[sage-support] Re: trac

2007-11-25 Thread William Stein
On Nov 25, 2007 8:27 PM, Dennis Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Type > >trac() > > Warning: found no users in realm: localhost > > After opening Trac at: > > http://localhost:1 > > Browser displays: > > Available Projects > Open Kitchen > > Click on link and go to http://localhost:1/sag

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.14 released!

2007-11-25 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Nov 25, 2007, at 24:24 , mabshoff wrote: > > SAGE 2.8.14: > > At least the following people contributed to this release: Built and tested ("make test") successfully: Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Quad Core Xeon, "-j6"): real61m34.078s user47m3.121s sys 24m32.670s All test

[sage-support] Re: using Singular's invariant_ring

2007-11-25 Thread David Joyner
On Nov 25, 2007 4:29 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 25, 2007 3:27 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > @Martin Albrecht: > > > - Is there a reasonable way to fix this in the interface? > > > > Hi, the 'trivial' way to fix it, is to implement a Python

[sage-support] Re: using Singular's invariant_ring

2007-11-25 Thread William Stein
On Nov 25, 2007 3:27 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > @Martin Albrecht: > > - Is there a reasonable way to fix this in the interface? > > Hi, the 'trivial' way to fix it, is to implement a Python function for > SinguleElement called invariant_ring which calls the Singular funct

[sage-support] Re: using Singular's invariant_ring

2007-11-25 Thread Simon King
Hi David, On Nov 24, 10:38 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The commands at > http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/latest/sing_1083.htm#SEC1142 > are a good example to start. In my previous post, i explained how one might use invariant_ring (for getting a Hironaka decomposition)

[sage-support] Re: Possible bug in graph isomorphism search_tree function

2007-11-25 Thread Robert Miller
Okay, I guess the profiler is only profiling Python calls, so it's not so good to figure out what's going on. There are some linux tools that may help with this. I will look into this and post back in a while (maybe > 1 week) when I have something. Thank you for reporting this important example.

[sage-support] Re: import sage.rings.integer fails

2007-11-25 Thread William Stein
On Nov 25, 2007 10:30 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2007 10:29 AM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I started writing an external library that uses Sage and I meditatly ran > > into: > > > > >>> import sage.rings.integer > > Traceback (m

[sage-support] Re: import sage.rings.integer fails

2007-11-25 Thread William Stein
On Nov 25, 2007 10:29 AM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I started writing an external library that uses Sage and I meditatly ran into: > > >>> import sage.rings.integer > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > ImportError: libcsage.so: cannot open sh

[sage-support] import sage.rings.integer fails

2007-11-25 Thread Timothy Clemans
Hi, I started writing an external library that uses Sage and I meditatly ran into: >>> import sage.rings.integer Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError: libcsage.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >>> import sage.rings.arith Traceback (mo

[sage-support] Re: using Singular's invariant_ring

2007-11-25 Thread Martin Albrecht
> @Martin Albrecht: > - Is there a reasonable way to fix this in the interface? Hi, the 'trivial' way to fix it, is to implement a Python function for SinguleElement called invariant_ring which calls the Singular function, parses the output and returns a tuple. If you call A.invariant_ring the

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-2.8.13 released!

2007-11-25 Thread Alexander Dreyer
Hello Michael, > Ok, if that does the trick I will merge the fix into 2.8.14 provided > it compiles locally on the test boxen (which it should). I looked at > the configure log in detail and it seems very weired that it fails > that late because it does find a gmp and gmp headers. Hm, I'm not sur

[sage-support] Re: Possible bug in graph isomorphism search_tree function

2007-11-25 Thread Dustin Pluta
Here are a couple similar graphs that go fine: G = {0: {1: None, 6: None, 7: None, 10: None, 11: None, 12: None, 13: None}, 1: {0: None, 6: None, 7: None, 10: None, 11: None, 12: None, 13: None, 18: None}, 2: {3: None, 4: None, 5: None, 8: None, 9: None, 14: None, 15: None, 20: None}, 3: {2: None

[sage-support] SAGE-2.8.14 released!

2007-11-25 Thread mabshoff
SAGE 2.8.14: At least the following people contributed to this release: - Michael Abshoff - Martin Albrecht - John Cremona - Alexander Dreyer - Bill Hart - David Joyner - Josh Kantor - William Stein - Carl Witty Feedback and testing by Andrzej Giniewicz and Simon King, Jaap Spies, Greg