On Oct 31, 7:40 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 7:34 am, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > try using the tiger binaries, since they work in leopard also.
>
> A remark: I just noticed that the leopard binary is about 53 mb
> smaller than th
On Oct 31, 7:34 am, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
> try using the tiger binaries, since they work in leopard also.
A remark: I just noticed that the leopard binary is about 53 mb
smaller than the tiger binary, and that seems to indicate that
something went wrong with the tig
try using the tiger binaries, since they work in leopard also.
- William
(Sent from my iPhone.)
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I know that building from source isn't yet supported in OS X 10.5, but
> when I tried to run the precompiled Leopard bin
Hi All,
I know that building from source isn't yet supported in OS X 10.5, but
when I tried to run the precompiled Leopard binaries, I get the
following:
***
--
| SAGE Version 2.8.10, Release Dat
On Oct 29, 12:05 am, Manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In sage, the arguments of numpy.dot can be changed when they
> shouldn't. The following illustrates the problem:
>
> import numpy as npy
> # With sage.rings.integer.Integer:
> x = npy.array([1])
> print x
> # [1]
> npy.dot(x, npy.array([0])
My postdoc mentor is being flown to China to give a presentation on
teaching undergraduate linear algebra in the U.S. She is emphasizing
technology in teaching. She will talk about Mathematica, Maple, Matlab,
and calculators in teaching. When she asked for other software, I
mentioned Octa
Dear Martin,
> I can try to do this later but as you know this code better could you give it
> a shot?
I got it!
I was setting degBound.
Apparently in SuperCommutative it is not checked whether degBound is
sufficiently large. Hence, a relation z^2 with deg(z)>1 will not be
found when we have de
> In fact, it doesn't fix the problem. So, it seems to be a problem of
> Singular and not of the interface (do you mean this by "good"? ;-)
Kind of, because we seem to be off the hook ;-)
> > start simplifying the code as long as the error remains by hand.
> > I can try to do this later but as y
Dear Martin,
> cat logfile | egrep "^>" | sed s/"^>"// | Singular
>
> Then, I'd remove all strictly unnecessary lines like killing of variables.
>
> cat logfile | egrep "^>" | sed s/"^> "// | sed s/"^if(defined.*$"// | Singular
>
> and (as this doesn't fix the problem, which is good)
In fact, it
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Simon King wrote:
> Dear William, dear Martin,
>
> > and change the line (1145) that creates the singular interface to
> >
> >singular = Singular(logfile="/tmp/logfile")
>
> That worked, thank you! The Result is in the attachment. In line 947, I do
> print(sage130)
Dear William, dear Martin,
> and change the line (1145) that creates the singular interface to
>
>singular = Singular(logfile="/tmp/logfile")
That worked, thank you! The Result is in the attachment. In line 947, I do
print(sage130), and this prints the example with the two missing
relatio
On 10/30/07, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you 'tell' the Singular interface to write a logfile, you/we can see what
> > is going on on the Singular side:
>
> Can you tell me what i did wrong:
> sage: singular = Singular(logfile='singlog')
> sage: from cohomology import *
> sage: C=
Dear Martin,
> If you 'tell' the Singular interface to write a logfile, you/we can see what
> is going on on the Singular side:
Can you tell me what i did wrong:
sage: singular = Singular(logfile='singlog')
sage: from cohomology import *
sage: C=COHO('125gp3')
sage: C.make(3)
...
sage: singular.
> Do you know of any "dangerous" commands that can cause Singular to
> start to compute nonsense? Perhaps an answer would simplify my attempt
> to detect an error in my code.
Hi Simon,
I don't know such commands, but I have a suggestion which should help you/us
to debug this.
If you 'tell' the
Dear sage-support team,
i met a very strange error of Singular under Sage.
The error only occured after doing some other computations. I'm afraid
the complete code would be too long, but I'll try to extract the parts
of my computation that are relevant to the problem, which will take a
while.
E
15 matches
Mail list logo
