[sage-devel] message marked as off topic

I asked a question at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38219 which was promptly labelled off topic, so I suppose I should ask it here: The preceding message on the pull request was: I have removed the improper use of the "disputed" label. My question (and comment) was: Why is the

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

According to the preliminary discussion on "disputed PRs" (https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/XDvKkMRoDk4): a. *When there is disagreement about whether a PR should be merged, anyone may mark a PR as disputed.* Now I guess that you may answer to your own questions. -- You received this

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

Sorry, I don't understand. I was asking on the PR why the disputed label was *removed*, not added. And I do not understand, why my question was marked as "off topic". Martin On Tuesday 13 August 2024 at 13:55:32 UTC+2 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > According to the preliminary discussion on "disputed

[sage-devel] Re: hyperbolic_polygon bug

This was previously reported as issue #32362 on github , so any further discussion should take place there. The solution suggested there is to have sagemath calculate endpoints in the Poincare disk model, instead of in the upper half plane model.

Re: [sage-devel] message marked as off topic

I marked #38219 as disputed as it has cannibalised my earlier proposal without any reference. Dima On 13 August 2024 10:04:12 BST, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: >I asked a question at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38219 which was >promptly labelled off topic, so I suppose I should

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

I marked Martin's message as off-topic because PR discussions are not a place for discussions about procedure. On Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 2:04:13 AM UTC-7 Martin R wrote: > I asked a question at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/38219 which > was promptly labelled off topic, so I suppos

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

I must say that I find this response intolerable. I cannot quit, because I have duties, but I am really pissed off. Martin On Tuesday 13 August 2024 at 21:41:54 UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > I marked Martin's message as off-topic because PR discussions are not a > place for discussions about p

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

I cannot quit, because I have duties, but I am really pissed off. You are not alone. Everyone here was offended in his own way. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, s

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

> Does this [platform-dependent standard package] mean that there will be different sage tarballs for supported platforms? I want to here an answer for this question. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group

[sage-devel] Re: message marked as off topic

In my opinion, the decision to hide a comment should not be made by a single person. I might even suggest that the authority to make such a decision should lie solely with the Sage Code of Conduct Committee. (I am a member of that committee, but I am expressing my own views here, not those of t