>
> Some may say I should persevere until the students "snap out" of their
> old passive way of doing things. If I was sure this was the silver
> bullet of math teaching, I would be confident enough to fight this
> battle. I'm not sure this is the holy grail yet.
>
>
This is certainly pedagogica
> The Scratch project at MIT
> (http://scratch.mit.edu/) is also an excellent way to think about
> programming in a different way, though I don't know how usable it
> would be for a math class.
Incidentally, as an idea for future Sage Ed Days concept... check out
http://day.scratch.mit.edu/
In 2
I am a high school teacher in Turtleford, SK Canada and am thinking
about using sage in some of my teaching. The one problem I have right
now is all of the complex roots found when solving an equation. Is
there a way to restrict the returned solutions to the Reals?
--
You received this message be
jason.t.stein wrote:
> I am a high school teacher in Turtleford, SK Canada and am thinking
> about using sage in some of my teaching. The one problem I have right
> now is all of the complex roots found when solving an equation. Is
> there a way to restrict the returned solutions to the Reals?
>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:11 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>>
>> Some may say I should persevere until the students "snap out" of their
>> old passive way of doing things. If I was sure this was the silver
>> bullet of math teaching, I would be confident enough to fight this
>> battle. I'm not sure this
On Dec 9, 2009, at 12:44 PM, michel paul wrote:
> > Sound familiar to anyone?
>
> Absolutely! Yeah, the average HS student just wants to be told what
> to do. So this has been very tricky - how to get the kids to use
> something like Sage/Python as a way to explore ideas on their own
> whe
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2009, at 12:44 PM, michel paul wrote:
>
>> > Sound familiar to anyone?
>>
>> Absolutely! Yeah, the average HS student just wants to be told what
>> to do. So this has been very tricky - how to get the kids to use
>> something l
I prefer Polynomials than symbolic expression :
sage: R. = PolynomialRing(QQ, 'x')
sage: P = (x^2 + 1) * (x^2 - x - 1)
sage: P.roots() # no root in QQ
[]
sage: P.roots(RR) # two roots in RR
[(-0.618033988749895, 1), (1.61803398874989, 1)]
sage: P.roots(CC) # four roots in CC
[(-0.61803398874989
On Dec 9, 2:23 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Do you have a list of things those students do like?
I don't have any specific things about Sage I've heard yet.
cs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-edu" group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Dec 10, 9:11 am, kcrisman wrote:
> you might want to make the transition to the
> typing a little more gradually - perhaps using Sage @interacts that
> are completely click or drag, then ones where you have to type in
> numbers,
I think this is sage advice (pun intended). Starting with @int
10 matches
Mail list logo