Re: [sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

2024-08-15 Thread Georgi Guninski
> A4 modifying a comment by someone else (including modifying the PR > description) This abuse of moderation sucks much. Is it legal a mod loser to modify my writing? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_... First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— Becau

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 7:33:49 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: ... we discussed the size of these wheel files previously in the thread "Current status of possibility of integrating libraries written in Rust into Sage" ( https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/JiSryImYGe0/m/LeNyLi6dFAAJ).

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Kwankyu Lee
For comparison: The current total size is 1.4 gigabytes. For the sizes of the release tarballs since 9.0, see https://mirrors.mit.edu/sage/src/index.html To watch continuously and for non-developer users, those tarballs should be reachable by a click from the installation guide. -- You re

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Do you mean this https://github.com/sagemath/sage/archive/refs/tags/10.4.tar.gz ? This one also does not have "upstream/" directory. No, that one is also automatically generated by GitHub and contains the same files as the .zip file. This one: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/releases/dow

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Kwankyu Lee
For comparison: The current total size is 1.4 gigabytes. For the sizes of the release tarballs since 9.0, see https://mirrors.mit.edu/sage/src/index.html According to https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/releasing-projects-on-github/about-releases, there is 2GB limit on the size of asse

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 4:54:29 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: Why don't we upload only sage-10.x.tar.gz as assets? It contains all other files uploaded there. Our download procedure for upstream tarballs likes to download individual files. -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 4:10:27 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > those tarballs should be reachable by a click from the installation guide. That's exactly where the existing link in the installation guide leads, after the mirror selection. Note that the decision to de-emphasize use of the se

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Kwankyu Lee
On Friday, August 16, 2024 at 10:50:34 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: On Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 4:54:29 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: Why don't we upload only sage-10.x.tar.gz as assets? It contains all other files uploaded there. Our download procedure for upstream tarballs likes to dow

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Kwankyu Lee
On Friday, August 16, 2024 at 10:50:38 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: On Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 4:10:27 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > those tarballs should be reachable by a click from the installation guide. That's exactly where the existing link in the installation guide leads, after th

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

2024-08-15 Thread Kwankyu Lee
On Friday, August 16, 2024 at 11:01:28 AM UTC+9 Kwankyu Lee wrote: On Friday, August 16, 2024 at 10:50:34 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: On Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 4:54:29 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: Why don't we upload only sage-10.x.tar.gz as assets? It contains all other files uploa