Renaming $HOME/.sage did not help and I've upgraded to
2.8.14.
I still get the same error message.
Kelly
On Nov 23, 12:33 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 8:58 pm, trio123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> > I'm running SAGE 2.8.12 on Ubuntu
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Simon King wrote:
> Dear sage-supporters,
>
> sometimes, when a Singular object is printed, only the name but not
> the content is shown. In an example that David Joyner pointed me at,
> the output is
> x(1)^7*x(2)-x(1)*x(2)^7,sage4[1,2],sage4[1,3]
> but it should
> Or another idea: If V is a Singular object then
> sage: V
> could show V with abbreviations (if applicable), and
> sage: print(V)
> could show V without abbreviations.
... by using abbreviations in __repr__ and not using abbreviations in
__str__ , for example.
Yours
Simon
--~--~
Dear sage-supporters,
sometimes, when a Singular object is printed, only the name but not
the content is shown. In an example that David Joyner pointed me at,
the output is
x(1)^7*x(2)-x(1)*x(2)^7,sage4[1,2],sage4[1,3]
but it should be
x(1)^7*x(2)-x(1)*x(2)^7,
x(1)^12-2*x(1)^9*x(2)^3-
Ted Kosan wrote:
> Ondrej wrote:
>
>>> Could you please clarify, what exact functionality in solve you expect
>>> in order for 1235 to be solved?
>>>
>>> Should it just run the iterative numerical solver if it cannot find
>>> the solution analytically?
>
>
> And William wrote:
>
>> I don't kno
Ondrej wrote:
> > Could you please clarify, what exact functionality in solve you expect
> > in order for 1235 to be solved?
> >
> > Should it just run the iterative numerical solver if it cannot find
> > the solution analytically?
And William wrote:
> I don't know. However, Ted, what do you
On Nov 27, 2007 2:05 AM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not quite sure where to post this but I happened upon a strange
> result. I was using sage to check my work when solving roots of a
> polynomial mod 3^k. For mod 9 it is is not giving all the roots, yet
> for the other powers I
On Nov 26, 2007 2:54 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just received permission from my University to spend $1000 to have
> > the SAGE project fix the following bug:
> >
> > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1235
> >
>
> Could you please clarify, what exact functionality
On Nov 27, 2007 4:50 AM, Francis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading 2.3 of the Reference Manual from the Notebook interface, I find that
> this "live" version has turned the lines:
>
Hi,
Thanks for your report! I've made this ticket #1288
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12
Reading 2.3 of the Reference Manual from the Notebook interface, I
find that this "live" version has turned the lines:
\item
\verb+-advanced+ Lists additional options:
\begin{verbatim}
$ sage -advanced
in devel/doc-main/ref/options.tex into
-advanced Lists additional options:
sage -advance
On Nov 26, 11:03 pm, "Jonathan Hanke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Jon,
>
> I just cloned one of my sage 2.8.12 branches (which worked), but it failed
> to build the new branch. The old one builds fine. I have a Mac Book with
> OS 10.4, and the error message is below. I also tried
I'm not quite sure where to post this but I happened upon a strange
result. I was using sage to check my work when solving roots of a
polynomial mod 3^k. For mod 9 it is is not giving all the roots, yet
for the other powers I checked (up to 4) the results were correct.
I am using version 2.8.9
> I just received permission from my University to spend $1000 to have
> the SAGE project fix the following bug:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1235
>
Could you please clarify, what exact functionality in solve you expect
in order for 1235 to be solved?
Should it just run the iter
Hi,
I just cloned one of my sage 2.8.12 branches (which worked), but it failed
to build the new branch. The old one builds fine. I have a Mac Book with
OS 10.4, and the error message is below. I also tried a "sage -upgrade" on
my main branch with similar results. I am afraid to rebuild anythin
14 matches
Mail list logo
