I agree, some consistent syntax for multiple integrals is needed.
For example, to me this seems strange:
sage: x,y = var("x,y")
sage: f = y*sin(x*y)
sage: bool(diff(f,x,y) == diff(diff(f,x),y))
True
sage: bool(integral(f,x,y) == integral(integral(f,x),y))
False
At least, it is a possible source
Sorry for replying to my own post, as I should have checked this sooner:
sage: import sympy
sage: sympy.integrate(f,x,y) == sympy.integrate(sympy.integrate(f,x),y)
True
sage: sympy.diff(f,x,y) == sympy.diff(sympy.diff(f,x),y)
True
So Sympy is consistent in terms of the diff/integrate syntax. How
Last time I checked I did not see anything regarding extensive 3D
visualization for SAGE. I was wondering whether it is something that
some one might be working on? Or whether this will be developed in the
future... More specifically, I would like to know whether SAGE will
eventually be able to ge
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:00 PM, marcos wrote:
>
> Last time I checked I did not see anything regarding extensive 3D
> visualization for SAGE. I was wondering whether it is something that
> some one might be working on? Or whether this will be developed in the
> future... More specifically, I woul
marcos wrote:
> Last time I checked I did not see anything regarding extensive 3D
> visualization for SAGE. I was wondering whether it is something that
> some one might be working on? Or whether this will be developed in the
> future... More specifically, I would like to know whether SAGE will
>
