[sage-edu] MathML

2009-01-11 Thread mhampton
I thought for the record I would mention that at the joint meetings someone asked why we didn't support MathML. My impression is that someone began to, but lack of demand or interest has resulted in that stagnating. There are probably benefits in getting some people to use Sage who have investe

[sage-edu] Re: MathML

2009-01-11 Thread David Joyner
Support presentation mathml as output or content mathml as input? Maybe both? I was told by Steve Linton a few years ago that there is no Python wrapper for MathML but he thought one would be a good project. There is this Latex->mathml translator written in a "mini-language" designed to be easy t

[sage-edu] Re: MathML

2009-01-11 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:23 AM, mhampton wrote: > > I thought for the record I would mention that at the joint meetings > someone asked why we didn't support MathML. My impression is that > someone began to, but lack of demand or interest has resulted in that > stagnating. Here's the history o

[sage-edu] Re: MathML

2009-01-11 Thread mhampton
> When you write "There are probably benefits in getting some people to > use Sage who have invested time in materials written in MathML." what > do you mean? I don't know what "materials written in MathML" means, > since it's not like MathML is just an alternative to latex. > > -- William I s