On Feb 1, 7:03 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Terry Duell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Feb 1, 2008 1:25 AM
> Subject: Problems with sage 2.10 binary
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hullo,
Hi Terry,
> I tried to send this to sage-supp
-- Forwarded message --
From: Terry Duell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 1, 2008 1:25 AM
Subject: Problems with sage 2.10 binary
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hullo,
I tried to send this to sage-support, but need to be subscribed. I would like
to see if sage is what I need before subscrib
On Jan 31, 2008 11:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I downloaded the binary from
> http://sagemath.org/SAGEbin/apple_osx/intel/sage-2.10-osx-10.4-intel-...
I installed this binary about a week ago on an Intel MacBook OS X 10.4
and installation went smoothly. I'd try downloa
On Jan 31, 2008 12:40 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am getting the same problem on OSX 10.5 Intel - when I tried to do
> Josh's Lorenz attractor example, all I got was a black square. This
> was from command line, and from the notebook.
I tried this on my Mac OS X 10.4 Intel,
(Apologies for the crosspost -- posted this a little while ago to sage-
newbies, but after scanning this and that group I determined that I
should have posted to sage-support. -r)
I'm having trouble installing Sage on Intel/Mac OS X 10.4. The
instructions given are...
| 1) Download the dmg somew
On Jan 31, 2008, at 09:40 , Robert Miller wrote:
>
> I am getting the same problem on OSX 10.5 Intel - when I tried to do
> Josh's Lorenz attractor example, all I got was a black square. This
> was from command line, and from the notebook.
>
> On Jan 30, 7:12 am, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECT
I am getting the same problem on OSX 10.5 Intel - when I tried to do
Josh's Lorenz attractor example, all I got was a black square. This
was from command line, and from the notebook.
On Jan 30, 7:12 am, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had trouble getting the 3d plotting
This is ultimately a question for the NetworkX people, since these
functions are just wrapping theirs. I tried
sage: for x in range(100): show(graphs.DegreeSequence([3,3,3,3,3,3],
seed=randint(1,10)))
and I got a hundred planar graphs, and no K_{3,3}.
> First, just something I'm not fam
John,
> A variation of this, which would be useful in some elliptic curve
> calculations, would be a function
> RR(x).nearby_rational_whose_denominator_is_a_perfect_square().
>
> For either problem, is there a better solution than going through the
> continued fraction convergents until o
On Jan 31, 8:05 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could try substituting x+1 for x first, then do what you want, and
> substitute back at the end,
> I would expect the auto-simplification to happen at that last step
> too, but you would be able to (say) replace x by (x-1) in th
You could try substituting x+1 for x first, then do what you want, and
substitute back at the end,
I would expect the auto-simplification to happen at that last step
too, but you would be able to (say) replace x by (x-1) in the textual
output. I wonder if it is possible to have a variable whose n
A variation of this, which would be useful in some elliptic curve
calculations, would be a function
RR(x).nearby_rational_whose_denominator_is_a_perfect_square().
For either problem, is there a better solution than going through the
continued fraction convergents until one is found which has the
On Jan 31, 12:29 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 3:48 PM, pgdoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I would like to take the Taylor series of a matrix. But I find I
> > can't even put a Taylor polynomial into a matrix without its being
> > simplified.
>
>
Hi,
there is a method
RR(x).nearby_rational(...)
which returns a rational number
it would be convenient for me to have a method which returns a
rational number which has also a rational square root, something like
RR(x).nearby_rational_perfect_square(...)
, I'm not asking for a workaround, at
14 matches
Mail list logo
