I am sure other people will have more to say about this, but SCILAB
seems to be more aimed at numerical computation and doesn't have much
support for working in areas like number theory, combinatorics, exact
linear algebra, etc. There's also a question of licensing (more
restrictive commer
On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Jose wrote:
>
> All:
>
> I'm thinking about putting together another screencast in the same
> vein as
>
> http://showmedo.com/videos/video?name=2450010&fromSeriesID=245
>
> on the special idioms in sage (i.e. the 0..10 = range(10)) and on the
> new functions to put G
On Sep 16, 2008, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for the confusion regarding range().
>>>
>>> Are there other idioms not in standard python that should be
>>> highlighted?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:58 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>>> Of course, because I like Sage I'd like to be able to do this
>>> entirely in Sage. One problem with gnumeric is that
>>> there is no mac version I know of. (Of course,
>>> one could buy excel for a mac but I don't want to do that.)
>
> You can use
On Jan 15, 2009, at 4:10 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
> That's interesting because I calculated M37 = 2^3021377-1 (909526
> digits) on a 2.6 GHz pentium 4 using my own C++ class to represent
> large ints and it about 2 hours.
>
> I calculated the same thing on www.sagenb.org and it took about
On Jan 15, 2009, at 4:25 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
> OK, I'm confused about the time procedure. What's the difference
> between
> sage: time s = 2^3021377-1
> CPU time: 0.00 s, Wall time: 0.00 s
The variable s now holds the integer 2^3021377-1, represented
internally in binary.
> and
>
On Jan 15, 2009, at 4:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 15, 2009, at 4:10 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> That's interesting because I calculated M37 = 2^3021377-1 (909526
>>>
On Jan 15, 2009, at 4:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> [[his
>>> timing turns
>>> out to really have been of printing out the answer via the notebook.
>>> better would be to do
>>> sage: time s = 2^3021377-1
>>> CPU time: 0.00 s, Wall time: 0.00 s
>>> sage: time open('output.txt','w').write(str
On Jan 15, 2009, at 4:57 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/15/2009 7:53:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> wst...@gmail.com writes:
> It wasn't. 2^3021377-1 is the third largest known and the next two
> larger are
> only slightly bigger.
> I was calculating M37 which is the la
On Jan 17, 2009, at 5:51 AM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
> BTW, if www.sagenb.org runs on a single PC with a quadcore, the
> question still remains, is Sage multicore aware without dSage or are
> you using dSage here?
Some of the underlaying components, like ATLAS, can be compiled to be
multicore
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:12 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/27/2009 2:38:49 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> wst...@gmail.com writes:
> This discussion should be on sage-nt, the list for sage number theory
> discussion:
> Oh, I did not know of this list! How do I get a list of all
On Feb 13, 2009, at 8:43 AM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
>> The NSF has just put out a video series (five minutes each, maybe) on
>> the state of math ed in the country. It's actually somewhat
>> disappointingly vague in parts, but certainly has potential to get
>> peopl
On Feb 15, 2009, at 6:23 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 15, 6:17 am, David Joyner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Hi Herli. There are people working on this, but off the top of my
>> head
>> I am not sure if they are members of this list or not. If no one
>> replies
>> within several days, I'll dig up ema
On May 7, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Rado wrote:
> Hello,
>
> To test the 3D plotting abilities of sage, I tried to implement some
> basic tube plotting like the ones here
> http://facstaff.unca.edu/mcmcclur/java/LiveMathematica/tubes.html
> (mathematica handles those beautifully).
>
> The code is nice a
I don't believe we have anything like this yet, but it seems it could
be (relatively) easily built on top of the new and very cool 3d
implicit plotting functionality.
- Robert
On May 15, 2009, at 1:42 AM, Jurgis Pralgauskis wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> stereometry needs imagination or more experie
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:52 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Mike wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I have a quick question. I'm fairly new to python and sage,
>> and am
>> attempting to learn it to use in my engineering classes. My
>> problem is
>> that I have 2 lists
>> x = [1, 2, 3
On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:18 PM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
> jason-s...@creativetrax.com a écrit :
>>
>> Williams post:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Grant proposal season is upon us, and things are in the works.
>> Imagine somebody said to you:
>>
>> "Please send me a list of items you would like us to fund. Wha
On Oct 21, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your answers. I think also that starting simple and small
> is
> a way to increase the use of Sage also. My questions about interface
> and
> language because I'm trying to use CAS in education with note
On Dec 9, 2009, at 12:44 PM, michel paul wrote:
> > Sound familiar to anyone?
>
> Absolutely! Yeah, the average HS student just wants to be told what
> to do. So this has been very tricky - how to get the kids to use
> something like Sage/Python as a way to explore ideas on their own
> whe
On Dec 11, 2009, at 9:52 PM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
> Byungchul Cha wrote:
>> This discussion is very relevant to me, as I am also in the process
>> of
>> working with our IT people at my campus in order to set up a sage
>> server for my college.
>>
>> My IT person suggests that I ru
On Feb 15, 2010, at 5:40 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Although I personally enjoy the *good* examples; honestly, I think it
would be irresponsible to ask someone taking calculus as a pre-
physical-therapy student (which ours are required to, for good
biomechanical reasons) to learn from a definition-theo
On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:43 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Hi Mike,
First, thanks for your work on this.
An implementation of finite abelian groups would be at the top of my
list. Folklore has it many have tried - not sure just where it gets
hard.
Implementing it isn't that hard (I think)--we already ha
On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 at 10:53PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
A related idea -- when people click "public" they could opt-in with a
checkbox to publish under a certain license. Then we can legally
collect together the best published worksheets elsewhe
On May 18, 2010, at 4:24 PM, A. Jorge Garcia wrote:
Wow, I tried using http://www.sagenb.org all day in class today and it
was WAY SLOW!!!
I finally discovered an alternate sage server at clemson and things
went a bit better. I have tried the KAIST server inthe past, but it
seems to be down or
On Jun 17, 2010, at 5:06 PM, Calcpage wrote:
Why set up a virtual box when you have linux?
For security reasons.
Regards,
A. Jorge Garcia
Applied Math & CS
http://shadowfaxrant.blogspot.com
Sent from my iPod
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Bruce Cohen wrote:
It's summertime, and I thought
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:32 PM, A. Jorge Garcia wrote:
> My Discrete Math students today came up with an observation: The
> average of any 3 consecutive terms of an arithmetic sequence equals
> the middle term. So, I thought we'd show off some CAS in SAGE (this
> class uses python primarily) and
I don't know the answer to your question, but I bet you'd have better
luck on sage-support.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Maura Murray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an easy way to change the axes in plot so that the ticks are
> marked at intervals of pi/4 or pi/2?
>
> Thanks,
> Maura
>
> P.S.- If
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:35 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:32 PM, dimpase wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 19, 7:37 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>>> Will all these students take the exam in class simultaneously
>>> in a large computer lab?
>>>
>>
>> yes, that's the idea (well, we have 3 l
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:39 AM, David Smith wrote:
> I could live with nthroot -- but is cuberoot (or curt or cbrt) so different
> from sqrt?
Cubic roots are much less common. They don't even have their own
(unparameterized) symbol. I think some kind of a (real?) nth root
function makes sense.
29 matches
Mail list logo
