so far and we have been discussing of
> solving that problem by defaulting to gfortran if it is available.
thanks, that did it for me...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
28 matches
Mail list logo
