I thought for the record I would mention that at the joint meetings someone asked why we didn't support MathML. My impression is that someone began to, but lack of demand or interest has resulted in that stagnating. There are probably benefits in getting some people to use Sage who have invested time in materials written in MathML. I don't have any strong opinions on this, I just wanted to start a thread to revisit the issue.
I don't personally have the time or inclination to work on making our support for MathML better, but it might be a good first project for someone interested in improving sage for educational purposes. Marshall Hampton --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-edu@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-edu+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
