On 9/14/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting this upgrade error:
Thanks for reporting this! The problem should now be fixed.
William
>
> Using SAGE Server http://www.sagemath.org//packages
> http://www.sagemath.org//packages/install --> install
> [.]
> http://www.sage
I'm getting this upgrade error:
Using SAGE Server http://www.sagemath.org//packages
http://www.sagemath.org//packages/install --> install
[.]
http://www.sagemath.org//packages/standard/list --> list
[.]
http://www.sagemath.org//packages/standard/deps --> deps
[..]
http://www.sagemath.org//package
On Sep 15, 12:20 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 12:19 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dear Professor Stein,
>
> Well, he is known as William around here :)
>
>
>
>
>
> > The binaries work fine, that was not the problem. Simply i wanted to learn
On Sep 15, 12:19 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Professor Stein,
Well, he is known as William around here :)
>
> The binaries work fine, that was not the problem. Simply i wanted to learn
> to build SAGE by myself, and when i found that "make" finished but did not
> yield a
On 9/14/07, David Stahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you William. Unfortunately the coefficient command does not
> appear to allow me to determine what terms the coefficients are
> associated with. If I had the expression:
>
> a*x^2+b*x*y +c*y^2
>
> and the b term was zero the output woul
Thank you William. Unfortunately the coefficient command does not
appear to allow me to determine what terms the coefficients are
associated with. If I had the expression:
a*x^2+b*x*y +c*y^2
and the b term was zero the output would be [a,c] but I would not
know if the zero element was a, b, o
On 9/14/07, David Stahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am using the sage command groebner_basis().
>
> David
OK, this just seems like a case of showing you an example will
answer the question. Let me know if it doesn't:
sage: P. = PolynomialRing(QQ,3, order='lex')
sage: I = sage.rings.ideal.
On 9/14/07, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is actually an unrelated issue. A user must have write permissions
> > to the *current* directory to run the notebook, since it stores its state
> > files in the current directory. Try instead:
>
> I've noticed this before, but I've
> This is actually an unrelated issue. A user must have write permissions
> to the *current* directory to run the notebook, since it stores its state
> files in the current directory. Try instead:
I've noticed this before, but I've never really thought too much about
it. Because of this, I've
I am using the sage command groebner_basis().
David
On Sep 14, 1:05 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2007, David Stahl wrote:
>
> > Can anyone tell me how to extract the coefficients from the results of
> > groebner()?
>
> Dou you mean Ideal.groebner_basis
On Friday 14 September 2007, David Stahl wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to extract the coefficients from the results of
> groebner()?
Dou you mean Ideal.groebner_basis i.e. the SAGE method or
SingularElement.groebner i.e. the Singular command? As you try to call coeff
you probably refer tot h
Can anyone tell me how to extract the coefficients from the results of
groebner()? I tried using coeff() but it gives me the error "object
has no attribute coeff". Thank you.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegr
I am interested in learning how to do this, but my knowledge of
javascript and css is weak. If anyone can give pointers on what
exactly controls the spacing it would help. Is it all in css.py or is
there anything in other files in /server/notebook that is relevant?
Would it be a command such as
On 9/14/07, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Never mind, I suspect pentium4-fc6 means that it's "fedora core 6".
>
> Yes, Fedora Core 6
>
> % cat /proc/version
> Linux version 2.6.20-1.2962.fc6 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
> bc2-14.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat
> 4.1.1-51)) #1 SM
William,
> Never mind, I suspect pentium4-fc6 means that it's "fedora core 6".
Yes, Fedora Core 6
% cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.20-1.2962.fc6 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
bc2-14.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat
4.1.1-51)) #1 SMP Tue Jun 19 19:27:14 EDT 2007
> Does it always
On 9/14/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Kate Minola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > William,
> >
> > sage-2.8.4.2 built from source with gcc-4.2.1
> > passed all tests on
> >
> > x86_64-Linux
> > ia64-Linux <- YEAH!!!
> >
> > but sadly failed one test on
> >
> >
On 9/14/07, Kate Minola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William,
>
> sage-2.8.4.2 built from source with gcc-4.2.1
> passed all tests on
>
> x86_64-Linux
> ia64-Linux <- YEAH!!!
>
> but sadly failed one test on
>
> x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6)
Does it always fail that test in the same way? I
William,
sage-2.8.4.2 built from source with gcc-4.2.1
passed all tests on
x86_64-Linux
ia64-Linux <- YEAH!!!
but sadly failed one test on
x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6)
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot3d/transform.pyx
**
On 9/14/07, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear SAGE-Team,
>
> On Sep 12, 8:56 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Simon -- very important:
> >1. Precisely what Linux distribution (with version) are you using?
> >2. What is your computer (processor, RAM, etc.)
>
>
On 9/14/07, Jan Groenewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed 2.8.4.1-i686-ubuntu instead of 2.8-i686 on
> ubuntu feisty today. I install systemwide, as root:
>
> cd /usr/local/src/
> wget
> http://www.sagemath.org/SAGEbin/linux/32bit/sage-2.8.4.1-i686-ubuntu-Linux.tar.gz
> tar xvzf sage-2.
Hi
I installed 2.8.4.1-i686-ubuntu instead of 2.8-i686 on
ubuntu feisty today. I install systemwide, as root:
cd /usr/local/src/
wget
http://www.sagemath.org/SAGEbin/linux/32bit/sage-2.8.4.1-i686-ubuntu-Linux.tar.gz
tar xvzf sage-2.8.4.1-i686-ubuntu-Linux.tar.gz
cp sage-2.8.4.1-i686-Linux/sage
Dear SAGE-Team,
On Sep 12, 8:56 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon -- very important:
>1. Precisely what Linux distribution (with version) are you using?
>2. What is your computer (processor, RAM, etc.)
uname -a says:
Linux mpc739 2.6.18.8-0.3-default #1 SMP Tue Apr 1
22 matches
Mail list logo
